Kritik Atas Peraturan Wali Nikah Dalam KHI dan Fikih Perspektif Gender

Mughni Labib Ilhamuddin Is Ashidiqie
{"title":"Kritik Atas Peraturan Wali Nikah Dalam KHI dan Fikih Perspektif Gender","authors":"Mughni Labib Ilhamuddin Is Ashidiqie","doi":"10.14421/al-mazaahib.v9i1.2304","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The guardian is one of the pillars that must be fulfilled in marriage contract. In its practice, it is deemed necessary for reconstruction due to the provisions of marriage guardian stipulated in Article 20 Paragraph (1) in Islamic Law Compilation reflect provisions that are gender biased and irrelevant to conventions ratified by the Indonesia government, because only men’s right to be marriage guardian. This article is intended to critically examine the provisions of the guardian of marriage of the Compilation of Islamic Law. This article is a literature study using descriptive-analytical research methods. The subject of this research is women's rights in the concept of marriage guardian. The approach used in the effort to critique and reconstruct women's rights as marriage guardians is the principle of gender justice. This article considers that reconstructing the idea concerning one’s right to become a marriage guardian is not something that is impossible to do. This is because the point by which only men have the right to become marriage guardian was stated by scholars, Syafi'i mazhab, was determined based on the socio-cultural conditions of the community. Back then, women were considered as lesser than men in many terms, and this was of course different from the condition of women today. That is, the parameter in determining the right of a person to be a marriage guardian is the ability to act perfectly. If so, then adult women today can become marriage guardian, as they are currently able to act perfectly (kāmil al-Ahliyyah).","PeriodicalId":375931,"journal":{"name":"Al-Mazaahib: Jurnal Perbandingan Hukum","volume":"6 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-09-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Al-Mazaahib: Jurnal Perbandingan Hukum","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14421/al-mazaahib.v9i1.2304","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The guardian is one of the pillars that must be fulfilled in marriage contract. In its practice, it is deemed necessary for reconstruction due to the provisions of marriage guardian stipulated in Article 20 Paragraph (1) in Islamic Law Compilation reflect provisions that are gender biased and irrelevant to conventions ratified by the Indonesia government, because only men’s right to be marriage guardian. This article is intended to critically examine the provisions of the guardian of marriage of the Compilation of Islamic Law. This article is a literature study using descriptive-analytical research methods. The subject of this research is women's rights in the concept of marriage guardian. The approach used in the effort to critique and reconstruct women's rights as marriage guardians is the principle of gender justice. This article considers that reconstructing the idea concerning one’s right to become a marriage guardian is not something that is impossible to do. This is because the point by which only men have the right to become marriage guardian was stated by scholars, Syafi'i mazhab, was determined based on the socio-cultural conditions of the community. Back then, women were considered as lesser than men in many terms, and this was of course different from the condition of women today. That is, the parameter in determining the right of a person to be a marriage guardian is the ability to act perfectly. If so, then adult women today can become marriage guardian, as they are currently able to act perfectly (kāmil al-Ahliyyah).
对KHI和性别视角方面的婚姻法的批评
监护人是婚姻契约中必须履行的支柱之一。在实践中,由于《伊斯兰教法汇编》第20条第(1)款中关于婚姻监护人的规定体现了性别偏见,与印尼政府批准的公约无关,只有男性有权成为婚姻监护人,因此认为有必要进行重建。本文旨在批判性地考察《伊斯兰教法汇编》中关于婚姻监护人的规定。本文采用描述性分析研究方法进行文献研究。本研究的主题是女性在婚姻监护观念中的权利。在批判和重构妇女作为婚姻监护人的权利时,所采用的方法是性别正义原则。本文认为,重构婚姻监护人的权利观念并非不可能。这是因为学者Syafi'i mazhab指出,只有男性才有权成为婚姻监护人,这一点是根据社区的社会文化条件确定的。那时候,女性在很多方面都被认为不如男性,这当然与今天女性的状况不同。也就是说,决定一个人作为婚姻监护人的权利的参数是行为完美的能力。如果是这样,那么今天的成年女性可以成为婚姻监护人,因为她们目前能够完美地行事(kāmil al-Ahliyyah)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信