Interactional Metadiscourse in Students’ Abstracts across Studies at Universitas Qomaruddin

Eva Nur Mazidah, L. Masruroh
{"title":"Interactional Metadiscourse in Students’ Abstracts across Studies at Universitas Qomaruddin","authors":"Eva Nur Mazidah, L. Masruroh","doi":"10.29300/ling.v8i2.6443","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Writing is one of the essential things that all students must do. In writing, the delivery of ideas needs to be arranged so that the writing is easy to understand and practical. One type of writing is when students write a research article for their final project or thesis. Abstract writing is one of the crucial sections of a final project or thesis because the abstract contains an outline of the research they did. In writing abstracts, metadiscourse markers were possible because they aimed to organize a sequence of ideas, attract readers' attention, and indicate how important the information was presented. This study investigated one hundred and twenty abstract theses from six study programs at Universitas Qomaruddin. They are English Department (PBI), Mathematic Department (PMT), Industrial Engineering (TI), Electrical Engineering (TE), Mechanical Engineering (MS), and Informatics Engineering (IF). Hyland (2005) formulated the interactional metadiscourse investigated as the primary reference. The results showed that all six study programs applied interactional metadiscourse markers when writing their abstracts. Moredespite different styles and preferences in applying markers. In terms of usage of overall metadiscourse, PBI applied the most markers, while MS applied the least. In terms of variants of metadiscourse, PBI also applied the most, and MS applied the least varied markers. The reasons behind more or less usage of interactional markers were influenced by how familiar they were with using English, as it also revealed their writing style. PBI is one example that their exposure to English pretty helps them vary the way they arrange their ideas in their abstracts. However, other surprising groups were PMT  and IF groups, which frequently showed the uses of metadiscourse markers. It also strengthened that English was not only dominated by English department students. It was more on how this language was known to many students at Universitas Qomaruddin. It is hoped that English as one of the international languages is no longer a big problem for students, especially in the case of abstract writing.","PeriodicalId":298210,"journal":{"name":"Linguists : Journal Of Linguistics and Language Teaching","volume":"17 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Linguists : Journal Of Linguistics and Language Teaching","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.29300/ling.v8i2.6443","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Writing is one of the essential things that all students must do. In writing, the delivery of ideas needs to be arranged so that the writing is easy to understand and practical. One type of writing is when students write a research article for their final project or thesis. Abstract writing is one of the crucial sections of a final project or thesis because the abstract contains an outline of the research they did. In writing abstracts, metadiscourse markers were possible because they aimed to organize a sequence of ideas, attract readers' attention, and indicate how important the information was presented. This study investigated one hundred and twenty abstract theses from six study programs at Universitas Qomaruddin. They are English Department (PBI), Mathematic Department (PMT), Industrial Engineering (TI), Electrical Engineering (TE), Mechanical Engineering (MS), and Informatics Engineering (IF). Hyland (2005) formulated the interactional metadiscourse investigated as the primary reference. The results showed that all six study programs applied interactional metadiscourse markers when writing their abstracts. Moredespite different styles and preferences in applying markers. In terms of usage of overall metadiscourse, PBI applied the most markers, while MS applied the least. In terms of variants of metadiscourse, PBI also applied the most, and MS applied the least varied markers. The reasons behind more or less usage of interactional markers were influenced by how familiar they were with using English, as it also revealed their writing style. PBI is one example that their exposure to English pretty helps them vary the way they arrange their ideas in their abstracts. However, other surprising groups were PMT  and IF groups, which frequently showed the uses of metadiscourse markers. It also strengthened that English was not only dominated by English department students. It was more on how this language was known to many students at Universitas Qomaruddin. It is hoped that English as one of the international languages is no longer a big problem for students, especially in the case of abstract writing.
南京大学学生摘要的互动元话语研究
写作是所有学生必须做的重要事情之一。在写作中,思想的传递需要安排好,这样写作才容易理解和实用。一种类型的写作是当学生为他们的期末项目或论文写一篇研究文章。摘要写作是期末项目或论文的关键部分之一,因为摘要包含了他们所做研究的大纲。在撰写摘要时,元话语标记是可能的,因为它们旨在组织一系列想法,吸引读者的注意力,并表明所呈现的信息有多重要。本研究调查了来自古马鲁丁大学六个研究项目的120篇摘要论文。分别是英语系(PBI)、数学系(PMT)、工业工程系(TI)、电气工程系(TE)、机械工程系(MS)和信息工程系(IF)。Hyland(2005)将所研究的互动元话语作为主要参考。结果表明,六个研究项目在撰写摘要时均使用了互动元话语标记。尽管使用标记的风格和偏好不同。在整体元话语的使用方面,PBI使用的标记最多,而MS使用的标记最少。在元话语变体方面,PBI应用最多,MS应用最少。互动标记语使用多或少的原因受到他们对英语使用的熟悉程度的影响,因为这也揭示了他们的写作风格。PBI就是一个例子,他们接触英语很好地帮助他们改变了在摘要中组织思想的方式。然而,其他令人惊讶的组是PMT和IF组,它们经常显示使用元话语标记。这也进一步表明,英语并不仅仅是英语系学生的天下。它更多的是关于许多大学的学生如何知道这种语言。希望英语作为国际语言之一,对学生来说不再是一个大问题,特别是在抽象写作的情况下。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信