Penegakan Hukum HAM dalam Bingkai Hukum Progresif Berdasarkan Kasus Paniai di Papua

Rufaidah Rufaidah, Nanik Prasetyoningsih
{"title":"Penegakan Hukum HAM dalam Bingkai Hukum Progresif Berdasarkan Kasus Paniai di Papua","authors":"Rufaidah Rufaidah, Nanik Prasetyoningsih","doi":"10.18196/mls.v4i2.16","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In Indonesia, there is a need for a new legal breakthrough in the enforcement of human rights law. Progressive law can be used as a legal thought in enforcing human rights law. Considering progressive law is a law that does not rely on the text of the law alone but can be sourced from the values of people's lives. This study will discuss the Enforcement of Human Rights Law in a Progressive Legal Perspective. Efforts to enforce human rights law and protect human rights in Indonesia, apart from being regulated through regulations, can also be legally processed through human rights courts. The thing that underlies the urgency of the Progressive legal approach is that the judiciary, which is a justice enforcement agency, has not provided the best results in the justice enforcement process. What needs to be emphasized and underlined is that progressive law is different from other laws which prioritize strict procedures rather than prioritizing the objectives of the law itself. Enforcement of human rights law is often difficult, due to the many requirements and regulations as well as political dynamics that hinder the legal process for enforcing human rights law. Komnas HAM as an institution that has responsibility for the implementation of human rights law enforcement, preferably in the process of resolving human rights law, or seeking human rights justice, does not only build a legal rationale based on the positivistic paradigm.","PeriodicalId":272345,"journal":{"name":"Media of Law and Sharia","volume":"25 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Media of Law and Sharia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18196/mls.v4i2.16","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In Indonesia, there is a need for a new legal breakthrough in the enforcement of human rights law. Progressive law can be used as a legal thought in enforcing human rights law. Considering progressive law is a law that does not rely on the text of the law alone but can be sourced from the values of people's lives. This study will discuss the Enforcement of Human Rights Law in a Progressive Legal Perspective. Efforts to enforce human rights law and protect human rights in Indonesia, apart from being regulated through regulations, can also be legally processed through human rights courts. The thing that underlies the urgency of the Progressive legal approach is that the judiciary, which is a justice enforcement agency, has not provided the best results in the justice enforcement process. What needs to be emphasized and underlined is that progressive law is different from other laws which prioritize strict procedures rather than prioritizing the objectives of the law itself. Enforcement of human rights law is often difficult, due to the many requirements and regulations as well as political dynamics that hinder the legal process for enforcing human rights law. Komnas HAM as an institution that has responsibility for the implementation of human rights law enforcement, preferably in the process of resolving human rights law, or seeking human rights justice, does not only build a legal rationale based on the positivistic paradigm.
在一个以巴布亚为基础的进步法律框架内执行人权执法
在印度尼西亚,有必要在执行人权法方面取得新的法律突破。进步法可以作为执行人权法的一种法律思想。考虑到进步法是一种不仅仅依赖于法律文本,而是可以从人们的生活价值中获得来源的法律。本研究将从进步的法律视角探讨人权法的执行。在印度尼西亚执行人权法和保护人权的努力,除了通过条例加以规范外,还可以通过人权法院进行合法的处理。进步主义法律方法的紧迫性在于,作为司法执行机构的司法部门在司法执行过程中没有提供最好的结果。需要强调和强调的是,进步法不同于其他法律,它们优先考虑严格的程序,而不是优先考虑法律本身的目标。执行人权法往往很困难,因为许多要求和条例以及政治动态阻碍了执行人权法的法律程序。Komnas HAM作为一个有责任实施人权执法的机构,最好是在解决人权法或寻求人权正义的过程中,不仅建立了基于实证主义范式的法律理论基础。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信