Middle School Students' Critical Thinking Skills in Science Learning

Rori Khoirudin, Ashad, Moh. Masykuri
{"title":"Middle School Students' Critical Thinking Skills in Science Learning","authors":"Rori Khoirudin, Ashad, Moh. Masykuri","doi":"10.30738/jipg.vol3.no2.a12716","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This research is a qualitative descriptive research with the aim to describe students' ability in construct critical thinking. The subjects of the study were the students of SMP Negeri 8 Surakarta city for the academic year 2019/2020 which amounted to 762 students, with a sample size of 200 students . Population choose random sample of each class. Instrument used consisted of test the critical thinking skills of students through a questionnaire with 20 statements questionnaire number . The questionnaire sheet was developed based on 6 indicators that were the focus of the study. The indicator in question is a discussion that is able to ask questions, answer questions, solve problems, make conclusions, question and assess the results of observations . The results showed that if seen from the average level of student achievement on each indicator, the average achievement on the indicator analyzing argument is 72,28%, on the indicator of asking ability is 78,55%, on the indicator answering questions is 78,35%, on the indicator of solving the problem is 61,95%, the indicator makes a conclusion is 55,45%, and the indicator of the skill of evaluating and evaluating the results of observations is 72.50%. The results also showed that in general students of SMP Negeri 8 Surakarta had critical thinking skills with quite critical criteria, with 8 students classified as very non critical (4%), who were classified as non-critical were 47 students (23,5%), who were classified as as quite critical were 133 students (66,5%), who were classified as critical were 10 students (5%), and those classified as very critical were 2 students (1%). This proves that students' critical thinking skills still need to be trained further in order to be improved.","PeriodicalId":104916,"journal":{"name":"Jurnal Ilmiah Profesi Guru","volume":"32 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-08-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Jurnal Ilmiah Profesi Guru","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.30738/jipg.vol3.no2.a12716","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This research is a qualitative descriptive research with the aim to describe students' ability in construct critical thinking. The subjects of the study were the students of SMP Negeri 8 Surakarta city for the academic year 2019/2020 which amounted to 762 students, with a sample size of 200 students . Population choose random sample of each class. Instrument used consisted of test the critical thinking skills of students through a questionnaire with 20 statements questionnaire number . The questionnaire sheet was developed based on 6 indicators that were the focus of the study. The indicator in question is a discussion that is able to ask questions, answer questions, solve problems, make conclusions, question and assess the results of observations . The results showed that if seen from the average level of student achievement on each indicator, the average achievement on the indicator analyzing argument is 72,28%, on the indicator of asking ability is 78,55%, on the indicator answering questions is 78,35%, on the indicator of solving the problem is 61,95%, the indicator makes a conclusion is 55,45%, and the indicator of the skill of evaluating and evaluating the results of observations is 72.50%. The results also showed that in general students of SMP Negeri 8 Surakarta had critical thinking skills with quite critical criteria, with 8 students classified as very non critical (4%), who were classified as non-critical were 47 students (23,5%), who were classified as as quite critical were 133 students (66,5%), who were classified as critical were 10 students (5%), and those classified as very critical were 2 students (1%). This proves that students' critical thinking skills still need to be trained further in order to be improved.
中学生科学学习中的批判性思维能力
本研究是一项定性描述性研究,旨在描述学生建构批判性思维的能力。本研究的对象是2019/2020学年Surakarta市SMP Negeri 8的学生,共762名学生,样本量为200名学生。人口选择每个类别的随机样本。所使用的工具包括通过一份包含20个题目的问卷来测试学生的批判性思维能力。调查表是根据研究重点的6个指标编制的。所讨论的指标是能够提出问题、回答问题、解决问题、得出结论、质疑和评估观察结果的讨论。结果表明,从学生各指标的平均成绩来看,分析论证指标的平均成绩为72.28%,提问能力指标的平均成绩为78.55%,回答问题指标的平均成绩为78.35%,解决问题指标的平均成绩为61.95%,得出结论指标的平均成绩为55.45%,评价和评价观察结果的技能指标的平均成绩为72.50%。结果还显示,总体而言,SMP Negeri 8 Surakarta学生的批判性思维能力具有相当批判性的标准,其中8名学生被划分为非常不批判性(4%),47名学生被划分为非批判性(23.5%),133名学生被划分为相当批判性(66.5%),10名学生被划分为批判性(5%),2名学生被划分为非常批判性(1%)。这证明学生的批判性思维能力还需要进一步的训练才能得到提高。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信