Decolonizing Coptic (Music) Studies

Carolyn M. Ramzy
{"title":"Decolonizing Coptic (Music) Studies","authors":"Carolyn M. Ramzy","doi":"10.5913/jcscs.13.2021.a003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In this discussion, I consider the rising ambivalences of situating Coptic (music) studies within their lived encounters of Western colonialism and continued Western cultural imperialism. In many ways, Coptic (music) studies is the direct result of Coptic colonial encounters, as Western scholars first categorized, transcribed, and studied Coptic music and Copts as colonial subjects. In turn, Copts too have strategized their subaltern status as a beleaguered religious minority in Egypt to cultivate a critical indigeneity movement that continues today. Here, I argue that to dismiss Coptic ongoing experiences of coloniality, both in Egypt and in Copts’ new North American homelands, exacerbates the gendered and classed exclusions of non-canonical voices in Coptic music’s lived experiences, in this case, women’s voices. Only by situating Coptic scholarship, histories, and music culture within these larger contexts can we begin to reckon with how European powers, extractive scholarly wealth, and Eurocentric imperial structures continue to shape the ways in which we engage with Coptic Christianity, either as pious believers, clerics who administer the Church’s most Holy rites, or as scholars both within and outside of the community. In the end, we may even work towards decolonizing ourselves and learn how to be active allies and advocates for others who, like us, share an ongoing and dialectical history with coloniality and cultural sovereignty.","PeriodicalId":215998,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the Canadian Society for Coptic Studies","volume":"38 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-02-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the Canadian Society for Coptic Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5913/jcscs.13.2021.a003","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In this discussion, I consider the rising ambivalences of situating Coptic (music) studies within their lived encounters of Western colonialism and continued Western cultural imperialism. In many ways, Coptic (music) studies is the direct result of Coptic colonial encounters, as Western scholars first categorized, transcribed, and studied Coptic music and Copts as colonial subjects. In turn, Copts too have strategized their subaltern status as a beleaguered religious minority in Egypt to cultivate a critical indigeneity movement that continues today. Here, I argue that to dismiss Coptic ongoing experiences of coloniality, both in Egypt and in Copts’ new North American homelands, exacerbates the gendered and classed exclusions of non-canonical voices in Coptic music’s lived experiences, in this case, women’s voices. Only by situating Coptic scholarship, histories, and music culture within these larger contexts can we begin to reckon with how European powers, extractive scholarly wealth, and Eurocentric imperial structures continue to shape the ways in which we engage with Coptic Christianity, either as pious believers, clerics who administer the Church’s most Holy rites, or as scholars both within and outside of the community. In the end, we may even work towards decolonizing ourselves and learn how to be active allies and advocates for others who, like us, share an ongoing and dialectical history with coloniality and cultural sovereignty.
非殖民化科普特(音乐)研究
在这次讨论中,我考虑了科普特(音乐)研究在他们与西方殖民主义和持续的西方文化帝国主义的生活遭遇中不断上升的矛盾心理。在许多方面,科普特(音乐)研究是科普特殖民地遭遇的直接结果,因为西方学者首先将科普特音乐和科普特人归类,转录和研究为殖民地主题。反过来,科普特人也把自己作为埃及受困的宗教少数群体的次等地位作为策略,培养了一场关键的本土运动,一直持续到今天。在这里,我认为忽视科普特人持续的殖民经历,无论是在埃及还是在科普特人新的北美家园,加剧了科普特音乐生活经历中非规范声音的性别和阶级排斥,在这种情况下,女性的声音。只有将科普特学术、历史和音乐文化置于这些更大的背景中,我们才能开始考虑欧洲大国、榨取的学术财富和以欧洲为中心的帝国结构如何继续塑造我们与科普特基督教的交往方式,无论是作为虔诚的信徒、管理教会最神圣仪式的神职人员,还是作为社区内外的学者。最后,我们甚至可以努力实现自己的非殖民化,并学习如何成为其他国家的积极盟友和倡导者,这些国家和我们一样,与殖民主义和文化主权有着持续和辩证的历史。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信