Implementation of a FFT/IFFT Module on FPGA: Comparison of Methodologies

J. Viejo, A. Millán, M. Bellido, E. Ostúa, P. Ruiz-de-Clavijo, A. Muñoz
{"title":"Implementation of a FFT/IFFT Module on FPGA: Comparison of Methodologies","authors":"J. Viejo, A. Millán, M. Bellido, E. Ostúa, P. Ruiz-de-Clavijo, A. Muñoz","doi":"10.1109/SPL.2008.4547724","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In this work, we have compared three different methodologies for the implementation of a FFT/IFFT module on FPGA: VHDL coding (VC), System-level tools at RT level (STR), and System-level tools at macroblock level (STM). In terms of resource usage and operation frequency, STM has obtained interesting results, although it has an important restriction about internal data width which produces a mean output error of 2.1%. VC and STR become a more general alternative that yields to a lower mean error (1.0%). Thus, we propose to combine VC and STR in order to facilitate the design process as well as allow designers to maintain total control over the module internal architecture and obtain an efficient structure.","PeriodicalId":372678,"journal":{"name":"2008 4th Southern Conference on Programmable Logic","volume":"88 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2008-03-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2008 4th Southern Conference on Programmable Logic","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/SPL.2008.4547724","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

In this work, we have compared three different methodologies for the implementation of a FFT/IFFT module on FPGA: VHDL coding (VC), System-level tools at RT level (STR), and System-level tools at macroblock level (STM). In terms of resource usage and operation frequency, STM has obtained interesting results, although it has an important restriction about internal data width which produces a mean output error of 2.1%. VC and STR become a more general alternative that yields to a lower mean error (1.0%). Thus, we propose to combine VC and STR in order to facilitate the design process as well as allow designers to maintain total control over the module internal architecture and obtain an efficient structure.
FFT/IFFT模块在FPGA上的实现:方法比较
在这项工作中,我们比较了在FPGA上实现FFT/IFFT模块的三种不同方法:VHDL编码(VC)、RT级的系统级工具(STR)和宏块级的系统级工具(STM)。在资源使用和操作频率方面,STM获得了有趣的结果,尽管它对内部数据宽度有一个重要的限制,导致平均输出误差为2.1%。VC和STR成为更普遍的选择,产生更低的平均误差(1.0%)。因此,我们建议将VC和STR结合起来,以方便设计过程,并允许设计师保持对模块内部架构的完全控制,并获得有效的结构。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信