Collaborative Fieldwork Supervision Model Supports Identified by Occupational Therapy Fieldwork Educators

Oaklee Rogers, Debra J Hanson, C. Graves, T. Turner, M. Klug
{"title":"Collaborative Fieldwork Supervision Model Supports Identified by Occupational Therapy Fieldwork Educators","authors":"Oaklee Rogers, Debra J Hanson, C. Graves, T. Turner, M. Klug","doi":"10.26681/jote.2023.070215","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Within the occupational therapy (OT) profession, the collaborative fieldwork supervision model is considered a non-traditional approach to fieldwork education. Although supportive strategies for fieldwork education have been developed, there is little data to validate fieldwork educators' perspectives on the value and helpfulness of these supports for this model. Using a mixed-methods research design, this study aimed to identify what supports influenced fieldwork educators to use the collaborative fieldwork supervision model, what supports are valued when implementing it, and what supports would be considered helpful for those who have not used it. A total of 382 fieldwork educators completed the study, with 113 who identified as model users and 269 who identified as model non-users. Four themes emerged from model users that influenced their decision to use the model: support from 1) fieldwork site context, 2) academic program, 3) student engagement, and 4) professional resources. Based on the study results, a four-part approach is recommended for educational programs to support the initiation and use of the collaborative fieldwork supervision model.","PeriodicalId":304291,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Occupational Therapy Education","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Occupational Therapy Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.26681/jote.2023.070215","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Within the occupational therapy (OT) profession, the collaborative fieldwork supervision model is considered a non-traditional approach to fieldwork education. Although supportive strategies for fieldwork education have been developed, there is little data to validate fieldwork educators' perspectives on the value and helpfulness of these supports for this model. Using a mixed-methods research design, this study aimed to identify what supports influenced fieldwork educators to use the collaborative fieldwork supervision model, what supports are valued when implementing it, and what supports would be considered helpful for those who have not used it. A total of 382 fieldwork educators completed the study, with 113 who identified as model users and 269 who identified as model non-users. Four themes emerged from model users that influenced their decision to use the model: support from 1) fieldwork site context, 2) academic program, 3) student engagement, and 4) professional resources. Based on the study results, a four-part approach is recommended for educational programs to support the initiation and use of the collaborative fieldwork supervision model.
职业治疗实习教育者认同的协同实习监督模式支持
在职业治疗(OT)专业中,协作实地工作监督模式被认为是一种非传统的实地工作教育方法。虽然已经制定了实地考察教育的支持策略,但很少有数据可以验证实地考察教育者对这些支持模式的价值和帮助的看法。采用混合方法的研究设计,本研究旨在确定哪些支持影响田野工作教育者使用协作田野工作监督模式,哪些支持在实施时是有价值的,以及哪些支持对那些没有使用它的人来说是有帮助的。共有382名实地教育工作者完成了这项研究,其中113人被确定为模范用户,269人被确定为模范非用户。四个主题从模型使用者中浮现出来,影响了他们使用模型的决定:1)现场工作环境的支持,2)学术课程,3)学生参与,以及4)专业资源。基于研究结果,建议教育计划采用四部分方法来支持协作实地考察监督模式的启动和使用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信