Risk Identification and Management in Construction Projects: Literature Review

Shubham Sharma, A. Gupta
{"title":"Risk Identification and Management in Construction Projects: Literature Review","authors":"Shubham Sharma, A. Gupta","doi":"10.20469/ijhss.5.20002-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":": The significance of risk management has increased in the last few years, and the Critical Risk Factors (CRFs) have attained more attention from the construction industry practitioners. Huge and complicated construction projects contain a lot of risk factors, and the completion of these projects relies on the proper management of the main risks. This paper identifies the critical risk factors associated with construction projects along with the most commonly used risk identification techniques and methods of classifying risks. For this study, a total of sixty-seven risk factors were identified through an in-depth content analysis of the literature. The method used for ranking critical risks, risk identification techniques, and classifying risk was based on the number of articles considering that particular risk, technique, and method. The top five identified risks were unavailability of funds, design errors & poor engineering, poor site management & supervision, contractual risks, change in laws and regulations. The most commonly used risk identification technique and method of classifying risk was the questionnaire survey and nature of the risk. The research findings are helpful to engineers, supervisors, project managers, and construction practitioners for early assessment and proper management of risks present in construction projects. of risk in the construction projects. The assessment was done on multi-attribute decision-making methods. In this paper, the risk was divided into three groups- external, project, internal. Only those risk attributes were selected that affect the construction and real estate industry. TOPIS grey and COPRAS-G methods were used for ranking and determining the optimality of different attributes. The proposed model can be used for avoiding negative impacts and increasing the chances of positive outcomes. Decision making has an significant role in construction management. The results of the research show different levels of construction projects and if a risk assessment is done properly, loses can be minimized.","PeriodicalId":180368,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Humanities, Arts and Social Sciences","volume":"15 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-12-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"8","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Humanities, Arts and Social Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.20469/ijhss.5.20002-6","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 8

Abstract

: The significance of risk management has increased in the last few years, and the Critical Risk Factors (CRFs) have attained more attention from the construction industry practitioners. Huge and complicated construction projects contain a lot of risk factors, and the completion of these projects relies on the proper management of the main risks. This paper identifies the critical risk factors associated with construction projects along with the most commonly used risk identification techniques and methods of classifying risks. For this study, a total of sixty-seven risk factors were identified through an in-depth content analysis of the literature. The method used for ranking critical risks, risk identification techniques, and classifying risk was based on the number of articles considering that particular risk, technique, and method. The top five identified risks were unavailability of funds, design errors & poor engineering, poor site management & supervision, contractual risks, change in laws and regulations. The most commonly used risk identification technique and method of classifying risk was the questionnaire survey and nature of the risk. The research findings are helpful to engineers, supervisors, project managers, and construction practitioners for early assessment and proper management of risks present in construction projects. of risk in the construction projects. The assessment was done on multi-attribute decision-making methods. In this paper, the risk was divided into three groups- external, project, internal. Only those risk attributes were selected that affect the construction and real estate industry. TOPIS grey and COPRAS-G methods were used for ranking and determining the optimality of different attributes. The proposed model can be used for avoiding negative impacts and increasing the chances of positive outcomes. Decision making has an significant role in construction management. The results of the research show different levels of construction projects and if a risk assessment is done properly, loses can be minimized.
建设项目风险识别与管理:文献综述
在过去的几年里,风险管理的重要性日益增加,而关键风险因素(CRFs)也越来越受到建造业从业者的关注。庞大而复杂的建设项目包含着很多风险因素,这些项目的完成有赖于对主要风险的有效管理。本文确定了与建设项目相关的关键风险因素,以及最常用的风险识别技术和风险分类方法。在本研究中,通过对文献进行深入的内容分析,共确定了67个风险因素。用于对关键风险、风险识别技术和风险分类的方法是基于考虑该特定风险、技术和方法的文章数量。排名前五的风险是:资金不足、设计错误和工程质量差、现场管理和监督差、合同风险、法律法规变化。最常用的风险识别技术和风险分类方法是问卷调查和风险的性质。研究结果有助于工程师、监理、项目经理和施工人员对施工项目中存在的风险进行早期评估和适当管理。建设项目中的风险。对多属性决策方法进行了评价。本文将风险分为外部风险、项目风险和内部风险三大类。只有那些影响建筑和房地产行业的风险属性被选中。采用TOPIS灰色法和COPRAS-G方法对不同属性进行排序,确定其最优性。所提出的模型可用于避免负面影响和增加积极结果的机会。决策在施工管理中具有重要的作用。研究结果表明,不同层次的建设项目,如果风险评估做得好,损失可以降到最低。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信