CINEMATIC DISCOURSE OF HISTORY IN THE CAMERA GLASS OF A HISTORIAN

Lyubov M. Arkhipova
{"title":"CINEMATIC DISCOURSE OF HISTORY IN THE CAMERA GLASS OF A HISTORIAN","authors":"Lyubov M. Arkhipova","doi":"10.47026/2712-9454-2023-4-2-51-61","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The article is devoted to the interdisciplinary problem of using cinematic interpretations of the historical past in the professional activity of a historian, including its research and educational tasks. \n \nThe purpose of the study is to create opportunities for a scientifically based definition of a historian’s professional “niche” when he turns to the cinematic discourse of the historical past. \n \nMaterials and methods. To determine the methodological foundations of selected cognitive models, the principles of neo-positivism, narrative philosophy, methods of discursive analysis of texts, including such features of the language of cinema as imagery and pronounced symbolism, as well as the provisions of phenomenological epistemology, were used. In their unity, these cognitive theories of culture allowed the author of the article to present a verified version of the results obtained by analyzing interpretations of the creative intent of film directors found in the scientific literature. \n \nStudy results. In the first part of the article, the main debatable aspects of the problem are considered in line with modern scientific trends, convincing of the relevance of the research undertaken. In its second part, the analysis of existing research practices in this field of knowledge is presented, the algorithms for reading historical information in feature films characteristic of each variant are identified and disclosed. \n \nConclusions. The final part of the article contains as results the definition for each of the identified research models, conventionally called “descriptive-informational”, “imagological”, “source studies” and “memorial”. The classification is based on the criterion of goal-setting and the scientific apparatus associated with it – the methodological approach, methods, the object and the subject of research. The author of the article gives assessment of their importance in the interdisciplinary paradigm of scientific historical creativity, thereby determining possible prospects for the development of historians’ research practice in the field of cognition of the past based on cinematography works. It seems obvious that the practical significance of observations proposed by the article’s author about the possibilities of solving the problem posed by not only active, but also critically meaningful inclusion of the cinematic discourse of history in the sphere of research practice and in the construction of educational space.","PeriodicalId":212815,"journal":{"name":"Historical Search","volume":"2 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Historical Search","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.47026/2712-9454-2023-4-2-51-61","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The article is devoted to the interdisciplinary problem of using cinematic interpretations of the historical past in the professional activity of a historian, including its research and educational tasks. The purpose of the study is to create opportunities for a scientifically based definition of a historian’s professional “niche” when he turns to the cinematic discourse of the historical past. Materials and methods. To determine the methodological foundations of selected cognitive models, the principles of neo-positivism, narrative philosophy, methods of discursive analysis of texts, including such features of the language of cinema as imagery and pronounced symbolism, as well as the provisions of phenomenological epistemology, were used. In their unity, these cognitive theories of culture allowed the author of the article to present a verified version of the results obtained by analyzing interpretations of the creative intent of film directors found in the scientific literature. Study results. In the first part of the article, the main debatable aspects of the problem are considered in line with modern scientific trends, convincing of the relevance of the research undertaken. In its second part, the analysis of existing research practices in this field of knowledge is presented, the algorithms for reading historical information in feature films characteristic of each variant are identified and disclosed. Conclusions. The final part of the article contains as results the definition for each of the identified research models, conventionally called “descriptive-informational”, “imagological”, “source studies” and “memorial”. The classification is based on the criterion of goal-setting and the scientific apparatus associated with it – the methodological approach, methods, the object and the subject of research. The author of the article gives assessment of their importance in the interdisciplinary paradigm of scientific historical creativity, thereby determining possible prospects for the development of historians’ research practice in the field of cognition of the past based on cinematography works. It seems obvious that the practical significance of observations proposed by the article’s author about the possibilities of solving the problem posed by not only active, but also critically meaningful inclusion of the cinematic discourse of history in the sphere of research practice and in the construction of educational space.
历史学家镜头中的历史电影话语
本文致力于在历史学家的专业活动中使用电影对过去历史的解释的跨学科问题,包括其研究和教育任务。这项研究的目的是为历史学家在转向历史的电影话语时,对其专业“利基”的科学定义创造机会。材料和方法。为了确定选定的认知模型的方法论基础,使用了新实证主义原则、叙事哲学、文本的话语分析方法,包括电影语言的图像和明显的象征主义等特征,以及现象学认识论的规定。这些文化认知理论的统一性使本文作者能够对科学文献中对电影导演创作意图的解释进行分析,从而得出的结果提出一个经过验证的版本。研究的结果。在文章的第一部分,该问题的主要有争议的方面被认为符合现代科学趋势,令人信服的相关性进行的研究。在第二部分中,分析了这一知识领域的现有研究实践,确定并公开了用于读取各变体特征的故事片历史信息的算法。结论。文章的最后一部分包含了对每一种已确定的研究模型的定义,这些模型通常被称为“描述性信息”、“图像学”、“来源研究”和“纪念性”。分类是基于目标设定的标准和与之相关的科学工具——方法论、方法、研究对象和主题。本文作者评估了它们在科学历史创造的跨学科范式中的重要性,从而确定了历史学家在基于电影作品的过去认知领域的研究实践发展的可能前景。显而易见的是,文章作者所提出的关于在研究实践领域和教育空间建设中不仅积极地,而且具有批判意义地纳入电影历史话语所提出的解决问题的可能性的观察的现实意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信