Covertly Concealed 'Jumper' Managers’ Ignorance, Distrust, and Amoral Careerist Mismanagement

Reuven Shapira
{"title":"Covertly Concealed 'Jumper' Managers’ Ignorance, Distrust, and Amoral Careerist Mismanagement","authors":"Reuven Shapira","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.2907581","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The explanation of organizational distrust missed covertly concealed managerial ignorance (hereafter: CCMI), a dark secret veiled on organizations’ dark side and facilitated by managers’ unknowing of their own ignorance and by unstudied “jumper” managers’ coping with gaps in local tacit know-how and phronesis (Greek for practical wisdom). Employees may trust “jumpers” coming from the outside who risk their own authority, expose their ignorance, learn, fill the gaps, and become competent, but managerial power enables defense of authority by using CCMI and camouflaging resulting mistakes and failures by bluffs, power abuses, scapegoating, and other subterfuges aimed at amoral careerism (AC). Anthropologists untangled subterfuges, but without becoming managers they missed how such defensiveness caused mutual distrust, curbed knowledge-sharing, learning, and problem-solving, furthering mistakes and failures in vicious distrust and ignorance cycles. A longitudinal study of five automatic processing plants by a management-educated and experienced semi-native anthropologist untangled that only few of their “jumper” executives, 7 of 32 studied, chose ignorance-exposing vulnerable involvement and became job-competent. As the import of “jumper” executives is now common, this problem is worsening and calls for solutions that are, suggested besides recommendations for further study.","PeriodicalId":215232,"journal":{"name":"ERN: Other Organizations & Markets: Motivation & Incentives (Topic)","volume":"301 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ERN: Other Organizations & Markets: Motivation & Incentives (Topic)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2907581","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The explanation of organizational distrust missed covertly concealed managerial ignorance (hereafter: CCMI), a dark secret veiled on organizations’ dark side and facilitated by managers’ unknowing of their own ignorance and by unstudied “jumper” managers’ coping with gaps in local tacit know-how and phronesis (Greek for practical wisdom). Employees may trust “jumpers” coming from the outside who risk their own authority, expose their ignorance, learn, fill the gaps, and become competent, but managerial power enables defense of authority by using CCMI and camouflaging resulting mistakes and failures by bluffs, power abuses, scapegoating, and other subterfuges aimed at amoral careerism (AC). Anthropologists untangled subterfuges, but without becoming managers they missed how such defensiveness caused mutual distrust, curbed knowledge-sharing, learning, and problem-solving, furthering mistakes and failures in vicious distrust and ignorance cycles. A longitudinal study of five automatic processing plants by a management-educated and experienced semi-native anthropologist untangled that only few of their “jumper” executives, 7 of 32 studied, chose ignorance-exposing vulnerable involvement and became job-competent. As the import of “jumper” executives is now common, this problem is worsening and calls for solutions that are, suggested besides recommendations for further study.
暗地里隐藏的“跳楼经理”的无知、不信任和不道德的野心家管理不善
对组织不信任的解释忽略了隐蔽的管理无知(以下简称:CCMI),这是一个隐藏在组织黑暗面上的黑暗秘密,由于管理者不知道自己的无知,以及未经研究的“跳线”管理者应对当地隐性知识和实践智慧(希腊语为实践智慧)的差距,助长了这一秘密。员工可能会信任来自外部的“跳槽者”,这些人冒着失去自己权威的风险,暴露自己的无知,学习,填补空白,并变得称职,但管理权力可以通过使用CCMI来捍卫权威,并通过虚张声势、滥用权力、找替罪羊和其他旨在不道德的职业主义(AC)的诡计来掩饰由此产生的错误和失败。人类学家解开了诡计,但没有成为管理者,他们忽略了这种防御如何导致相互不信任,抑制知识共享、学习和解决问题,在恶性不信任和无知循环中加剧错误和失败。一位受过管理教育、经验丰富的半本土人类学家对五家自动加工厂进行了纵向研究,结果表明,在32名被研究的高管中,只有少数人(7人)选择了暴露于无知的弱势参与,并成为胜任工作的人。由于“跨界”高管的引进现在很普遍,这一问题正在恶化,除了提出进一步研究的建议外,还需要提出解决方案。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信