Values and aims of the leading universities of the German-speaking countries

K. Szewior
{"title":"Values and aims of the leading universities of the German-speaking countries","authors":"K. Szewior","doi":"10.31338/1641-2478pe.3.21.13","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article is based on the research integrating qualitative approach and the content analysis method. The aim is to analyse the mission and strategy of the higher education institutions, assuming that through the mission and strategy those institutions express their self-identification, describe their current state and indicate the directions of development. The subject of the analysis is the best higher education institutions of the German-speaking countries, operating in national and international environment. The research was based on the content analysis, and on its basis, the values and aims of each university were indicated, and then – using the bottom–up method – the aggregation of the universities’ areas of activities were done. In this sense, the selected scopes of activities and points of focus may constitute a generalised reference to the other universities and to the entire academic community in the studied countries. The analysis of the various types of the universities (full, technical, medical) did not demonstrate any significant differences in their self-identification and the designation of the functions of the university, despite the differences in the language of description and the breadth of the offered career perspectives. The common origin, and cultural and social context were also the important factors in this research. The analised higher education institutions were much more oriented towards the standards defined by the best universities in the world and the global challenges of civilisation, what allowed them to become the leading institutions in innovation and technology transfer to the economy. Nowadays, the investigated universities represent the highest standards of academic knowledge. At the same time, they express contemporary trends and requirements of a business organisation (e.g. transparency, evaluation, knowledge management, inclusiveness). Moreover, the investigated higher education institutions perceive themselves as the socially responsible universities, what is confirmed by such values as: inclusiveness, gender mainstreaming, and sustainable development","PeriodicalId":229183,"journal":{"name":"Przegląd europejski","volume":"89 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-11-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Przegląd europejski","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31338/1641-2478pe.3.21.13","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This article is based on the research integrating qualitative approach and the content analysis method. The aim is to analyse the mission and strategy of the higher education institutions, assuming that through the mission and strategy those institutions express their self-identification, describe their current state and indicate the directions of development. The subject of the analysis is the best higher education institutions of the German-speaking countries, operating in national and international environment. The research was based on the content analysis, and on its basis, the values and aims of each university were indicated, and then – using the bottom–up method – the aggregation of the universities’ areas of activities were done. In this sense, the selected scopes of activities and points of focus may constitute a generalised reference to the other universities and to the entire academic community in the studied countries. The analysis of the various types of the universities (full, technical, medical) did not demonstrate any significant differences in their self-identification and the designation of the functions of the university, despite the differences in the language of description and the breadth of the offered career perspectives. The common origin, and cultural and social context were also the important factors in this research. The analised higher education institutions were much more oriented towards the standards defined by the best universities in the world and the global challenges of civilisation, what allowed them to become the leading institutions in innovation and technology transfer to the economy. Nowadays, the investigated universities represent the highest standards of academic knowledge. At the same time, they express contemporary trends and requirements of a business organisation (e.g. transparency, evaluation, knowledge management, inclusiveness). Moreover, the investigated higher education institutions perceive themselves as the socially responsible universities, what is confirmed by such values as: inclusiveness, gender mainstreaming, and sustainable development
德语国家主要大学的价值观和目标
本文是在定性方法和内容分析法相结合的研究基础上进行的。目的是分析高等教育机构的使命和战略,假设高等教育机构通过使命和战略表达自我认同,描述自身现状,指明发展方向。分析的主题是在国内和国际环境中运作的德语国家最好的高等教育机构。本研究以内容分析为基础,在内容分析的基础上,指出各大学的价值和目标,然后采用自下而上的方法对各大学的活动领域进行汇总。从这个意义上说,选定的活动范围和重点可能构成对所研究国家的其他大学和整个学术界的一般性参考。对各种类型的大学(综合、技术、医学)的分析显示,尽管在描述语言和提供的职业前景的广度方面存在差异,但在自我认同和大学职能的指定方面没有任何重大差异。共同的起源,文化和社会背景也是本研究的重要因素。所分析的高等教育机构更倾向于世界上最好的大学所定义的标准和文明的全球挑战,这使它们成为创新和技术转移到经济中的领先机构。如今,被调查的大学代表了学术知识的最高标准。与此同时,它们表达了商业组织的当代趋势和要求(例如透明度,评估,知识管理,包容性)。此外,被调查的高等教育机构认为自己是具有社会责任感的大学,这一点得到了包容性、性别主流化和可持续发展等价值观的证实
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信