Wake Vortex Hazards in En-Route Airspace and Suspected Hazard Area Identification Using High Fidelity Simulation Models

Marc Melgosa, S. Ruiz, J. Busto, M. Steen, Jose I. Rojas, X. Prats
{"title":"Wake Vortex Hazards in En-Route Airspace and Suspected Hazard Area Identification Using High Fidelity Simulation Models","authors":"Marc Melgosa, S. Ruiz, J. Busto, M. Steen, Jose I. Rojas, X. Prats","doi":"10.1109/DASC.2018.8569506","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper presents a discussion about risks and hazards of potential wake vortex encounters in the en-route airspace. High-fidelity simulations under realistic conditions have been analysed showing that the current en-route separation standards may be overconservative in some cases -thus enabling a potential reduction that may lead to additional airspace capacity-, whereas may not protect enough in some specific situations, thus requiring additional protection for flights. The simulation framework developed in the R-WAKE project, a SESAR 2020 Exploratory Research project, has been used to identify and characterise the suspected hazard areas (SHA) that flights should avoid under certain conditions if they are crossing a piece of airspace after another flight. A large number of simulations were performed to generate the SHAs, resulting from the combination of different: a) separation distances; b) aircraft types (including realistic masses and cruise speeds); c) altitudes and atmospheric conditions; and d) relative encounter geometries (horizontal and vertical). This study can support the development of new separation standards aimed at increasing airspace capacity and safety.","PeriodicalId":405724,"journal":{"name":"2018 IEEE/AIAA 37th Digital Avionics Systems Conference (DASC)","volume":"94 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2018 IEEE/AIAA 37th Digital Avionics Systems Conference (DASC)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/DASC.2018.8569506","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

This paper presents a discussion about risks and hazards of potential wake vortex encounters in the en-route airspace. High-fidelity simulations under realistic conditions have been analysed showing that the current en-route separation standards may be overconservative in some cases -thus enabling a potential reduction that may lead to additional airspace capacity-, whereas may not protect enough in some specific situations, thus requiring additional protection for flights. The simulation framework developed in the R-WAKE project, a SESAR 2020 Exploratory Research project, has been used to identify and characterise the suspected hazard areas (SHA) that flights should avoid under certain conditions if they are crossing a piece of airspace after another flight. A large number of simulations were performed to generate the SHAs, resulting from the combination of different: a) separation distances; b) aircraft types (including realistic masses and cruise speeds); c) altitudes and atmospheric conditions; and d) relative encounter geometries (horizontal and vertical). This study can support the development of new separation standards aimed at increasing airspace capacity and safety.
航路空域尾流危害及高保真仿真模型的可疑危险区识别
本文讨论了航路空域潜在尾流遭遇的风险和危害。对现实条件下的高保真度模拟进行了分析,结果表明,目前的航路间隔标准在某些情况下可能过于保守,从而可能导致潜在的减少,从而导致额外的空域容量,而在某些特定情况下可能保护不足,因此需要对飞行进行额外的保护。在SESAR 2020探索性研究项目R-WAKE项目中开发的模拟框架已被用于识别和描述可疑危险区域(SHA),如果飞机在另一次飞行后飞越一片空域,则在某些条件下应该避免这些区域。通过大量的模拟来生成SHAs,这是由不同的分离距离组合而成的:A)分离距离;B)飞机类型(包括实际质量和巡航速度);C)海拔高度和大气条件;d)相对相遇几何(水平和垂直)。这项研究可以支持旨在提高空域容量和安全性的新分离标准的制定。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信