Who Tells Your Story

S. Stocco
{"title":"Who Tells Your Story","authors":"S. Stocco","doi":"10.24908/lhps.v1i1.15470","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Debuting in 2015, Lin-Manuel Miranda’s Broadway musical Hamilton was an instant success because of its unique interpretation of American history. The historical alteration that has made Hamilton so popular is the casting of America’s founding fathers all as men of color. All actors, with the exception of two, are people of colour, which makes Hamilton a welcome display of diversity on the Broadway stage. This modern casting choice has caught the attention of many critics, raising questions concerning the nature of artistic works versus historical works. This racially diverse casting choice is not accidental, and yet the same attention to diversity is not given to the play’s characters and plot. The visual diversity on stage conceals the fact that Hamilton is another example of the glorification of white men that simultaneously erases the presence and struggles of people of colour throughout American history. While the hip hop culture that structures the musical may appear to engage with a more diverse America, Hamilton is still using a concept of colored culture that is a form of reactionary masculinity to toxic Euro-American gender standards; the modern rap masculinity on stage is the same toxic masculinity as the oppressive white masculinity in history. The racially diverse cast and music that appear forward-thinking only conceal that Hamilton is yet another celebration of exclusively white American history that promotes the Euro-American construct of domineering masculinity.","PeriodicalId":118026,"journal":{"name":"Living Histories: A Past Studies Journal","volume":"10 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Living Histories: A Past Studies Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.24908/lhps.v1i1.15470","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Debuting in 2015, Lin-Manuel Miranda’s Broadway musical Hamilton was an instant success because of its unique interpretation of American history. The historical alteration that has made Hamilton so popular is the casting of America’s founding fathers all as men of color. All actors, with the exception of two, are people of colour, which makes Hamilton a welcome display of diversity on the Broadway stage. This modern casting choice has caught the attention of many critics, raising questions concerning the nature of artistic works versus historical works. This racially diverse casting choice is not accidental, and yet the same attention to diversity is not given to the play’s characters and plot. The visual diversity on stage conceals the fact that Hamilton is another example of the glorification of white men that simultaneously erases the presence and struggles of people of colour throughout American history. While the hip hop culture that structures the musical may appear to engage with a more diverse America, Hamilton is still using a concept of colored culture that is a form of reactionary masculinity to toxic Euro-American gender standards; the modern rap masculinity on stage is the same toxic masculinity as the oppressive white masculinity in history. The racially diverse cast and music that appear forward-thinking only conceal that Hamilton is yet another celebration of exclusively white American history that promotes the Euro-American construct of domineering masculinity.
谁讲述你的故事
2015年,林-曼努埃尔·米兰达的百老汇音乐剧《汉密尔顿》首次亮相,因其对美国历史的独特诠释而迅速获得成功。使《汉密尔顿》如此受欢迎的历史变化是,美国的开国元勋们都是有色人种。除了两位演员外,所有演员都是有色人种,这使得《汉密尔顿》成为百老汇舞台上受欢迎的多元化展示。这种现代的演员选择引起了许多评论家的注意,引发了关于艺术作品与历史作品本质的问题。这种种族多元化的演员选择并非偶然,然而对多样性的关注却没有同样地体现在剧中的角色和情节上。舞台上的视觉多样性掩盖了一个事实,即汉密尔顿是另一个颂扬白人男性的例子,同时抹去了美国历史上有色人种的存在和斗争。虽然构成音乐剧的嘻哈文化似乎与一个更多元化的美国有联系,但汉密尔顿仍然使用有色人种文化的概念,这是一种对有毒的欧美性别标准的反动男性气概的形式;舞台上的现代说唱男子气概与历史上压迫性白人男子气概是一样的有毒男子气概。种族多元化的演员阵容和音乐似乎具有前瞻性,但却掩盖了一个事实,那就是《汉密尔顿》是对美国白人历史的又一次庆祝,它促进了欧美人对霸道男子气概的建构。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信