IMPACT OF CHEMICAL AND NATURAL WATER SAVING SOIL AMENDMENTS ON GROWTH, YIELD AND WATER USE EFFICIENCY OF ''WASHINGTON NAVEL'' ORANGE TREES UNDER DEFICIT IRRIGATION CONDITIONS

M.M.S. Abo El- Enien, E. Moursi
{"title":"IMPACT OF CHEMICAL AND NATURAL WATER SAVING SOIL AMENDMENTS ON GROWTH, YIELD AND WATER USE EFFICIENCY OF ''WASHINGTON NAVEL'' ORANGE TREES UNDER DEFICIT IRRIGATION CONDITIONS","authors":"M.M.S. Abo El- Enien, E. Moursi","doi":"10.21608/mjppf.2019.123006","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Due to the limited water resources, it is necessary to study the best ways to reduce the use of irrigation water, increase the efficiency of water use without affecting the growth of trees and maintain the production of citrus productivity under these circumstances. Afield experiment was conducted during 2015 and 2016 seasons at El-Nubaria region, Beheira Governorate to investigate the effect of three irrigation water regimes (100, 75 and 50% of actual irrigation practiced in the orchard) and soil application of hydrogel (50 and 100g/tree) and organic plant residues (3.5 and 6.5kg/tree) as chemical and natural water absorbing soil amendments on growth, yield and water use efficiency on ''Washington Navel'' orange trees grown on a sandy soil under drip irrigation system. The obtained results point out that, applied organic plant residues at rate 6.5 kg/tree or 100g/tree hydrogel under moderate irrigation rate (T5 and T3) significantly increased the most growth parameters (canopy volume, number of shoots/branch and leaf area) , fruit set, leaf relative water content and decrease fruit drop%. Moderate irrigation rate + 100g/tree hydrogel (T3) and control (T1) were the best treatments in increasing leaf N,P,K and Ca contents. The highest yield (78.8 and78.47) and (80.36 and 79.06 kg/tree) was obtained by T3 and T5 in 2015 and 2016 seasons, respectively. All treatments increased water use efficiency especially T9 (5.64 and 5.46 kg/m3) compared with the control which recorded the lowest values (3.16 and 2.93 kg/m3). Control (T1) followed by T3 and T5 tended to improve the physical fruit properties meanwhile T8 and T9 increased the most of chemical fruit quality. The lowest fruit splitting% (6.58 and 5.87 %) coated with T3 and T5. Soil microorganisms content and dehydrogenase activity were increased under moderate irrigation rate + 3.5 or 6.5 organic plant residues (T4 and T5) compared to the control (T1).","PeriodicalId":215483,"journal":{"name":"Menoufia Journal of Plant Production","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Menoufia Journal of Plant Production","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21608/mjppf.2019.123006","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Due to the limited water resources, it is necessary to study the best ways to reduce the use of irrigation water, increase the efficiency of water use without affecting the growth of trees and maintain the production of citrus productivity under these circumstances. Afield experiment was conducted during 2015 and 2016 seasons at El-Nubaria region, Beheira Governorate to investigate the effect of three irrigation water regimes (100, 75 and 50% of actual irrigation practiced in the orchard) and soil application of hydrogel (50 and 100g/tree) and organic plant residues (3.5 and 6.5kg/tree) as chemical and natural water absorbing soil amendments on growth, yield and water use efficiency on ''Washington Navel'' orange trees grown on a sandy soil under drip irrigation system. The obtained results point out that, applied organic plant residues at rate 6.5 kg/tree or 100g/tree hydrogel under moderate irrigation rate (T5 and T3) significantly increased the most growth parameters (canopy volume, number of shoots/branch and leaf area) , fruit set, leaf relative water content and decrease fruit drop%. Moderate irrigation rate + 100g/tree hydrogel (T3) and control (T1) were the best treatments in increasing leaf N,P,K and Ca contents. The highest yield (78.8 and78.47) and (80.36 and 79.06 kg/tree) was obtained by T3 and T5 in 2015 and 2016 seasons, respectively. All treatments increased water use efficiency especially T9 (5.64 and 5.46 kg/m3) compared with the control which recorded the lowest values (3.16 and 2.93 kg/m3). Control (T1) followed by T3 and T5 tended to improve the physical fruit properties meanwhile T8 and T9 increased the most of chemical fruit quality. The lowest fruit splitting% (6.58 and 5.87 %) coated with T3 and T5. Soil microorganisms content and dehydrogenase activity were increased under moderate irrigation rate + 3.5 or 6.5 organic plant residues (T4 and T5) compared to the control (T1).
亏缺灌溉条件下化学和自然节水土壤改良剂对“华盛顿脐橙”生长、产量和水分利用效率的影响
由于水资源有限,在这种情况下,有必要研究减少灌溉用水,在不影响树木生长的情况下提高用水效率,保持柑橘生产力生产的最佳途径。2015年和2016年,在Beheira省El-Nubaria地区进行了现场试验,研究了三种灌溉水量(果园实际灌溉水量的100%、75%和50%)以及水凝胶(50和100克/树)和有机植物残茬(3.5和6.5公斤/树)作为化学和自然吸水土壤改良剂对生长的影响。滴灌系统下砂质土壤上“华盛顿脐橙”树的产量和水分利用效率。结果表明,在中等灌溉量(T5和T3)下,施用有机植物残留物6.5 kg/棵或100g/棵水凝胶,可显著提高植株的大部分生长参数(冠层体积、芽/枝数和叶面积)、坐果率和叶片相对含水量,降低落果率。适量灌水+ 100g/株水凝胶(T3)和对照(T1)是提高叶片N、P、K、Ca含量的最佳处理。T3和T5在2015年和2016年的产量最高,分别为78.8和78.47 kg/株和80.36和79.06 kg/株。与对照相比,各处理均提高了水分利用效率,特别是T9(5.64和5.46 kg/m3),其最低值为3.16和2.93 kg/m3。对照(T1)后处理T3和T5有利于改善果实物理性状,T8和T9对果实化学品质的提高最大。T3和T5处理的果实劈裂率最低,分别为6.58%和5.87%。适量灌水量+ 3.5或6.5有机植物残茬(T4和T5)处理土壤微生物含量和脱氢酶活性均较对照(T1)有所提高。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信