Legal Aspects of Intellectual Property Rights in Accreditation Instruments of Study Program Performance Reports

M. Masnun, Denial Ikram, Niken Nur Angeli Byfitia Saputri, Tasya Destinasari
{"title":"Legal Aspects of Intellectual Property Rights in Accreditation Instruments of Study Program Performance Reports","authors":"M. Masnun, Denial Ikram, Niken Nur Angeli Byfitia Saputri, Tasya Destinasari","doi":"10.2991/assehr.k.211223.093","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The purpose of this study is to analyze the legal aspects of IPR related to Study Program Performance Reports (LKPS) as one of the aspects of assessment in the study program accreditation instrument and is stipulated in PERBAN-PT No. 2 of 2019. LKPS requires a letter of determination in the form of a decree or certificate issued by Ministry of Law and Human Rights for the outcomes of research and community services (PKM). The research method uses normative research with the legislative approach and economic approach. The results showed that the characteristics are unique to each type of IPR, so the application of LKPS assessments related to intellectual property cannot be equated. Copyright, LKPS instruments do not need to be determined by the Ministry of Law and Human Rights. Patents, not all registered patents granted have been determined by the Ministry of Law and Human Rights can be used as an assessment, but also need to consider other aspects of cost and commercialization. Industrial design, terminology must definitely refer to \"industrial design\" not \"industrial product design\". Recommendations on the results of the study include: first, copyright needs to determine definitively the scope of which if necessary to obtain a letter of determination from the Ministry of Law and Human Rights. Secondly, aspects of patent appraisal are not limited to the determination but also aspects of cost and commercialization. Third, the terminology of industrial design and the scope of the assessment is more emphasized. In general, recommendations for the results of this study suggest that the LKPS instrument needs to be reviewed (reformulation).","PeriodicalId":233775,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the International Joint Conference on Arts and Humanities 2021 (IJCAH 2021)","volume":"9 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the International Joint Conference on Arts and Humanities 2021 (IJCAH 2021)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2991/assehr.k.211223.093","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to analyze the legal aspects of IPR related to Study Program Performance Reports (LKPS) as one of the aspects of assessment in the study program accreditation instrument and is stipulated in PERBAN-PT No. 2 of 2019. LKPS requires a letter of determination in the form of a decree or certificate issued by Ministry of Law and Human Rights for the outcomes of research and community services (PKM). The research method uses normative research with the legislative approach and economic approach. The results showed that the characteristics are unique to each type of IPR, so the application of LKPS assessments related to intellectual property cannot be equated. Copyright, LKPS instruments do not need to be determined by the Ministry of Law and Human Rights. Patents, not all registered patents granted have been determined by the Ministry of Law and Human Rights can be used as an assessment, but also need to consider other aspects of cost and commercialization. Industrial design, terminology must definitely refer to "industrial design" not "industrial product design". Recommendations on the results of the study include: first, copyright needs to determine definitively the scope of which if necessary to obtain a letter of determination from the Ministry of Law and Human Rights. Secondly, aspects of patent appraisal are not limited to the determination but also aspects of cost and commercialization. Third, the terminology of industrial design and the scope of the assessment is more emphasized. In general, recommendations for the results of this study suggest that the LKPS instrument needs to be reviewed (reformulation).
研究项目绩效报告认证工具中知识产权的法律方面
本研究的目的是分析与学习计划绩效报告(LKPS)相关的知识产权法律方面,LKPS是学习计划认证工具中评估的一个方面,并在2019年PERBAN-PT No. 2中规定。LKPS要求法律和人权部就研究和社区服务(PKM)的成果出具一份法令或证书形式的决定书。研究方法采用规范性研究,立法方法与经济学方法相结合。结果表明,每种知识产权的特征都是独一无二的,因此LKPS评估在知识产权相关领域的应用不能等同。版权、LKPS文书不需要由法律和人权部确定。专利方面,并非所有已注册的专利授权都已被法律和人权部确定可以作为评估依据,还需要考虑其他方面的成本和商业化。工业设计的术语一定是指“工业设计”而不是“工业产品设计”。关于研究结果的建议包括:首先,版权需要明确确定其范围,如有必要,应获得法律和人权部的确定函。其次,专利评估的内容不仅限于确定,还包括成本和商业化方面。第三,工业设计的术语和评估的范围更加强调。总的来说,对这项研究结果的建议表明,LKPS工具需要进行审查(重新制定)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信