From a private collection to a state museum: Pauls Stradiņš Museum of the History of Medicine

J. Salaks, Kaspars Vanags
{"title":"From a private collection to a state museum: Pauls Stradiņš Museum of the History of Medicine","authors":"J. Salaks, Kaspars Vanags","doi":"10.12697/poa.2021.30.1.05","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In 2021, Pauls Stradiņš Museum of the History of Medicine in Rīga (Latvia) will celebrate 60 years since it acquired the status of a state museum. This article describes the history of its creation, the work of the museum from 1961 to 2019, its basic functions and structures, the consequences of ideological deviations, and outlines the vision for the future development of the museum. \nOn the one hand, the museum is based on the idea and collection of Doctor Pauls Stradiņš, an avid enthusiast, and his skill in keeping, supplementing, and improving his collection and legalising it as a state-run institution. However, no less important has been the attitude of the public and the authorities towards this institution, public support for P. Stradiņš’ idea. The relatively liberal attitude towards the initially private museum is explained by the fact that healthcare was declared one of the priorities of the Soviet Union, and the history of medicine was ideologically a relatively neutral field. In addition, the “national” moment was less emphasised in P. Stradiņš Museum – in the context of Latvia, the museum mainly showed folk medicine, fighting against epidemics, medicine in cities but did not highlight medical achievements during the years of Latvia’s independence. \nThe paradigm of the museum has changed today. Aspects of medicine, as in natural and technological sciences, which are within the competence of social history, anthropology and cultural theory have come to the fore. The experience of the global pandemic has brought conflict and tension into and around health in public opinion. This calls for a review of the six decades of exhibition traditions and the dynamics of the relationship with the museum’s existing and potential audience, which has been cultivated for six decades.","PeriodicalId":173079,"journal":{"name":"Papers on Anthropology","volume":"316 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-09-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Papers on Anthropology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.12697/poa.2021.30.1.05","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In 2021, Pauls Stradiņš Museum of the History of Medicine in Rīga (Latvia) will celebrate 60 years since it acquired the status of a state museum. This article describes the history of its creation, the work of the museum from 1961 to 2019, its basic functions and structures, the consequences of ideological deviations, and outlines the vision for the future development of the museum. On the one hand, the museum is based on the idea and collection of Doctor Pauls Stradiņš, an avid enthusiast, and his skill in keeping, supplementing, and improving his collection and legalising it as a state-run institution. However, no less important has been the attitude of the public and the authorities towards this institution, public support for P. Stradiņš’ idea. The relatively liberal attitude towards the initially private museum is explained by the fact that healthcare was declared one of the priorities of the Soviet Union, and the history of medicine was ideologically a relatively neutral field. In addition, the “national” moment was less emphasised in P. Stradiņš Museum – in the context of Latvia, the museum mainly showed folk medicine, fighting against epidemics, medicine in cities but did not highlight medical achievements during the years of Latvia’s independence. The paradigm of the museum has changed today. Aspects of medicine, as in natural and technological sciences, which are within the competence of social history, anthropology and cultural theory have come to the fore. The experience of the global pandemic has brought conflict and tension into and around health in public opinion. This calls for a review of the six decades of exhibition traditions and the dynamics of the relationship with the museum’s existing and potential audience, which has been cultivated for six decades.
从私人收藏到国家博物馆:保罗Stradiņš医学史博物馆
2021年,位于Rīga(拉脱维亚)的保罗斯Stradiņš医学史博物馆将庆祝其获得国家博物馆地位60周年。本文介绍了博物馆的创建历史、1961年至2019年的工作、基本功能和结构、思想偏差的后果,并勾勒了博物馆未来发展的愿景。一方面,博物馆是基于保罗博士Stradiņš的想法和收藏,他是一个狂热的爱好者,他的技能是保持、补充和改进他的收藏,并使其作为一个国有机构合法化。然而,同样重要的是公众和当局对这一机构的态度,公众对P. Stradiņš想法的支持。人们对最初的私人博物馆持相对自由的态度,这是因为医疗保健被宣布为苏联的优先事项之一,而医学史在意识形态上是一个相对中立的领域。此外,P. Stradiņš博物馆较少强调"民族"时刻——在拉脱维亚的背景下,博物馆主要展示民间医学、抗击流行病、城市医学,但没有突出拉脱维亚独立期间的医疗成就。如今,博物馆的模式发生了变化。医学的各个方面,就像自然科学和技术科学一样,在社会历史、人类学和文化理论的能力范围内,已经脱颖而出。全球大流行病的经验在公众舆论中给卫生问题及其周围带来了冲突和紧张。这需要对六十年的展览传统以及与博物馆现有和潜在观众之间的动态关系进行回顾,这些关系已经培养了六十年。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信