The traumatizing politics of transitional justice policies: the Macedonian case of lustration

Ilo Trajkovski
{"title":"The traumatizing politics of transitional justice policies: the Macedonian case of lustration","authors":"Ilo Trajkovski","doi":"10.47054/sr171039t","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This contribution analyzes the political aspects of the ways in which the Republic of Macedonia deals with some traumatic fragments of its history. The main object of analysis are the measures (policies) undertaken by the state aimed at dealing with the effects of traumatic experiences of Macedonian citizens from the communist persecutions (during the communist period and immediately after the independence). The analysis argues that, by politicizing certain limited traumatic experiences, the political circles traumatize transitional justice policies. They transpose individual and generational traumatic experiences into collective and memorable trauma. Thus, instead of a politics of truth and forgiveness (without forgetting) in the name of building a common future, transitional justice works as a politics of retaliation, i.e. as politics of fear, of a possible unforeseen future of approved and unpunished violence. Theoretically, this interpretation of the Macedonian transitional justice relies on the political-sociological concept of trauma. According to this concept, for understanding the trauma and especially the traumatic syndrome, the trust in the institutions of power is of crucial importance, and in this case, in the institutions of political power of the Republic of Macedonia. Seen from this perspective, the policies for dealing with traumatic experiences and the subsequent transitional justice appear mainly as issues of the political unity in the Republic of Macedonia.","PeriodicalId":123530,"journal":{"name":"Социолошка ревија/The Sociological review","volume":"53 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Социолошка ревија/The Sociological review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.47054/sr171039t","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This contribution analyzes the political aspects of the ways in which the Republic of Macedonia deals with some traumatic fragments of its history. The main object of analysis are the measures (policies) undertaken by the state aimed at dealing with the effects of traumatic experiences of Macedonian citizens from the communist persecutions (during the communist period and immediately after the independence). The analysis argues that, by politicizing certain limited traumatic experiences, the political circles traumatize transitional justice policies. They transpose individual and generational traumatic experiences into collective and memorable trauma. Thus, instead of a politics of truth and forgiveness (without forgetting) in the name of building a common future, transitional justice works as a politics of retaliation, i.e. as politics of fear, of a possible unforeseen future of approved and unpunished violence. Theoretically, this interpretation of the Macedonian transitional justice relies on the political-sociological concept of trauma. According to this concept, for understanding the trauma and especially the traumatic syndrome, the trust in the institutions of power is of crucial importance, and in this case, in the institutions of political power of the Republic of Macedonia. Seen from this perspective, the policies for dealing with traumatic experiences and the subsequent transitional justice appear mainly as issues of the political unity in the Republic of Macedonia.
过渡时期司法政策的创伤性政治:马其顿的例证
这篇文章分析了马其顿共和国处理其历史上一些创伤片段的方式的政治方面。分析的主要对象是国家采取的措施(政策),旨在处理马其顿公民遭受共产主义迫害的创伤经历的影响(在共产主义时期和独立后)。分析认为,通过政治化特定创伤经历有限,政界的破坏过渡司法政策。他们将个人和世代的创伤经历转化为集体的、难忘的创伤。因此,在建立共同未来的名义下,过渡司法不是真理和宽恕的政治(没有忘记),而是作为报复的政治,即作为恐惧的政治,作为一个可能的不可预见的未来的批准和不受惩罚的暴力的政治。理论上,这种对马其顿过渡司法的解释依赖于创伤的政治社会学概念。根据这个概念,为了理解创伤,尤其是创伤综合症,对权力机构的信任是至关重要的,在这种情况下,对马其顿共和国政治权力机构的信任。从这个角度来看,处理创伤经历的政策和随后的过渡时期司法似乎主要是马其顿共和国政治统一的问题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信