Confused vs Non-Confused Electroencephalography Signal Classification Using Deep Learning Algorithm

Z. Lim, Yong Li Neo
{"title":"Confused vs Non-Confused Electroencephalography Signal Classification Using Deep Learning Algorithm","authors":"Z. Lim, Yong Li Neo","doi":"10.1109/I2CACIS57635.2023.10193048","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"When students are doubtful or uncertain about a certain subject, they frequently face confusion. If students did not pose questions, it would be difficult for the teacher to see this circumstance. Eventually, this will slow down the pupils’ learning development and impact their academic performance. While confusion is a mental state, it is proposed to utilise the electroencephalogram (EEG) signal to evaluate if a pupil is confused or not. Unfortunately, it is challenging to distinguish between a confused and non-confused EEG signal based on basic characteristics like as frequency domain and power spectral density. As technology progresses, deep learning in artificial intelligence is currently a prevalent technique. Thus, this research aimed to run a series of experiments to determine which deep learning model is the best at classifying EEG signals as confused or not confused. The results indicate that the hybrid CNN-biLSTM deep learning model is superior to the six other deep learning models included in this study. In identifying the EEG signals of confused and non-confused pupils, it obtains an AUC of 82%, 76.7% accuracy, 76.9% recall rate (76.9%), 71.4% precision, and 76.5% specificity. The dependability of the hybrid CNN-biLSTM deep neural network indicates that it has the potential to be utilised in the classroom in the future to identify whether a student is confused or has fully grasped the curriculum that the teacher has taught. This can guarantee that the teacher efficiently transferred knowledge to the pupil.","PeriodicalId":244595,"journal":{"name":"2023 IEEE International Conference on Automatic Control and Intelligent Systems (I2CACIS)","volume":"28 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2023 IEEE International Conference on Automatic Control and Intelligent Systems (I2CACIS)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/I2CACIS57635.2023.10193048","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

When students are doubtful or uncertain about a certain subject, they frequently face confusion. If students did not pose questions, it would be difficult for the teacher to see this circumstance. Eventually, this will slow down the pupils’ learning development and impact their academic performance. While confusion is a mental state, it is proposed to utilise the electroencephalogram (EEG) signal to evaluate if a pupil is confused or not. Unfortunately, it is challenging to distinguish between a confused and non-confused EEG signal based on basic characteristics like as frequency domain and power spectral density. As technology progresses, deep learning in artificial intelligence is currently a prevalent technique. Thus, this research aimed to run a series of experiments to determine which deep learning model is the best at classifying EEG signals as confused or not confused. The results indicate that the hybrid CNN-biLSTM deep learning model is superior to the six other deep learning models included in this study. In identifying the EEG signals of confused and non-confused pupils, it obtains an AUC of 82%, 76.7% accuracy, 76.9% recall rate (76.9%), 71.4% precision, and 76.5% specificity. The dependability of the hybrid CNN-biLSTM deep neural network indicates that it has the potential to be utilised in the classroom in the future to identify whether a student is confused or has fully grasped the curriculum that the teacher has taught. This can guarantee that the teacher efficiently transferred knowledge to the pupil.
使用深度学习算法的混淆与非混淆脑电图信号分类
当学生对某一主题感到怀疑或不确定时,他们经常面临困惑。如果学生没有提出问题,老师就很难看到这种情况。最终,这将减缓学生的学习发展,影响他们的学习成绩。虽然困惑是一种精神状态,但建议利用脑电图(EEG)信号来评估学生是否存在困惑。不幸的是,基于频域和功率谱密度等基本特征来区分混淆和非混淆脑电信号是一项挑战。随着技术的进步,人工智能领域的深度学习是目前流行的技术。因此,本研究旨在进行一系列实验,以确定哪种深度学习模型在将EEG信号分类为混淆或不混淆方面效果最好。结果表明,CNN-biLSTM混合深度学习模型优于本研究中包含的其他六种深度学习模型。识别混淆和非混淆瞳孔的EEG信号,AUC为82%,准确率为76.7%,查全率为76.9%(76.9%),准确率为71.4%,特异性为76.5%。混合CNN-biLSTM深度神经网络的可靠性表明,它有可能在未来的课堂上用于识别学生是困惑还是完全掌握了老师所教的课程。这可以保证教师有效地将知识传递给学生。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信