Academic Performance in Different Learning Formats: Contribution of Procrastination and Coping Strategies

LiudmilaV. Kavun, AnastasiaV. Varnavskaya
{"title":"Academic Performance in Different Learning Formats: Contribution of Procrastination and Coping Strategies","authors":"LiudmilaV. Kavun, AnastasiaV. Varnavskaya","doi":"10.3897/ap.5.e0775","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The purpose of this research was to study the effect on academic performance of changing the learning format and the contribution of procrastination and coping strategies to the academic performance of students, when changing the learning format from contact to distance. Research methods: analysis of academic performance, Lay General Procrastination Scale in adapted by Vindeker, COPE Kraver in adaptation by Rasskazova; Greenglass Proactive Coping Behavior questionnaire, adaptation by Starchenkova; mathematical methods. The sample size was 151 people. According to the results: 1) The learning format affects the academic performance of students. The nature of this influence, along with external factors, is mediated by a number of psychological characteristics of students, in particular, the level of procrastination and the nature of coping strategies. 2) When switching from contact to distance learning, the success of educational activities was associated with the level of academic performance. The transition to the distance format led to an improvement in the performance of senior students. 3) Students with low academic performance have a higher level of general procrastination associated with delay in making vital decisions than students with high academic performance. 4) Students with low academic performance are more likely to use humor as a coping strategy, and this is associated with a deterioration in academic performance. High academic students are more likely to find emotional support, and this is associated with improved academic performance. The research result can be used in the development of work programs of academic disciplines in a differentiated manner for senior and junior students.","PeriodicalId":319757,"journal":{"name":"VII International Forum on Teacher Education","volume":"64 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-02-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"VII International Forum on Teacher Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3897/ap.5.e0775","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The purpose of this research was to study the effect on academic performance of changing the learning format and the contribution of procrastination and coping strategies to the academic performance of students, when changing the learning format from contact to distance. Research methods: analysis of academic performance, Lay General Procrastination Scale in adapted by Vindeker, COPE Kraver in adaptation by Rasskazova; Greenglass Proactive Coping Behavior questionnaire, adaptation by Starchenkova; mathematical methods. The sample size was 151 people. According to the results: 1) The learning format affects the academic performance of students. The nature of this influence, along with external factors, is mediated by a number of psychological characteristics of students, in particular, the level of procrastination and the nature of coping strategies. 2) When switching from contact to distance learning, the success of educational activities was associated with the level of academic performance. The transition to the distance format led to an improvement in the performance of senior students. 3) Students with low academic performance have a higher level of general procrastination associated with delay in making vital decisions than students with high academic performance. 4) Students with low academic performance are more likely to use humor as a coping strategy, and this is associated with a deterioration in academic performance. High academic students are more likely to find emotional support, and this is associated with improved academic performance. The research result can be used in the development of work programs of academic disciplines in a differentiated manner for senior and junior students.
不同学习形式的学习成绩:拖延和应对策略的影响
本研究的目的是研究改变学习形式对学生学习成绩的影响,以及当学习形式由接触转变为远程时,拖延和应对策略对学生学习成绩的贡献。研究方法:学习成绩分析,Vindeker改编的Lay一般拖延量表,Rasskazova改编的COPE Kraver量表;Greenglass积极应对行为问卷(Starchenkova);数学方法。样本量为151人。结果表明:1)学习形式影响学生的学习成绩。这种影响的性质以及外部因素是由学生的一些心理特征,特别是拖延的程度和应对策略的性质所调节的。2)从接触学习转向远程学习时,教育活动的成功与否与学生的学习成绩水平相关。向远程教学模式的转变使高年级学生的学习成绩有所提高。3)与学习成绩好的学生相比,学习成绩差的学生在做出重要决定时更容易出现一般性拖延症。学习成绩差的学生更有可能使用幽默作为应对策略,这与学习成绩的恶化有关。高学历的学生更容易找到情感支持,这与学习成绩的提高有关。研究结果可为高年级学生和低年级学生制定差异化的学科工作方案提供参考。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信