An Investigation of Teacher Perspectives on Emergency Remote Teaching Implemented in Science and Art Centers during the COVID-19 Pandemic

Halil Bolat, Fazilet Karakus
{"title":"An Investigation of Teacher Perspectives on Emergency Remote Teaching Implemented in Science and Art Centers during the COVID-19 Pandemic","authors":"Halil Bolat, Fazilet Karakus","doi":"10.32865/fire202273297","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The purpose of this study was to determine teacher perspectives on emergency remote teaching conducted during the COVID-19 pandemic in science and art centers. The study was carried out using a phenomenological qualitative research design with 41 science and art center teachers from 17 different majors. A content analysis method was employed in this study that used a criterion sampling method and collected data through a semi-structured interview form. The study found that most teachers have not received any training on distance education, technique-based teaching cannot be employed in remote teaching processes, the planned activities remain unfinished, student-student and student-teacher interactions decrease, teachers mostly conduct emergency remote teaching online, and teachers improved themselves in technological equipment and the knowledge of teaching profession together with emergency remote teaching. It was also found that student participation is low and teachers find face-to-face education more effective than emergency remote teaching, experience problems in feedback and revision, cannot perform observation-based measurement and evaluation, and emergency remote teaching increases the workload. Teachers expected that the distance education could be carried out on a part-time basis after the pandemic and that they receive in-service education regarding distance education.","PeriodicalId":232875,"journal":{"name":"FIRE: Forum for International Research in Education","volume":"77 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-02-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"FIRE: Forum for International Research in Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.32865/fire202273297","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to determine teacher perspectives on emergency remote teaching conducted during the COVID-19 pandemic in science and art centers. The study was carried out using a phenomenological qualitative research design with 41 science and art center teachers from 17 different majors. A content analysis method was employed in this study that used a criterion sampling method and collected data through a semi-structured interview form. The study found that most teachers have not received any training on distance education, technique-based teaching cannot be employed in remote teaching processes, the planned activities remain unfinished, student-student and student-teacher interactions decrease, teachers mostly conduct emergency remote teaching online, and teachers improved themselves in technological equipment and the knowledge of teaching profession together with emergency remote teaching. It was also found that student participation is low and teachers find face-to-face education more effective than emergency remote teaching, experience problems in feedback and revision, cannot perform observation-based measurement and evaluation, and emergency remote teaching increases the workload. Teachers expected that the distance education could be carried out on a part-time basis after the pandemic and that they receive in-service education regarding distance education.
新冠肺炎疫情期间文理中心实施应急远程教学的教师观点调查
本研究的目的是确定教师对2019冠状病毒病大流行期间在科学和艺术中心进行的紧急远程教学的看法。本研究采用现象学质性研究设计,对来自17个不同专业的41名文理中心教师进行调查。本研究采用内容分析法,采用标准抽样法,采用半结构化访谈形式收集数据。研究发现,大部分教师没有接受过远程教育的培训,远程教学过程中无法采用技术型教学,计划活动未完成,学生与学生、学生与教师的互动减少,教师多是在线进行应急远程教学,教师在应急远程教学的同时提高了技术装备和教学专业知识。学生参与率低,教师认为面对面教学比应急远程教学更有效,在反馈和修订方面存在问题,不能进行基于观察的测量和评价,应急远程教学增加了工作量。教师期望在大流行后可以在非全时的基础上开展远程教育,并希望他们接受有关远程教育的在职教育。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信