Literature in Language Teaching: Teacher Versus Student Opinions

V. Kalnbērziņa, Dina Savlovska
{"title":"Literature in Language Teaching: Teacher Versus Student Opinions","authors":"V. Kalnbērziņa, Dina Savlovska","doi":"10.22364/lincs.2023.02","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Literary texts are returning to school curricula, albeit in a different format: digital and multimodal, in the form of audiobooks and films. Although the theoreticians like Ghosn (2002) and Khatib, Rezaei and Derakhshan (2011) have reminded us about the value of literary text in a language learning curriculum of advanced levels, the views in the classrooms differ as we can see in Ghazali, Setia, Muthusamy and Jusoff, (2009) research on the student and teacher reaction to the use of literature in language learning. Since Latvia is also undergoing curriculum reform, which introduces literary texts in language learning, this research aims at comparing the views of teachers and students on the use of literary texts. The content analysis of the teacher response suggests that their opinions on the benefits of reading literary texts are closer than they realise. The students, just like the teachers, do see the value of literary texts in studying language, learning about culture and developing thinking skills.","PeriodicalId":414705,"journal":{"name":"Language for International Communication: Linking Interdisciplinary Perspectives: Language for Specific Purposes in the Era of Multilingualism and Technologies. Volume 4","volume":"214 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Language for International Communication: Linking Interdisciplinary Perspectives: Language for Specific Purposes in the Era of Multilingualism and Technologies. Volume 4","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22364/lincs.2023.02","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Literary texts are returning to school curricula, albeit in a different format: digital and multimodal, in the form of audiobooks and films. Although the theoreticians like Ghosn (2002) and Khatib, Rezaei and Derakhshan (2011) have reminded us about the value of literary text in a language learning curriculum of advanced levels, the views in the classrooms differ as we can see in Ghazali, Setia, Muthusamy and Jusoff, (2009) research on the student and teacher reaction to the use of literature in language learning. Since Latvia is also undergoing curriculum reform, which introduces literary texts in language learning, this research aims at comparing the views of teachers and students on the use of literary texts. The content analysis of the teacher response suggests that their opinions on the benefits of reading literary texts are closer than they realise. The students, just like the teachers, do see the value of literary texts in studying language, learning about culture and developing thinking skills.
语文教学中的文学:教师与学生的观点
文学文本正在重返学校课程,尽管是以一种不同的形式:数字和多模式,以有声读物和电影的形式。尽管Ghosn(2002)和Khatib、Rezaei和Derakhshan(2011)等理论家提醒我们文学文本在高级语言学习课程中的价值,但课堂上的观点不同,正如我们在Ghazali、Setia、Muthusamy和Jusoff(2009)关于学生和教师对在语言学习中使用文学的反应的研究中看到的那样。由于拉脱维亚也在进行课程改革,在语言学习中引入文学文本,本研究旨在比较教师和学生对文学文本使用的看法。对教师回应的内容分析表明,他们对阅读文学文本的好处的看法比他们意识到的更接近。和老师一样,学生们也看到了文学作品在学习语言、了解文化和培养思维能力方面的价值。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信