The Demand for Information

G. Sims
{"title":"The Demand for Information","authors":"G. Sims","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.1630244","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"I use a new measure of investor attention and measure its affect on the returns of winner and loser portfolios over a holding period of up to 52 weeks. Whilst I do not find any relationship between Stock Information Demand and price momentum, I do find that increases in investor attention affect the demand for stocks, which for ‘winner stocks’ in turn pushes prices up. I find evidence of this effect in a small sample of large, highly traded, and closely followed firms, i.e. the S&P500.My measure of attention is derived from the Google Insights for Search webpage, which allows access to the relative volumes of search criteria submitted to Google each week, since 2004. This measure of attention, which I call the Stock Information Demand (SID) is a more direct measure of market participants’ behaviour than previous studies have used.I evaluate the returns to the S&P500 constituents over five years, and find that stocks with high degrees of Stock Information Demand(SID) that have increased in price over the previous 4 weeks tend to continue to increase in price for a further 4 weeks. Stocks with low levels of SID do not show the same continued price appreciation. Further to this, I also find less robust evidence that stocks which have declined in price over the previous 4 weeks, and have not been subject to high levels of SID show a continued longer term price decline, out to 52 weeks in some cases.I am not able to measure any significant degrees of price reversal, and hence over reaction, or of robust under reaction, so am not able to add further evidence to the two behaviour models provided by K. Daniel, Hirshleifer, & Subrahmanyam (1998) or Barberis, Shleifer, & Vishny (1998). My results support the previous findings of Hong, Lim, & Stein (2000) and of Chan (2003), in that stocks react quickly to good news, and slowly to bad news. My results also support previous studies of attention, such as Barber & Odean (2008), and the related work Barber, Odean, & Zhu (2006), showing that stocks subject to investor’s attention do change in price, and that noise traders are capable of moving market prices.","PeriodicalId":400873,"journal":{"name":"Microeconomics: Information","volume":"94 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2010-06-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Microeconomics: Information","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1630244","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

I use a new measure of investor attention and measure its affect on the returns of winner and loser portfolios over a holding period of up to 52 weeks. Whilst I do not find any relationship between Stock Information Demand and price momentum, I do find that increases in investor attention affect the demand for stocks, which for ‘winner stocks’ in turn pushes prices up. I find evidence of this effect in a small sample of large, highly traded, and closely followed firms, i.e. the S&P500.My measure of attention is derived from the Google Insights for Search webpage, which allows access to the relative volumes of search criteria submitted to Google each week, since 2004. This measure of attention, which I call the Stock Information Demand (SID) is a more direct measure of market participants’ behaviour than previous studies have used.I evaluate the returns to the S&P500 constituents over five years, and find that stocks with high degrees of Stock Information Demand(SID) that have increased in price over the previous 4 weeks tend to continue to increase in price for a further 4 weeks. Stocks with low levels of SID do not show the same continued price appreciation. Further to this, I also find less robust evidence that stocks which have declined in price over the previous 4 weeks, and have not been subject to high levels of SID show a continued longer term price decline, out to 52 weeks in some cases.I am not able to measure any significant degrees of price reversal, and hence over reaction, or of robust under reaction, so am not able to add further evidence to the two behaviour models provided by K. Daniel, Hirshleifer, & Subrahmanyam (1998) or Barberis, Shleifer, & Vishny (1998). My results support the previous findings of Hong, Lim, & Stein (2000) and of Chan (2003), in that stocks react quickly to good news, and slowly to bad news. My results also support previous studies of attention, such as Barber & Odean (2008), and the related work Barber, Odean, & Zhu (2006), showing that stocks subject to investor’s attention do change in price, and that noise traders are capable of moving market prices.
对信息的需求
我使用了一种衡量投资者注意力的新方法,并在长达52周的持有期中衡量其对赢家和输家投资组合回报的影响。虽然我没有发现股票信息需求和价格动量之间的任何关系,但我确实发现投资者关注的增加影响了对股票的需求,而对“赢家股票”的需求反过来又推高了价格。我在一个小样本中发现了这种效应的证据,这些样本包括交易量大、受关注程度高的公司,比如标准普尔500指数。我对注意力的衡量来自Google Insights for Search网页,该网页允许访问自2004年以来每周提交给谷歌的搜索标准的相对数量。这种注意力的度量,我称之为股票信息需求(SID),比以前的研究更直接地衡量了市场参与者的行为。我评估了标准普尔500指数成分股在五年内的回报,发现股票信息需求(SID)程度高的股票在过去4周内价格上涨,在接下来的4周内价格往往会继续上涨。低SID水平的股票没有表现出同样的持续价格上涨。此外,我还发现一些不太有力的证据表明,在过去4周内价格下跌的股票,没有受到高水平SID的影响,在某些情况下,价格会持续下跌52周。我无法测量任何显著程度的价格反转,因此过度反应,或强烈的反应,因此我无法为K. Daniel, Hirshleifer, & Subrahmanyam(1998)或Barberis, Shleifer, & Vishny(1998)提供的两种行为模型添加进一步的证据。我的研究结果支持Hong, Lim, & Stein(2000)和Chan(2003)之前的发现,即股票对好消息反应迅速,对坏消息反应缓慢。我的研究结果也支持了先前关于注意力的研究,如Barber & Odean(2008),以及Barber, Odean, & Zhu(2006)的相关工作,表明受投资者注意力影响的股票确实会改变价格,噪音交易者能够影响市场价格。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信