Comparative evaluation of the fit of ceramic inlay restorations fabricated with heat-press technique and CAD/CAM systems: A preliminary study

Merve Benli
{"title":"Comparative evaluation of the fit of ceramic inlay restorations fabricated with heat-press technique and CAD/CAM systems: A preliminary study","authors":"Merve Benli","doi":"10.32677/EJMS.2018.V03.I03.005","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective: The objective of this in-vitro study was to evaluate the marginal and internal fit of a lithium disilicate inlays fabricated by two CAD/CAM systems (extra-oral and intra-oral scanning), and conventional heat-press technique. Materials and methods: Mandibular first molars were used for inlay restorations in a typodont model. Three groups (n=12 each) of inlays were fabricated by Computer Aided Design/ Computer Aided Manufacturing (CAD/CAM) technology using intraoral and extraoral scanning devices, and conventional heat-press method. Replica technique was used to assess the discrepancies. Internal and marginal gaps were measured at 4 points on each side with stereomicroscope at 200x magnification. One-way variance analysis test (ANOVA) and paired-samples t-test were used for analyzing the results. Results: The fit values were statistically significantly influenced by the production method in total discrepancy comparisons (p= .000). Intraoral scanner group demonstrated the lowest marginal and internal gap values whereas conventional heat-press group showed the highest results. Statistically significant differences were found for fit values with respect to the groups (p<.001). Conclusion: Within the limitations of the study, restorations fabricated via complete digital workflow demonstrated better marginal and internal accuracy than silicone impressions with conventional heat-press technique.‎","PeriodicalId":363370,"journal":{"name":"Eastern Journal of Medical Sciences","volume":"11 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-09-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Eastern Journal of Medical Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.32677/EJMS.2018.V03.I03.005","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Objective: The objective of this in-vitro study was to evaluate the marginal and internal fit of a lithium disilicate inlays fabricated by two CAD/CAM systems (extra-oral and intra-oral scanning), and conventional heat-press technique. Materials and methods: Mandibular first molars were used for inlay restorations in a typodont model. Three groups (n=12 each) of inlays were fabricated by Computer Aided Design/ Computer Aided Manufacturing (CAD/CAM) technology using intraoral and extraoral scanning devices, and conventional heat-press method. Replica technique was used to assess the discrepancies. Internal and marginal gaps were measured at 4 points on each side with stereomicroscope at 200x magnification. One-way variance analysis test (ANOVA) and paired-samples t-test were used for analyzing the results. Results: The fit values were statistically significantly influenced by the production method in total discrepancy comparisons (p= .000). Intraoral scanner group demonstrated the lowest marginal and internal gap values whereas conventional heat-press group showed the highest results. Statistically significant differences were found for fit values with respect to the groups (p<.001). Conclusion: Within the limitations of the study, restorations fabricated via complete digital workflow demonstrated better marginal and internal accuracy than silicone impressions with conventional heat-press technique.‎
热压技术与CAD/CAM系统制备陶瓷镶嵌体修复体配合度的比较研究
目的:本体外研究的目的是评估两种CAD/CAM系统(口腔外和口腔内扫描)和传统热压技术制造的二硅酸锂嵌体的边缘和内部配合度。材料与方法:采用下颌第一磨牙嵌体修复牙型模型。采用计算机辅助设计/计算机辅助制造(CAD/CAM)技术,采用口腔内、口腔外扫描装置和常规热压法制作三组嵌体,每组12例。采用复制技术评估差异。用体视显微镜在每侧4个点测量内部和边缘间隙,放大倍数为200倍。采用单因素方差分析(ANOVA)和配对样本t检验对结果进行分析。结果:在总差异比较中,生产方法对拟合值的影响有统计学意义(p= .000)。口腔内扫描组的边缘值和内间隙值最低,而常规热压组的结果最高。各组间拟合值差异有统计学意义(p< 0.001)。结论:在研究的限制下,通过完整的数字工作流程制作的修复体比传统热压技术的硅胶印模具有更好的边缘和内部精度
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信