ENVIRONMENTAL EFFECTS OF AGRICULTURAL LAND-USE CHANGE: THE ROLE OF ECONOMICS AND POLICY

R. Lubowski, S. Bucholtz, R. Claassen, M. Roberts, J. Cooper, Anna i. Gueorguieva, R. Johansson
{"title":"ENVIRONMENTAL EFFECTS OF AGRICULTURAL LAND-USE CHANGE: THE ROLE OF ECONOMICS AND POLICY","authors":"R. Lubowski, S. Bucholtz, R. Claassen, M. Roberts, J. Cooper, Anna i. Gueorguieva, R. Johansson","doi":"10.22004/AG.ECON.33591","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This report examines evidence on the relationship between agricultural land-use changes, soil productivity, and indicators of environmental sensitivity. If cropland that shifts in and out of production is less productive and more environmentally sensitive than other cropland, policy-induced changes in land use could have production effects that are smaller-and environmental impacts that are greater-than anticipated. To illustrate this possibility, this report examines environmental outcomes stemming from landuse conversion caused by two agricultural programs that others have identified as potentially having important influences on land use and environmental quality: Federal crop insurance subsidies and the Conservation Reserve Program (CRP), the Nation's largest cropland retirement program. The report finds that lands moving between cultivated cropland and less intensive agricultural uses are, on average, less productive and more vulnerable to erosion than other cultivated lands, both nationally and locally. These lands are also associated with greater potential nutrient runoff and leaching compared with cultivated cropland nationally. Crop insurance subsidies and CRP have estimated effects on erosion and other environmental factors that are disproportionate to the acreage and production effects, but specific environmental impacts vary with the features of each program.","PeriodicalId":348588,"journal":{"name":"Economic Research Report","volume":"2013 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"110","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Economic Research Report","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22004/AG.ECON.33591","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 110

Abstract

This report examines evidence on the relationship between agricultural land-use changes, soil productivity, and indicators of environmental sensitivity. If cropland that shifts in and out of production is less productive and more environmentally sensitive than other cropland, policy-induced changes in land use could have production effects that are smaller-and environmental impacts that are greater-than anticipated. To illustrate this possibility, this report examines environmental outcomes stemming from landuse conversion caused by two agricultural programs that others have identified as potentially having important influences on land use and environmental quality: Federal crop insurance subsidies and the Conservation Reserve Program (CRP), the Nation's largest cropland retirement program. The report finds that lands moving between cultivated cropland and less intensive agricultural uses are, on average, less productive and more vulnerable to erosion than other cultivated lands, both nationally and locally. These lands are also associated with greater potential nutrient runoff and leaching compared with cultivated cropland nationally. Crop insurance subsidies and CRP have estimated effects on erosion and other environmental factors that are disproportionate to the acreage and production effects, but specific environmental impacts vary with the features of each program.
农业土地利用变化的环境影响:经济和政策的作用
本报告审查了有关农业土地利用变化、土壤生产力和环境敏感性指标之间关系的证据。如果转入和退出生产的耕地比其他耕地的生产力更低,对环境更敏感,那么政策引起的土地利用变化可能产生比预期更小的生产影响和更大的环境影响。为了说明这种可能性,本报告考察了由两个农业项目引起的土地利用转换所产生的环境后果,其他人认为这两个项目对土地利用和环境质量有潜在的重要影响:联邦作物保险补贴和保护储备计划(CRP),这是美国最大的耕地退休计划。该报告发现,在全国和地方范围内,与其他耕地相比,在耕地和集约化程度较低的农业用途之间流动的土地平均产量较低,更容易受到侵蚀。与全国的耕地相比,这些土地也有更大的潜在养分流失和淋失。作物保险补贴和CRP对侵蚀和其他环境因素的影响与种植面积和生产影响不成比例,但具体的环境影响因每个项目的特点而异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信