Torn between Regional Supply and Globalisation: Austria's Primary Biomass Footprint for Energy in Comparison to Food and Material

Gerald Kalt, L. Kaufmann, Kastner Thomas, F. Krausmann
{"title":"Torn between Regional Supply and Globalisation: Austria's Primary Biomass Footprint for Energy in Comparison to Food and Material","authors":"Gerald Kalt, L. Kaufmann, Kastner Thomas, F. Krausmann","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3706649","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Global biomass trade for energy has risen sharply in recent decades, especially with regard to refined biofuels. This development was accompanied by increasing concerns about adverse environmental impacts in exporting countries. Criticism of the EU’s bioenergy policies is often connected to international trade, for example controversies surrounding direct and indirect land-use change, or regarding the carbon balance of wood pellets being imported as substitute for coal. In Austria, there is strong public support for bioenergy from domestic sources, while biomass imports are met with scepticism. Such preference for regional supply is also prevalent for food and biomass for material, where consumers tend to consider high degrees of national self-sufficiency as an indication that domestic supply predominates. We here investigate where biomass products and biofuels consumed in Austria actually originate from, and whether the import share of Austria’s bioenergy sector significantly differs from that of nutrition and material applications. We determine the source countries of primary biomass utilized for energy, food and material based on material flow analyses, process chain modelling and algorithms tracing imported biomass to original source regions. We find that globalized supply chains undermine efforts for regional supply regardless of the type of use. Still, biomass consumed for energy as well as food and material primarily originates from Austria and its neighbouring countries. Certain bioenergy carriers have relatively large primary biomass footprints in more distant countries and overseas (mainly oil crop-based biofuels) but overall, biomass for energy is more regional than food and material products.","PeriodicalId":320530,"journal":{"name":"SRPN: Biofuels (Topic)","volume":"25 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"SRPN: Biofuels (Topic)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3706649","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Global biomass trade for energy has risen sharply in recent decades, especially with regard to refined biofuels. This development was accompanied by increasing concerns about adverse environmental impacts in exporting countries. Criticism of the EU’s bioenergy policies is often connected to international trade, for example controversies surrounding direct and indirect land-use change, or regarding the carbon balance of wood pellets being imported as substitute for coal. In Austria, there is strong public support for bioenergy from domestic sources, while biomass imports are met with scepticism. Such preference for regional supply is also prevalent for food and biomass for material, where consumers tend to consider high degrees of national self-sufficiency as an indication that domestic supply predominates. We here investigate where biomass products and biofuels consumed in Austria actually originate from, and whether the import share of Austria’s bioenergy sector significantly differs from that of nutrition and material applications. We determine the source countries of primary biomass utilized for energy, food and material based on material flow analyses, process chain modelling and algorithms tracing imported biomass to original source regions. We find that globalized supply chains undermine efforts for regional supply regardless of the type of use. Still, biomass consumed for energy as well as food and material primarily originates from Austria and its neighbouring countries. Certain bioenergy carriers have relatively large primary biomass footprints in more distant countries and overseas (mainly oil crop-based biofuels) but overall, biomass for energy is more regional than food and material products.
在区域供应和全球化之间的撕裂:奥地利的主要生物质能源足迹与食品和材料的比较
近几十年来,全球生物质能源贸易急剧上升,尤其是精炼生物燃料。伴随这一发展而来的是对出口国不利环境影响的日益关注。对欧盟生物能源政策的批评通常与国际贸易有关,例如围绕直接和间接土地利用变化的争议,或者关于进口木屑颗粒作为煤炭替代品的碳平衡。在奥地利,公众强烈支持国内的生物能源,而生物质能进口则受到怀疑。这种对区域供应的偏好在粮食和材料的生物质方面也很普遍,消费者倾向于认为国家高度自给自足是国内供应占主导地位的迹象。我们在这里调查了奥地利消费的生物质产品和生物燃料的实际来源,以及奥地利生物能源部门的进口份额是否与营养和材料应用的进口份额显著不同。我们根据物料流分析、过程链建模和将进口生物质追踪到原始来源国的算法,确定了用于能源、食品和材料的初级生物质的来源国。我们发现,无论使用何种类型,全球化供应链都破坏了区域供应的努力。尽管如此,用于能源以及食品和材料的生物质主要来自奥地利及其邻国。某些生物能源载体在较遥远的国家和海外拥有相对较大的初级生物质足迹(主要是基于油料作物的生物燃料),但总体而言,生物质能源比粮食和材料产品更具区域性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信