The Uprising of 1648 in the Interpretations of Polish Historians at the End of the XIXth Century – 1939th

I. Chava
{"title":"The Uprising of 1648 in the Interpretations of Polish Historians at the End of the XIXth Century – 1939th","authors":"I. Chava","doi":"10.31652/2411-2143-2021-35-97-108","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The purpose of this article is to study the peculiarities of depicting the events of the first year of the national liberation war under the leadership of B. Khmelnytsky in the Polish historical science at the end XIXth century - 1939, and in particular the battles near Zhovti Vody, Korsun, Pyliavtsi, the siege of the Cossack-Tatar troops of Lviv; investigate various historical myths, stereotypes and evaluation patterns used by Polish historians in depicting the events of Khmelnytsky region; analyze the influences of historiographical concepts, cultural trends and political ideologies on the image of the history of the Polish-Cossack war in 1648. Methodology of the research: the work was based on such principles as historicism and scientific objectivity. Both general scientific (systematization, typology, retrospection) and a number of special historical methods (critical analysis and synthesis of source material, historical-genetic, historical-comparative, etc.) were used. The scientific novelty lies in the fact that a systematic analysis of the depiction of the events of Khmelnytsky region in 1648 in the Polish historiography of the end XIXth century – 1939 was done in this article for the first time in domestic science and the influences of political ideas on the interpretation of historical material were analysed by scientists. Conclusions. The history of the first year of the national liberation war of Ukrainians under the leadership of B. Khmelnytsky attracted considerable attention of Polish researchers and was considered as one of the cornerstones of the history of the Commonwealth, and especially of the Polish-Ukrainian relations. Due to the severity of the events, they were overgrown with various historical myths and were often interpreted through the prism of political conditions and various ideological trends. Thus, the symbolic meaning was given to the battle of Yellow Waters, which historians saw as the last battle of the Polish people for possession of the Black Sea steppes. The influence of the concept of \"Poland's stronghold of Christianity\" and the ideas of inter-civilizational struggle on the events of the Polish-Cossack war is revealed.","PeriodicalId":417313,"journal":{"name":"Scientific Papers of the Vinnytsia Mykhailo Kotsyiubynskyi State Pedagogical University. Series: History","volume":"20 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-03-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Scientific Papers of the Vinnytsia Mykhailo Kotsyiubynskyi State Pedagogical University. Series: History","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31652/2411-2143-2021-35-97-108","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The purpose of this article is to study the peculiarities of depicting the events of the first year of the national liberation war under the leadership of B. Khmelnytsky in the Polish historical science at the end XIXth century - 1939, and in particular the battles near Zhovti Vody, Korsun, Pyliavtsi, the siege of the Cossack-Tatar troops of Lviv; investigate various historical myths, stereotypes and evaluation patterns used by Polish historians in depicting the events of Khmelnytsky region; analyze the influences of historiographical concepts, cultural trends and political ideologies on the image of the history of the Polish-Cossack war in 1648. Methodology of the research: the work was based on such principles as historicism and scientific objectivity. Both general scientific (systematization, typology, retrospection) and a number of special historical methods (critical analysis and synthesis of source material, historical-genetic, historical-comparative, etc.) were used. The scientific novelty lies in the fact that a systematic analysis of the depiction of the events of Khmelnytsky region in 1648 in the Polish historiography of the end XIXth century – 1939 was done in this article for the first time in domestic science and the influences of political ideas on the interpretation of historical material were analysed by scientists. Conclusions. The history of the first year of the national liberation war of Ukrainians under the leadership of B. Khmelnytsky attracted considerable attention of Polish researchers and was considered as one of the cornerstones of the history of the Commonwealth, and especially of the Polish-Ukrainian relations. Due to the severity of the events, they were overgrown with various historical myths and were often interpreted through the prism of political conditions and various ideological trends. Thus, the symbolic meaning was given to the battle of Yellow Waters, which historians saw as the last battle of the Polish people for possession of the Black Sea steppes. The influence of the concept of "Poland's stronghold of Christianity" and the ideas of inter-civilizational struggle on the events of the Polish-Cossack war is revealed.
19世纪末至1939年波兰历史学家对1648年起义的解读
本文的目的是研究19世纪末- 1939年,在B.赫梅利尼茨基领导下的波兰历史科学中描述民族解放战争第一年事件的特殊性,特别是在佐夫蒂沃季,科尔松,皮利亚夫茨附近的战斗,对利沃夫哥萨克-鞑靼军队的围攻;调查波兰历史学家在描述赫梅利尼茨基地区事件时使用的各种历史神话、刻板印象和评估模式;分析史学概念、文化趋势和政治意识形态对1648年波兰哥萨克战争历史形象的影响。研究方法论:以历史决定论和科学客观性为研究原则。一般的科学(系统化、类型学、回溯)和一些特殊的历史方法(批判分析和源材料的综合、历史-遗传、历史-比较等)都被使用。科学的新颖性在于,本文在国内科学领域首次对19世纪末至1939年波兰史学中对1648年赫梅利尼茨基地区事件的描述进行了系统分析,并分析了政治思想对历史材料解释的影响。结论。赫梅利尼茨基领导下的乌克兰民族解放战争第一年的历史引起了波兰研究人员的极大关注,被认为是联邦历史,特别是波兰-乌克兰关系史的基石之一。由于事件的严重性,它们被各种各样的历史神话所覆盖,并且经常通过政治条件和各种思想趋势的棱镜来解释。因此,黄水之战被赋予了象征意义,历史学家认为这是波兰人民为拥有黑海草原而进行的最后一场战斗。揭示了“基督教的波兰据点”观念和文明间斗争思想对波哥萨克战争事件的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信