Typology of an Elegic Artistic Modus in Russian Rhetorics and Poetics of the 18th Century

N. Volik, Olena Pedchenko
{"title":"Typology of an Elegic Artistic Modus in Russian Rhetorics and Poetics of the 18th Century","authors":"N. Volik, Olena Pedchenko","doi":"10.34079/2226-3055-2021-14-25-25-33","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The genre of elegy realizes the need to express feelings, emotions by 18th century poets in Russian literature of the. It becomes reflective and is different in non-canonical form and in communicative approach. The Modus of artistry in elegy allows us to analyze the genesis and formation of its genre. It is possible to determine the main genre characteristics of elegy based on theoretical sources of this period. We can get rid of the void in scientific theory regarding the subordination of elegy to rhetorical instructions. The appearance of elegy in Russian literature falls on the reflex-traditionalist (classical) era, which at the turn of the XVIII–XIX centuries is replaced by a new non-rhetorical era. It creates an idea of the genre as a modus of artistry. The elegiac genre differs in thematic and tonal diversity, demonstrates the flexibility of form. Elegiac modus is characterized by tragic content, unsustainable pattern and emotional focus of the persona on their own worries. The main features of elegy are realized through elegiac motifs, personas, plot, chronotope, communicative strategy and worldview. The sad tone of the elegiac modus implies a rather diverse structural and thematic classification, and ancient history reproduces the independence of the genre form of Elegy from the canons. Specific features of the elegiac modus are the Alexandrian verse, the elegiac Topos, the situation when a person finds himself in the face of time and death, the elegiac contradiction of a person with fleeting time. The most significant works for the formation and development of the genre of Russian elegy should be considered the works on rhetoric and poetics by Feofan Prokopovich, V. Trediakovsky, A. Sumarokov and M. Lomonosov. Feofan Prokopovich emphasizes the absence of an elegiac composition and the presence of a wide range of moods. The scientist suggests transmitting the joyful, angry, mournful, loving moods in elegies. V. Trediakovsky distinguishes between erotic and funeral types of elegies. He believes that the main genre feature of the elegiac mode is the content, emphasizes the rational nature of creativity and the presence of certain rhetorical laws. A. Sumarokov defends the sincerity of feelings with which the poet fills the content of the love elegy. M. Lomonosov calls the Elegy a middle genre in relation to stylistic theory, which is supported by almost all scientists. The study of the elegiac genre allows us to research the Russian elegy of the reflexive era in the aspect of artistic mode as a discursive practice. It will expand our horizons by analyzing the elegiac works of other authors in 18th century.","PeriodicalId":228347,"journal":{"name":"Vìsnik Marìupolʹsʹkogo deržavnogo unìversitetu Serìâ Fìlologìâ","volume":"4 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Vìsnik Marìupolʹsʹkogo deržavnogo unìversitetu Serìâ Fìlologìâ","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.34079/2226-3055-2021-14-25-25-33","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The genre of elegy realizes the need to express feelings, emotions by 18th century poets in Russian literature of the. It becomes reflective and is different in non-canonical form and in communicative approach. The Modus of artistry in elegy allows us to analyze the genesis and formation of its genre. It is possible to determine the main genre characteristics of elegy based on theoretical sources of this period. We can get rid of the void in scientific theory regarding the subordination of elegy to rhetorical instructions. The appearance of elegy in Russian literature falls on the reflex-traditionalist (classical) era, which at the turn of the XVIII–XIX centuries is replaced by a new non-rhetorical era. It creates an idea of the genre as a modus of artistry. The elegiac genre differs in thematic and tonal diversity, demonstrates the flexibility of form. Elegiac modus is characterized by tragic content, unsustainable pattern and emotional focus of the persona on their own worries. The main features of elegy are realized through elegiac motifs, personas, plot, chronotope, communicative strategy and worldview. The sad tone of the elegiac modus implies a rather diverse structural and thematic classification, and ancient history reproduces the independence of the genre form of Elegy from the canons. Specific features of the elegiac modus are the Alexandrian verse, the elegiac Topos, the situation when a person finds himself in the face of time and death, the elegiac contradiction of a person with fleeting time. The most significant works for the formation and development of the genre of Russian elegy should be considered the works on rhetoric and poetics by Feofan Prokopovich, V. Trediakovsky, A. Sumarokov and M. Lomonosov. Feofan Prokopovich emphasizes the absence of an elegiac composition and the presence of a wide range of moods. The scientist suggests transmitting the joyful, angry, mournful, loving moods in elegies. V. Trediakovsky distinguishes between erotic and funeral types of elegies. He believes that the main genre feature of the elegiac mode is the content, emphasizes the rational nature of creativity and the presence of certain rhetorical laws. A. Sumarokov defends the sincerity of feelings with which the poet fills the content of the love elegy. M. Lomonosov calls the Elegy a middle genre in relation to stylistic theory, which is supported by almost all scientists. The study of the elegiac genre allows us to research the Russian elegy of the reflexive era in the aspect of artistic mode as a discursive practice. It will expand our horizons by analyzing the elegiac works of other authors in 18th century.
18世纪俄罗斯修辞学和诗学中悲歌艺术方式的类型学
哀歌体裁实现了18世纪俄国诗人抒发情感、抒发情感的需要。它变得反思性,在非规范形式和交际方式上有所不同。挽歌的艺术手法可以让我们分析挽歌体裁的起源和形成。根据这一时期的理论来源,可以确定哀歌的主要体裁特征。我们可以摆脱科学理论中关于挽歌从属于修辞指示的空白。挽歌在俄罗斯文学中的出现落在反思-传统主义(古典)时代,在十八-十九世纪之交被一个新的非修辞时代所取代。它创造了一种流派作为一种艺术模式的想法。哀歌体裁在主题和音调的多样性上有所不同,表现出形式的灵活性。哀歌模式的特点是悲剧性的内容,不可持续的模式和情感焦点的人物对自己的担忧。哀歌的主要特征是通过哀歌母题、人物形象、情节、时间点、交际策略和世界观来实现的。哀歌模式的悲凉基调暗示着一种相当多样化的结构和主题分类,古代历史再现了哀歌体裁形式独立于经典的独立性。挽歌模式的具体特征是亚历山大诗,挽歌的主题,当一个人发现自己面对时间和死亡的情况,一个人与飞逝的时间的挽歌矛盾。对俄罗斯哀歌流派的形成和发展最重要的作品应该是普罗科波维奇、特雷迪亚科夫斯基、苏马罗科夫和罗蒙诺索夫的修辞学和诗学著作。费奥凡·普罗科波维奇强调没有哀歌的构图,而是有各种各样的情绪。这位科学家建议在挽歌中传递喜悦、愤怒、悲伤和爱的情绪。特雷迪亚科夫斯基区分了情色哀歌和丧葬哀歌。他认为哀歌模式的主要体裁特征是内容,强调创作的理性本质和一定修辞规律的存在。A. Sumarokov为真挚的感情辩护,诗人用真挚的感情填满了爱情挽歌的内容。罗蒙诺索夫先生称挽歌是一种与文体理论相关的中间体裁,几乎所有的科学家都支持这一观点。通过对哀歌体裁的研究,我们可以将反思时代的俄罗斯哀歌作为一种话语实践,从艺术模式的角度进行研究。通过分析18世纪其他作家的挽歌作品,拓宽了我们的视野。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信