Incremental CTL model checking using BDD subsetting

Abelardo Pardo, G. Hachtel
{"title":"Incremental CTL model checking using BDD subsetting","authors":"Abelardo Pardo, G. Hachtel","doi":"10.1145/277044.277171","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"An automatic abstraction/refinement algorithm for symbolic CTL model checking is presented. Conservative model checking is thus done for the full CTL language-no restriction is made to the universal or existential fragments. The algorithm begins with conservative verification of an initial abstraction. If the conclusion is negative, it derives a \"goal set\" of states which require further resolution. It then successively refines, with respect to this goal set, the approximations made in the sub-formulas, until the given formula is verified or computational resources are exhausted. This method applies uniformly to the abstractions based in over-approximation as well as under-approximations of the model. Both the refinement and the abstraction procedures are based in BDD-subsetting. Note that refinement procedures which are based on error traces, are limited to over-approximation on the universal fragment (or for language containment), whereas the goal set method is applicable to all consistent approximations, and for all CTL formulas.","PeriodicalId":221221,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings 1998 Design and Automation Conference. 35th DAC. (Cat. No.98CH36175)","volume":"9 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1998-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"47","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings 1998 Design and Automation Conference. 35th DAC. (Cat. No.98CH36175)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/277044.277171","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 47

Abstract

An automatic abstraction/refinement algorithm for symbolic CTL model checking is presented. Conservative model checking is thus done for the full CTL language-no restriction is made to the universal or existential fragments. The algorithm begins with conservative verification of an initial abstraction. If the conclusion is negative, it derives a "goal set" of states which require further resolution. It then successively refines, with respect to this goal set, the approximations made in the sub-formulas, until the given formula is verified or computational resources are exhausted. This method applies uniformly to the abstractions based in over-approximation as well as under-approximations of the model. Both the refinement and the abstraction procedures are based in BDD-subsetting. Note that refinement procedures which are based on error traces, are limited to over-approximation on the universal fragment (or for language containment), whereas the goal set method is applicable to all consistent approximations, and for all CTL formulas.
基于BDD子集的增量CTL模型检验
提出了一种用于符号CTL模型检测的自动抽象/改进算法。因此,对完整的CTL语言进行了保守的模型检查——对通用或存在片段没有任何限制。该算法首先对初始抽象进行保守验证。如果结论是否定的,它会导出一个需要进一步解决的国家“目标集”。然后,对于这个目标集,它依次细化子公式中的近似,直到给定公式得到验证或计算资源耗尽。该方法统一适用于模型的过近似和欠近似的抽象。精化和抽象过程都基于bdd -子集。请注意,基于错误跟踪的改进程序仅限于对通用片段(或语言包含)的过度逼近,而目标集方法适用于所有一致逼近和所有CTL公式。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信