The LER/LWR metrology challenge for advance process control through 3D-AFM and CD-SEM

Lithography Asia Pub Date : 2009-12-03 DOI:10.1117/12.837311
P. Faurie, J. Foucher, A. Foucher
{"title":"The LER/LWR metrology challenge for advance process control through 3D-AFM and CD-SEM","authors":"P. Faurie, J. Foucher, A. Foucher","doi":"10.1117/12.837311","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The continuous shrinkage in dimensions of microelectronic devices has reached such level, with typical gate length in advance R&D of less than 20nm combine with the introduction of new architecture (FinFET, Double gate...) and new materials (porous interconnect material, 193 immersion resist, metal gate material, high k materials...), that new process parameters have to be well understood and well monitored to guarantee sufficient production yield in a near future. Among these parameters, there are the critical dimensions (CD) associated to the sidewall angle (SWA) values, the line edge roughness (LER) and the line width roughness (LWR). Thus, a new metrology challenge has appeared recently and consists in measuring \"accurately\" the fabricated patterns on wafers in addition to measure the patterns on a repeatable way. Therefore, a great effort has to be done on existing techniques like CD-SEM, Scatterometry and 3D-AFM in order to develop them following the two previous criteria: Repeatability and Accuracy. In this paper, we will compare the 3D-AFM and CD-SEM techniques as a mean to measure LER and LWR on silicon and 193 resist and point out CD-SEM impact on the material during measurement. Indeed, depending on the material type, the interaction between the electron beam and the material or between the AFM tip and the material can vary a lot and subsequently can generate measurements bias. The first results tend to show that depending on CD-SEM conditions (magnification, number of acquisition frames) the final outputs can vary on a large range and therefore show that accuracy in such measurements are really not obvious to obtain. On the basis of results obtained on various materials that present standard sidewall roughness, we will show the limit of each technique and will propose different ways to improve them in order to fulfil advance roadmap requirements for the development of the next IC generation.","PeriodicalId":383504,"journal":{"name":"Lithography Asia","volume":"10 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2009-12-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"9","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Lithography Asia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1117/12.837311","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 9

Abstract

The continuous shrinkage in dimensions of microelectronic devices has reached such level, with typical gate length in advance R&D of less than 20nm combine with the introduction of new architecture (FinFET, Double gate...) and new materials (porous interconnect material, 193 immersion resist, metal gate material, high k materials...), that new process parameters have to be well understood and well monitored to guarantee sufficient production yield in a near future. Among these parameters, there are the critical dimensions (CD) associated to the sidewall angle (SWA) values, the line edge roughness (LER) and the line width roughness (LWR). Thus, a new metrology challenge has appeared recently and consists in measuring "accurately" the fabricated patterns on wafers in addition to measure the patterns on a repeatable way. Therefore, a great effort has to be done on existing techniques like CD-SEM, Scatterometry and 3D-AFM in order to develop them following the two previous criteria: Repeatability and Accuracy. In this paper, we will compare the 3D-AFM and CD-SEM techniques as a mean to measure LER and LWR on silicon and 193 resist and point out CD-SEM impact on the material during measurement. Indeed, depending on the material type, the interaction between the electron beam and the material or between the AFM tip and the material can vary a lot and subsequently can generate measurements bias. The first results tend to show that depending on CD-SEM conditions (magnification, number of acquisition frames) the final outputs can vary on a large range and therefore show that accuracy in such measurements are really not obvious to obtain. On the basis of results obtained on various materials that present standard sidewall roughness, we will show the limit of each technique and will propose different ways to improve them in order to fulfil advance roadmap requirements for the development of the next IC generation.
LER/LWR计量对通过3D-AFM和CD-SEM进行超前过程控制的挑战
微电子器件尺寸的不断缩小已经达到了这样的水平,典型的栅极长度在20nm以下,再加上新架构(FinFET,双栅极…)和新材料(多孔互连材料,193抗浸没材料,金属栅极材料,高k材料…)的引入,新的工艺参数必须得到很好的理解和监控,以保证在不久的将来有足够的产量。在这些参数中,有与侧壁角(SWA)值、线边粗糙度(LER)和线宽粗糙度(LWR)相关的临界尺寸(CD)。因此,最近出现了一个新的计量挑战,即除了以可重复的方式测量图案外,还要“准确地”测量晶圆上的制造图案。因此,必须在CD-SEM,散射测量和3D-AFM等现有技术上做出巨大努力,以便按照先前的两个标准:可重复性和准确性来发展它们。在本文中,我们将比较3D-AFM和CD-SEM技术作为测量硅和193抗蚀剂上的LER和LWR的手段,并指出CD-SEM在测量过程中对材料的影响。事实上,根据材料类型的不同,电子束与材料之间或AFM尖端与材料之间的相互作用可能变化很大,随后可能产生测量偏差。第一个结果倾向于表明,根据CD-SEM条件(放大倍数,采集帧数),最终输出可以在很大范围内变化,因此表明这种测量的准确性确实不明显。根据对呈现标准侧壁粗糙度的各种材料获得的结果,我们将展示每种技术的局限性,并将提出不同的改进方法,以满足下一代IC开发的提前路线图要求。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信