Reduction of human agency in a technological context

E. Gavrilina
{"title":"Reduction of human agency in a technological context","authors":"E. Gavrilina","doi":"10.21146/2413-9084-2022-27-2-108-120","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Technological development and its impact are in the focus of attention of philosophers, sociologists, psychologists and economists for a long time. One of the first descriptions of the consequences of the development of technology was formed by Marx. This is a phenomenon of alienation, because of which a person becomes by some part of him- or herself like functional elements of technical system. This functionality and fragmentality can reduce his or her humanity, the part of it is, as known, our ability to act, including our goals and meanings. Thus, it can be shown that the reduction of human agency is associated with the systematic technological objectification of a person. On the other hand, more and more routine habitual actions, especially in the field of work, but also in other fields of activity, are delegated to technological devices, which can be considered as strengthening human objectification, alienation from one’s own goals and meanings. At the same time, the objectification of physicality, our body also occurs, which in a paradoxical way can lead to views that underlie modern transhumanistically oriented approaches. The article attempts to explicate this connection and show its influence on the reduction of human agency. Of course, this issue requires further theoretical study and discussions.","PeriodicalId":227944,"journal":{"name":"Philosophy of Science and Technology","volume":"15 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Philosophy of Science and Technology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21146/2413-9084-2022-27-2-108-120","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Technological development and its impact are in the focus of attention of philosophers, sociologists, psychologists and economists for a long time. One of the first descriptions of the consequences of the development of technology was formed by Marx. This is a phenomenon of alienation, because of which a person becomes by some part of him- or herself like functional elements of technical system. This functionality and fragmentality can reduce his or her humanity, the part of it is, as known, our ability to act, including our goals and meanings. Thus, it can be shown that the reduction of human agency is associated with the systematic technological objectification of a person. On the other hand, more and more routine habitual actions, especially in the field of work, but also in other fields of activity, are delegated to technological devices, which can be considered as strengthening human objectification, alienation from one’s own goals and meanings. At the same time, the objectification of physicality, our body also occurs, which in a paradoxical way can lead to views that underlie modern transhumanistically oriented approaches. The article attempts to explicate this connection and show its influence on the reduction of human agency. Of course, this issue requires further theoretical study and discussions.
技术环境下人类能动性的减少
长期以来,技术发展及其影响一直是哲学家、社会学家、心理学家和经济学家关注的焦点。最早对技术发展后果的描述之一是由马克思提出的。这是一种异化现象,人因此而被自身的某些部分变成了技术系统的功能要素。这种功能性和碎片性会减少他或她的人性,其中一部分是我们的行动能力,包括我们的目标和意义。因此,可以表明,人的能动性的减少与一个人的系统的技术客观化有关。另一方面,越来越多的日常习惯行为,特别是在工作领域,以及在其他活动领域,被委托给技术设备,这可以被认为是加强了人的客观化,异化了自己的目标和意义。与此同时,物质性的物化,我们的身体也发生了,这以一种矛盾的方式导致了现代超人类主义导向方法的观点。本文试图说明这种联系,并说明它对人的能动性降低的影响。当然,这个问题还需要进一步的理论研究和探讨。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信