APPLICATIONS OF TRAVELING SALESMAN PROBLEM ON THE OPTIMAL SIGHTSEEING ORDERS OF MACAO WORLD HERITAGE SITES WITH REAL TIME OR DISTANCE VALUES BETWEEN EVERY PAIR OF SITES

Kin Neng Tong, Iat In Fong, Inge Li, Chi Him Anthony Cheng, Soi Chak Choi, Hau Xiang Ye, W. Lee
{"title":"APPLICATIONS OF TRAVELING SALESMAN PROBLEM ON THE OPTIMAL SIGHTSEEING ORDERS OF MACAO WORLD HERITAGE SITES WITH REAL TIME OR DISTANCE VALUES BETWEEN EVERY PAIR OF SITES","authors":"Kin Neng Tong, Iat In Fong, Inge Li, Chi Him Anthony Cheng, Soi Chak Choi, Hau Xiang Ye, W. Lee","doi":"10.29121/ijoest.v5.i5.2021.220","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The optimal route of sightseeing orders for visiting every Macao World Heritage Site at exactly once was calculated with Simulated Annealing and Metropolis Algorithm (SAMA) after considering real required time or traveling distance between pairs of sites by either driving a car, taking a bus, or on foot. We found out that, with the optimal tour path, it took roughly 78 minutes for driving a car, 115 minutes on foot, while 117 minutes for taking a bus. On the other hand, the optimal total distance for driving a car would be 13.918 km while for pedestrians to walk, 7.844 km. These results probably mean that there is large space for the improvement on public transportation in this city. Comparison of computation time demanded between the brute- force enumeration of all possible paths and SAMA was also presented, together with animation of the processes for the algorithm to find out the optimal route. It is expected that computation time is astronomically increasing for the brute-force enumeration with more number of sites, while it only takes SAMA much less order of magnitude in time to calculate the optimal solution for larger number of sites. Several optimal options of routes were also provided in each transportation method. However, it is possible that in some types of transportation there could be only one optimal route having no circular or mirrored duplicates.","PeriodicalId":331301,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Engineering Science Technologies","volume":"4 ","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-08-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Engineering Science Technologies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.29121/ijoest.v5.i5.2021.220","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The optimal route of sightseeing orders for visiting every Macao World Heritage Site at exactly once was calculated with Simulated Annealing and Metropolis Algorithm (SAMA) after considering real required time or traveling distance between pairs of sites by either driving a car, taking a bus, or on foot. We found out that, with the optimal tour path, it took roughly 78 minutes for driving a car, 115 minutes on foot, while 117 minutes for taking a bus. On the other hand, the optimal total distance for driving a car would be 13.918 km while for pedestrians to walk, 7.844 km. These results probably mean that there is large space for the improvement on public transportation in this city. Comparison of computation time demanded between the brute- force enumeration of all possible paths and SAMA was also presented, together with animation of the processes for the algorithm to find out the optimal route. It is expected that computation time is astronomically increasing for the brute-force enumeration with more number of sites, while it only takes SAMA much less order of magnitude in time to calculate the optimal solution for larger number of sites. Several optimal options of routes were also provided in each transportation method. However, it is possible that in some types of transportation there could be only one optimal route having no circular or mirrored duplicates.
旅游推销员问题在具有实时或距离值的澳门世界遗产地最优观光顺序中的应用
以驾车、乘车、步行三种方式,综合考虑两地之间实际所需时间和行程距离,采用模拟退火和大都市算法(SAMA)计算出澳门各世界遗产地一次游览的最优顺序路线。我们发现,在最佳的游览路线上,开车大约需要78分钟,步行115分钟,而乘公共汽车需要117分钟。另一方面,驾驶汽车的最佳总距离为13.918 km,行人步行的最佳总距离为7.844 km。这些结果可能意味着这个城市的公共交通还有很大的改进空间。比较了暴力枚举所有可能路径和SAMA算法的计算时间,并给出了算法求出最优路径的过程动画。对于站点数量较多的暴力枚举,预计计算时间会大幅增加,而对于站点数量较多的暴力枚举,计算最优解只需要SAMA少得多的时间。每种运输方式均提供了若干最佳路线选择。然而,在某些类型的运输中,可能只有一条没有循环或镜像副本的最佳路线。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信