DIFFERENCES IN PROFESSIONAL RESPONSIBILITY FOR STATUS AND ROLE IN THE WORKPLACE

{"title":"DIFFERENCES IN PROFESSIONAL RESPONSIBILITY FOR STATUS AND ROLE IN THE WORKPLACE","authors":"","doi":"10.37096/shdisj-20-1.1-0007","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The purpose of the study is to empirically substantiate the status and role differences in professional responsibility in the workplace. Methods: theoretical, empirical, mathematical statistics. Research results are based on the use of mathematical and statistical procedures, differences in the professional responsibility of workers with different status-role positions in the workplace are substantiated. These differences indicate, according to the authors, that leadership positions require greater responsibility, in contrast to the positions of subordinate personnel, since the head has the responsibility to regulate, control, organize, motivate, delegate the authority and activities of subordinates. It is shown that in comparison with subordinates, managers have a greater level of personal resources, a balance of their life achievements and failures, a higher adaptive potential and less stress vulnerability. \nThe presented results showed that among subordinates, but especially among managers, professional responsibility is most clearly manifested at the cognitive and behavioral levels, and to a lesser extent at the affective, emotional level. \nIn addition, it has been shown that managers are characterized by a significantly greater variety of socially determined career incentives, in particular, orientation to professional competence, management, autonomy, challenge, and entrepreneurship. Subordinates are more inclined to consider their work as service and are focused on the integration of various areas of their lives and on self-realization on this basis. \nThe results obtained suggest that the personal foundations of the subject of responsibility discovered by the authors, on the one hand, show the degree of “rooted” responsibility as a personality trait, and on the other hand, they are the most important mechanisms for the implementation of responsible human behavior in the workplace.","PeriodicalId":141832,"journal":{"name":"Socialization & Human Development: International Scientific Journal","volume":"224 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Socialization & Human Development: International Scientific Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.37096/shdisj-20-1.1-0007","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The purpose of the study is to empirically substantiate the status and role differences in professional responsibility in the workplace. Methods: theoretical, empirical, mathematical statistics. Research results are based on the use of mathematical and statistical procedures, differences in the professional responsibility of workers with different status-role positions in the workplace are substantiated. These differences indicate, according to the authors, that leadership positions require greater responsibility, in contrast to the positions of subordinate personnel, since the head has the responsibility to regulate, control, organize, motivate, delegate the authority and activities of subordinates. It is shown that in comparison with subordinates, managers have a greater level of personal resources, a balance of their life achievements and failures, a higher adaptive potential and less stress vulnerability. The presented results showed that among subordinates, but especially among managers, professional responsibility is most clearly manifested at the cognitive and behavioral levels, and to a lesser extent at the affective, emotional level. In addition, it has been shown that managers are characterized by a significantly greater variety of socially determined career incentives, in particular, orientation to professional competence, management, autonomy, challenge, and entrepreneurship. Subordinates are more inclined to consider their work as service and are focused on the integration of various areas of their lives and on self-realization on this basis. The results obtained suggest that the personal foundations of the subject of responsibility discovered by the authors, on the one hand, show the degree of “rooted” responsibility as a personality trait, and on the other hand, they are the most important mechanisms for the implementation of responsible human behavior in the workplace.
职场地位和角色的职业责任差异
本研究的目的是实证证实职场中职业责任的地位和角色差异。方法:理论、实证、数理统计。研究结果基于数学和统计程序的使用,证实了工作场所中不同身份角色职位的工人在职业责任方面的差异。根据作者的说法,这些差异表明,与下属人员的职位相比,领导职位需要承担更大的责任,因为领导者有责任调节、控制、组织、激励、授权下属的权力和活动。研究表明,与下属相比,管理者拥有更高的个人资源水平,能够平衡人生成就与失败,具有更高的适应潜力,更少的压力脆弱性。研究结果表明,在下属中,尤其是在管理者中,职业责任在认知和行为层面表现得最为明显,在情感和情绪层面表现得较少。此外,研究表明,管理者的特点是有更多种类的社会决定的职业激励,特别是对专业能力、管理、自主、挑战和企业家精神的倾向。下属更倾向于将自己的工作视为服务,注重生活各领域的整合,并在此基础上实现自我。所获得的结果表明,作者发现的责任主体的个人基础,一方面显示了责任作为一种人格特质的“根深蒂固”程度,另一方面,它们是在工作场所实施负责任的人类行为的最重要机制。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信