Estimation of Potential Evapotranspiration for a Coastal Savannah Environment: Comparison of Methods

D. Asare, G. Banini, E. Ayeh, G. Amenorpe
{"title":"Estimation of Potential Evapotranspiration for a Coastal Savannah Environment: Comparison of Methods","authors":"D. Asare, G. Banini, E. Ayeh, G. Amenorpe","doi":"10.4314/JGSA.V13I1.69181","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Six potential evapotranspiration models namely, Penman-Monteith, Hargreaves-Samani , Priestley-Taylor, IRMAK1, IRMAK2 and TURC, were used to estimate daily PET values at Atomic-Kwabenya in the coastal savannah environment of Ghana for the year 2005. The study compared PET values generated by six models and identified which ones compared favourably with the Penman-Monteith model which is the recommended standard method for estimating PET. Cross comparison analysis showed that only the daily estimates of PET of Hargreaves-Samani model correlated reasonably (r = 0.82) with estimates by the Penman-Monteith model. Additionally, PET values by the Priestley-Taylor and TURC models were highly correlated (r = 0.99) as well as those generated by IRMAK2 and TURC models (r = 0.96). Statistical analysis, based on pair comparison of means, showed that daily PET estimates of the Penman-Monteith model were not different from the Priestley-Taylor model for the Kwabenya-Atomic area located in the coastal savannah environment of Ghana. The Priestley-Taylor model can be used, in place of the Penman-Monteith model, to estimate daily PET for the Atomic-Kwabenya area of the coastal savannah environment of Ghana. The Hargreaves-Samani model can also be used to estimate PET for the study area because its PET estimates correlated reasonably with those of the Penman-Monteith model (r = 0.82) and requires only air temperature measurements as in-puts.ac","PeriodicalId":301438,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the Ghana Science Association","volume":"40 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2011-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the Ghana Science Association","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4314/JGSA.V13I1.69181","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

Six potential evapotranspiration models namely, Penman-Monteith, Hargreaves-Samani , Priestley-Taylor, IRMAK1, IRMAK2 and TURC, were used to estimate daily PET values at Atomic-Kwabenya in the coastal savannah environment of Ghana for the year 2005. The study compared PET values generated by six models and identified which ones compared favourably with the Penman-Monteith model which is the recommended standard method for estimating PET. Cross comparison analysis showed that only the daily estimates of PET of Hargreaves-Samani model correlated reasonably (r = 0.82) with estimates by the Penman-Monteith model. Additionally, PET values by the Priestley-Taylor and TURC models were highly correlated (r = 0.99) as well as those generated by IRMAK2 and TURC models (r = 0.96). Statistical analysis, based on pair comparison of means, showed that daily PET estimates of the Penman-Monteith model were not different from the Priestley-Taylor model for the Kwabenya-Atomic area located in the coastal savannah environment of Ghana. The Priestley-Taylor model can be used, in place of the Penman-Monteith model, to estimate daily PET for the Atomic-Kwabenya area of the coastal savannah environment of Ghana. The Hargreaves-Samani model can also be used to estimate PET for the study area because its PET estimates correlated reasonably with those of the Penman-Monteith model (r = 0.82) and requires only air temperature measurements as in-puts.ac
沿海草原环境潜在蒸散量估算:方法比较
利用Penman-Monteith、Hargreaves-Samani、Priestley-Taylor、IRMAK1、IRMAK2和TURC 6个潜在蒸散模型估算了2005年加纳沿海大草原Atomic-Kwabenya地区的日PET值。该研究比较了六种模型产生的PET值,并确定了哪些模型与Penman-Monteith模型比较有利,Penman-Monteith模型是估计PET的推荐标准方法。交叉比较分析表明,只有Hargreaves-Samani模型的PET日估计值与Penman-Monteith模型的估计值具有合理的相关性(r = 0.82)。此外,Priestley-Taylor模型和TURC模型的PET值高度相关(r = 0.99), IRMAK2模型和TURC模型的PET值高度相关(r = 0.96)。基于均值对比较的统计分析表明,Penman-Monteith模型的日PET估计值与Priestley-Taylor模型对于位于加纳沿海大草原环境的Kwabenya-Atomic地区的估计值没有差异。Priestley-Taylor模型可以用来代替Penman-Monteith模型来估计加纳沿海大草原环境的Atomic-Kwabenya地区的每日PET。Hargreaves-Samani模型也可以用来估计研究区域的PET,因为它的PET估计与Penman-Monteith模型的PET估计有合理的相关性(r = 0.82),并且只需要空气温度测量作为输入
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信