The Classroom Assessment and its Educational Role in ELT

{"title":"The Classroom Assessment and its Educational Role in ELT","authors":"","doi":"10.51424/ishq.33.37","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In this paper, the research conductor sheds lights on the current trends of classroom assessment and the developmental role of scholastic testing in terms of their influential roles in the educational practices. The developmental theories of scholastic learning by researchers in the field of English language teaching and learning yielded effective consequences and practices that relevant to the philosophy of assessment in the agenda of educational attainments. Here, modern theories enhanced the assessment and testing scopes in the institutional domain as a pedagogical instrument to feedback learners and modify the educational outcomes, forwardly which in turn employed to derail the traditional or classical strategy of assessment practices. The assessments process in the educational settings is believed to be considered as a dynamic tool which assisted policymakers for example to modify the old-fashioned practices in the core of educational system, scientifically. In this sense, Tutors’ and tutees’ views are important to attaining progressive evaluation of language teaching programs. The researchers in the field of ELT have constructed criteria for instance to testing a good test so as to develop and strengthen the assessment agenda as well as to explore language learners’ performance in use. It is knowledgeable that the scientific analysis of assessment practices in the educational system turned to be highly complex and gained a systematic base to assure accuracy, accountability and fairness in measurement domain, for example. In general, the process of scholastic assessment can provide both of language instructors and test-takers with plethora and myriad of information concerning the academic attainments for learning students’ purposes. The new academic approaches of pedagogical assessment and language testing domain enabled policymakers or pedagogues in diagnosing ill-achievements and understand students’ learning needs. In return, formative assessment for example aided language teachers to feedback learners positively in order to monitor the growth of students’ skills and the rate of performance achievements. As a result, all stakeholders are involved as active participants to accomplishing the educational objectives. Key words: classroom assessment, language assessor, test-taker, scholastic- assessment, tutor and tutee.","PeriodicalId":348768,"journal":{"name":"Journal Ishraqat Tanmawya","volume":"16 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal Ishraqat Tanmawya","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.51424/ishq.33.37","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In this paper, the research conductor sheds lights on the current trends of classroom assessment and the developmental role of scholastic testing in terms of their influential roles in the educational practices. The developmental theories of scholastic learning by researchers in the field of English language teaching and learning yielded effective consequences and practices that relevant to the philosophy of assessment in the agenda of educational attainments. Here, modern theories enhanced the assessment and testing scopes in the institutional domain as a pedagogical instrument to feedback learners and modify the educational outcomes, forwardly which in turn employed to derail the traditional or classical strategy of assessment practices. The assessments process in the educational settings is believed to be considered as a dynamic tool which assisted policymakers for example to modify the old-fashioned practices in the core of educational system, scientifically. In this sense, Tutors’ and tutees’ views are important to attaining progressive evaluation of language teaching programs. The researchers in the field of ELT have constructed criteria for instance to testing a good test so as to develop and strengthen the assessment agenda as well as to explore language learners’ performance in use. It is knowledgeable that the scientific analysis of assessment practices in the educational system turned to be highly complex and gained a systematic base to assure accuracy, accountability and fairness in measurement domain, for example. In general, the process of scholastic assessment can provide both of language instructors and test-takers with plethora and myriad of information concerning the academic attainments for learning students’ purposes. The new academic approaches of pedagogical assessment and language testing domain enabled policymakers or pedagogues in diagnosing ill-achievements and understand students’ learning needs. In return, formative assessment for example aided language teachers to feedback learners positively in order to monitor the growth of students’ skills and the rate of performance achievements. As a result, all stakeholders are involved as active participants to accomplishing the educational objectives. Key words: classroom assessment, language assessor, test-taker, scholastic- assessment, tutor and tutee.
课堂评价及其在英语教学中的教育作用
本文从课堂评价的发展趋势和学业测试对教育实践的影响两方面阐述了学业测试的发展作用。由英语教学领域的研究人员提出的学术学习发展理论产生了与教育成就议程中的评估哲学相关的有效结果和实践。在这里,现代理论加强了机构领域的评估和测试范围,作为反馈学习者和修改教育成果的教学工具,这反过来又被用来破坏传统或经典的评估实践策略。教育环境中的评估过程被认为是一种动态的工具,例如,它有助于决策者科学地修改教育系统核心中的老式做法。从这个意义上说,导师和学生的观点对于实现语言教学项目的渐进式评估至关重要。英语教学领域的研究者已经构建了标准,例如测试一个好的测试,以发展和加强评估议程,以及探索语言学习者的使用表现。众所周知,对教育系统中评估做法的科学分析变得非常复杂,并获得了系统的基础,以确保例如在衡量领域的准确性、责任性和公平性。一般来说,学术评估的过程可以为语言教师和考生提供大量的关于学习目的的学术成就的信息。教学评估和语言测试领域的新学术方法使政策制定者或教师能够诊断成绩不良并了解学生的学习需求。作为回报,形成性评估例如帮助语言教师积极反馈学习者,以监测学生技能的增长和绩效成就的比率。因此,所有利益相关者都作为积极的参与者参与其中,以实现教育目标。关键词:课堂评估,语言评估者,考生,学业评估,导师和受教育者。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信