Use of a Bicycle Ergometer for Limb Position Sense Testing During a Cyclic Lower Limb Task

D. Brown, Holly Katchuk
{"title":"Use of a Bicycle Ergometer for Limb Position Sense Testing During a Cyclic Lower Limb Task","authors":"D. Brown, Holly Katchuk","doi":"10.1097/01253086-200327020-00005","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"&NA; Patients with neurologic impairments are tested for proprioceptive deficits using static or quasi‐static techniques that are not applied within the context of a functional movement task. This study was conducted to determine if limb position sense (LPS) testing can be reliably measured during a dynamic cyclic task (eg, pedaling) and whether the accuracy of LPS will be affected by movement and is phasedependent. Experiments were performed with 16 young adult subjects. Subjects pedaled a bicycle ergometer while attempting to identify when their foot traveled through a specified target region. Errors were measured when they incorrectly identified that their foot was in a region outside of the target. Subjects were tested in active versus passive versus static modes, eyes‐open versus eyes‐closed, and at each of 7 target regions. The LPS test showed high reliability [ICC (1,1) ranged from 0.86 to 0.98]. Passive movement resulted in the least errors. During active movement, transition regions had the least errors and the mid‐downstroke region had the most errors. Therefore LPS, tested during pedaling, was reliable and revealed movement and phasedependent position sense.","PeriodicalId":345729,"journal":{"name":"Neurology Report","volume":"28 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Neurology Report","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/01253086-200327020-00005","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

&NA; Patients with neurologic impairments are tested for proprioceptive deficits using static or quasi‐static techniques that are not applied within the context of a functional movement task. This study was conducted to determine if limb position sense (LPS) testing can be reliably measured during a dynamic cyclic task (eg, pedaling) and whether the accuracy of LPS will be affected by movement and is phasedependent. Experiments were performed with 16 young adult subjects. Subjects pedaled a bicycle ergometer while attempting to identify when their foot traveled through a specified target region. Errors were measured when they incorrectly identified that their foot was in a region outside of the target. Subjects were tested in active versus passive versus static modes, eyes‐open versus eyes‐closed, and at each of 7 target regions. The LPS test showed high reliability [ICC (1,1) ranged from 0.86 to 0.98]. Passive movement resulted in the least errors. During active movement, transition regions had the least errors and the mid‐downstroke region had the most errors. Therefore LPS, tested during pedaling, was reliable and revealed movement and phasedependent position sense.
在循环下肢任务中使用自行车测力计进行肢体位置感测试
患者;神经损伤患者使用静态或准静态技术测试本体感觉缺陷,这些技术不应用于功能性运动任务。本研究旨在确定肢体位置感(LPS)测试是否可以在动态循环任务(如蹬车)中可靠地测量,以及LPS的准确性是否会受到运动的影响,是否与相位相关。实验对象为16名青年成人。受试者踩着自行车测力器,试图确定他们的脚何时经过指定的目标区域。当他们错误地识别出他们的脚在目标之外的区域时,就会测量误差。受试者分别在主动、被动和静态模式下,睁眼和闭眼模式下,在7个目标区域进行测试。LPS检验具有较高的信度[ICC(1,1)范围为0.86 ~ 0.98]。被动运动导致的误差最小。在主动运动中,过渡区误差最小,中下冲程区误差最大。因此,在踩踏过程中测试的LPS是可靠的,并揭示了运动和相位依赖的位置感。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信