A Comparison Study of Deep Learning Algorithms for Metasurface Harvester Designs

H. A. Ajmi, M. Bait-Suwailam, L. Khriji
{"title":"A Comparison Study of Deep Learning Algorithms for Metasurface Harvester Designs","authors":"H. A. Ajmi, M. Bait-Suwailam, L. Khriji","doi":"10.1109/ICCNS58795.2023.10193585","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The paper compares three deep learning artificial intelligence algorithms used for metasurface design. In-house design code for designing metasurface structures was developed with Python, the NumPy library. To facilitate the study, the three algorithms used are AdaBelief, Adam, and Yogi. According to the numerical comparison study, Adam has a better performance in terms of model generalization with a large dataset (in our case 7000 samples), while Adabelief and Yogi show a better performance in terms of a low dataset (in our case 4,000 samples), and Yogi has a better performance with a lower dataset correlation between the predicted performance of the energy harvester obtained from three algorithms. Yogi and Adablief performance could be improved by manipulating the hyper-parameters.","PeriodicalId":158016,"journal":{"name":"2023 International Conference on Intelligent Computing, Communication, Networking and Services (ICCNS)","volume":"42 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2023 International Conference on Intelligent Computing, Communication, Networking and Services (ICCNS)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICCNS58795.2023.10193585","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The paper compares three deep learning artificial intelligence algorithms used for metasurface design. In-house design code for designing metasurface structures was developed with Python, the NumPy library. To facilitate the study, the three algorithms used are AdaBelief, Adam, and Yogi. According to the numerical comparison study, Adam has a better performance in terms of model generalization with a large dataset (in our case 7000 samples), while Adabelief and Yogi show a better performance in terms of a low dataset (in our case 4,000 samples), and Yogi has a better performance with a lower dataset correlation between the predicted performance of the energy harvester obtained from three algorithms. Yogi and Adablief performance could be improved by manipulating the hyper-parameters.
深度学习算法在超表面采集器设计中的比较研究
本文比较了三种用于元表面设计的深度学习人工智能算法。设计元表面结构的内部设计代码是用Python (NumPy库)开发的。为了便于研究,使用的三种算法是adabbelief、Adam和Yogi。通过数值对比研究,Adam在大数据集(在我们的案例中为7000个样本)的模型泛化方面表现更好,而Adabelief和Yogi在小数据集(在我们的案例中为4000个样本)的模型泛化方面表现更好,Yogi在三种算法获得的能量采集器预测性能之间的数据集相关性较低的情况下表现更好。Yogi和adabef的性能可以通过操纵超参数来提高。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书