CHANGE IN TERRITORIAL JURISDICTION OF A CRIMINAL CASE ACCORDING TO THE PRINCIPLE OF JUDICIAL INDEPENDENCE AND ADVERSARIAL PRINCIPLE OF PARTIES

А. А. Зимасова, Е. В. Ежова
{"title":"CHANGE IN TERRITORIAL JURISDICTION OF A CRIMINAL CASE ACCORDING TO THE PRINCIPLE OF JUDICIAL INDEPENDENCE AND ADVERSARIAL PRINCIPLE OF PARTIES","authors":"А. А. Зимасова, Е. В. Ежова","doi":"10.35266/2312-3419-2023-2-91-98","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The study considers the practice of applying Article 35, Paragraph 1, Item 2, Sub-item “c” of the Criminal Procedural Code of the Russian Federation. The Article reads on the prosecutor’s assumptions of circumstances that may cast discredit on the court. While this regulatory provision was in force, the courts delivered many judgments on behalf of the prosecutor to change the erritorial jurisdiction of a criminal case without any convincing evidence. All of which complicates the work of defense and the conditions for an accused (defendant), who is transferred to another region and faces an extended period of detention. In addition, the article considers the сonstitutional principle of considering a lawsuit in the court of its legal jurisdiction. The authors use as examples resonant and equivocal cases, which substantiate the relevance and urgency of the issue.","PeriodicalId":125920,"journal":{"name":"Surgut State University Journal","volume":"31 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Surgut State University Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.35266/2312-3419-2023-2-91-98","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The study considers the practice of applying Article 35, Paragraph 1, Item 2, Sub-item “c” of the Criminal Procedural Code of the Russian Federation. The Article reads on the prosecutor’s assumptions of circumstances that may cast discredit on the court. While this regulatory provision was in force, the courts delivered many judgments on behalf of the prosecutor to change the erritorial jurisdiction of a criminal case without any convincing evidence. All of which complicates the work of defense and the conditions for an accused (defendant), who is transferred to another region and faces an extended period of detention. In addition, the article considers the сonstitutional principle of considering a lawsuit in the court of its legal jurisdiction. The authors use as examples resonant and equivocal cases, which substantiate the relevance and urgency of the issue.
根据司法独立原则和当事人对抗原则变更刑事案件地域管辖
本研究报告审议了适用《俄罗斯联邦刑事诉讼法》第35条第1款第2项“c”分项的做法。该条规定了检察官对可能使法院名誉扫地的情况的假设。虽然这一管制规定是有效的,但法院在没有任何令人信服的证据的情况下,代表检察官作出了许多判决,以改变刑事案件的领土管辖权。所有这些都使辩护工作和被告(被告)的条件复杂化,被告被转移到另一个地区并面临长期拘留。此外,本文还探讨了在其法定管辖的法院审理诉讼的宪法原则。作者使用的例子共鸣和模棱两可的情况下,证实了问题的相关性和紧迫性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信