Performance evaluation of single and multiple-Gaussian models for skin color modeling

T. Caetano, S. Olabarriaga, D. Barone
{"title":"Performance evaluation of single and multiple-Gaussian models for skin color modeling","authors":"T. Caetano, S. Olabarriaga, D. Barone","doi":"10.1109/SIBGRA.2002.1167155","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"We present an experimental setup to evaluate the relative performance of single Gaussian models and Gaussian mixture models for skin color modeling. Firstly, a sample set of 1,120,000 skin pixels from a number of ethnic groups is selected and represented in the chromaticity space. Parameter estimation for both the single Gaussian and seven (with 2 to 8 Gaussian components) Gaussian mixture models is performed. For the mixture models, learning is carried out via the expectation-maximisation (EM) algorithm. In order to compare performances achieved by the 8 different models, we apply to each model a test set of 800 images - none from the training set. True skin regions, representing ground truth, are manually selected, and false positive and true positive rates are computed for each value of a specific threshold. Finally, receiver operating characteristics (ROC) curves are plotted for each model, making it possible to analyze and compare their relative performances. Results obtained show that, for medium to high true positive rates, mixture models (with 2 to 8 components) outperform the single Gaussian model. Nevertheless, for low false positive rates, all the models behave similarly.","PeriodicalId":286814,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings. XV Brazilian Symposium on Computer Graphics and Image Processing","volume":"60 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2002-10-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"48","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings. XV Brazilian Symposium on Computer Graphics and Image Processing","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/SIBGRA.2002.1167155","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 48

Abstract

We present an experimental setup to evaluate the relative performance of single Gaussian models and Gaussian mixture models for skin color modeling. Firstly, a sample set of 1,120,000 skin pixels from a number of ethnic groups is selected and represented in the chromaticity space. Parameter estimation for both the single Gaussian and seven (with 2 to 8 Gaussian components) Gaussian mixture models is performed. For the mixture models, learning is carried out via the expectation-maximisation (EM) algorithm. In order to compare performances achieved by the 8 different models, we apply to each model a test set of 800 images - none from the training set. True skin regions, representing ground truth, are manually selected, and false positive and true positive rates are computed for each value of a specific threshold. Finally, receiver operating characteristics (ROC) curves are plotted for each model, making it possible to analyze and compare their relative performances. Results obtained show that, for medium to high true positive rates, mixture models (with 2 to 8 components) outperform the single Gaussian model. Nevertheless, for low false positive rates, all the models behave similarly.
肤色建模中单高斯和多高斯模型的性能评价
我们提出了一个实验装置来评估单一高斯模型和高斯混合模型在肤色建模中的相对性能。首先,从多个种族中选择112万个皮肤像素的样本集,并在色度空间中表示。对单高斯和七个(2到8个高斯分量)高斯混合模型进行了参数估计。对于混合模型,通过期望最大化(EM)算法进行学习。为了比较8个不同模型的性能,我们对每个模型应用了一个包含800个图像的测试集——没有一个来自训练集。代表真实的皮肤区域是手动选择的,并为特定阈值的每个值计算假阳性率和真阳性率。最后,绘制每个模型的受试者工作特征(ROC)曲线,以便分析和比较它们的相对性能。结果表明,对于中等到较高的真阳性率,混合模型(2到8个成分)优于单一高斯模型。然而,对于低假阳性率,所有模型的行为相似。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信