MERKINĖS SENIŪNO MATO OGINSKIO KASDIENYBĖ: ŪKINIŲ IR TEISMINIŲ REIKALŲ VERPETUOSE

Adam Stankevič
{"title":"MERKINĖS SENIŪNO MATO OGINSKIO KASDIENYBĖ: ŪKINIŲ IR TEISMINIŲ REIKALŲ VERPETUOSE","authors":"Adam Stankevič","doi":"10.33918/XVIIIASTUDIJOS/T.4/A4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The article analyses some episodes from biography and the daily life of elder of\nMerkinė, vogt and colonel of a petyhorcy unit of the armed forces of the Grand\nDuchy of Lithuania Mateusz Ogiński (1738–1786). On the basis of the documents\npreserved in the Ogiński foundation of the Lithuanian State history archive\n(F. 1177), the article argues that Mateusz Ogiński was mainly occupied with the\nmaintenance of his properties and litigation in courts, not actually seeking any\npolitical or public career. He personally issued directions to the stewards of his\nproperties and controlled execution of his orders. Somewhere close to the First\nPartition of the Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth (1772) he was known for the\ndetailed regulation of his economic activities. He put effort to concentrate in his\nhands some real estate (by buying plots and houses in Merkinė), invested and\ndeveloped various businesses (renting a windmill and a pub, operating a coffee\nshop, building a sawmill and a brickyard, fishing, shipping timber to Konigsberg,\nrenovating Merkinė’s town hall, etc.). Later M. Ogiński was often renting out his\nproperties to other individuals, but that had a negative influence on his possessions.\nLifestyle that disregarded the income made M. Ogiński drown in debt early,\nand he entered a loop of having to start borrowing to pay debts. Elder of Merkinė\nOgiński would borrow and spend large sums of money to make purchases of various\nitems of luxury abroad and in Lithuania (clothes, jewellery, alcohol, species,\nfruits, etc.), and to maintain his manor and even a folk music group. M. Ogiński\nlitigated in many Lithuanian courts and, judging from his letters (and quite many\nof them survived), he would have inhabited these litigation processes, taking\ninterest in legal nuances and using different opportunities to influence court\nprocesses to his advantage (making acquaintance with judges, looking for third\nparty interceders, writing letters to judges, and personally participating in court\nproceedings). Most common lawsuits against him were about unpaid debts, yet\nhis own claims were against stewards of his properties, and real estate rights.\n\nKeywords: eldership of Merkinė, the Ogiński, daily routine, economics, courts.","PeriodicalId":407662,"journal":{"name":"Lietuvos Didžioji Kunigaikštystė Visuomenė. Kasdienybės istorija","volume":"14 12","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-10-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Lietuvos Didžioji Kunigaikštystė Visuomenė. Kasdienybės istorija","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.33918/XVIIIASTUDIJOS/T.4/A4","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

The article analyses some episodes from biography and the daily life of elder of Merkinė, vogt and colonel of a petyhorcy unit of the armed forces of the Grand Duchy of Lithuania Mateusz Ogiński (1738–1786). On the basis of the documents preserved in the Ogiński foundation of the Lithuanian State history archive (F. 1177), the article argues that Mateusz Ogiński was mainly occupied with the maintenance of his properties and litigation in courts, not actually seeking any political or public career. He personally issued directions to the stewards of his properties and controlled execution of his orders. Somewhere close to the First Partition of the Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth (1772) he was known for the detailed regulation of his economic activities. He put effort to concentrate in his hands some real estate (by buying plots and houses in Merkinė), invested and developed various businesses (renting a windmill and a pub, operating a coffee shop, building a sawmill and a brickyard, fishing, shipping timber to Konigsberg, renovating Merkinė’s town hall, etc.). Later M. Ogiński was often renting out his properties to other individuals, but that had a negative influence on his possessions. Lifestyle that disregarded the income made M. Ogiński drown in debt early, and he entered a loop of having to start borrowing to pay debts. Elder of Merkinė Ogiński would borrow and spend large sums of money to make purchases of various items of luxury abroad and in Lithuania (clothes, jewellery, alcohol, species, fruits, etc.), and to maintain his manor and even a folk music group. M. Ogiński litigated in many Lithuanian courts and, judging from his letters (and quite many of them survived), he would have inhabited these litigation processes, taking interest in legal nuances and using different opportunities to influence court processes to his advantage (making acquaintance with judges, looking for third party interceders, writing letters to judges, and personally participating in court proceedings). Most common lawsuits against him were about unpaid debts, yet his own claims were against stewards of his properties, and real estate rights. Keywords: eldership of Merkinė, the Ogiński, daily routine, economics, courts.
本文分析了马特乌什Ogiński(1738-1786年)马特乌什大公国武装部队中校梅尔金乌斯的传记和日常生活中的一些片段。根据立陶宛国家历史档案馆Ogiński基金会保存的文件(F。1177),文章认为Mateusz Ogiński主要忙于维护他的财产和在法庭上的诉讼,实际上并没有寻求任何政治或公共事业。他亲自向他的财产的管家发出指示,并控制他的命令的执行。在波兰立陶宛联邦第一次分裂(1772年)前后,他以对经济活动的详细管理而闻名。他把精力集中在自己手中的一些房地产(通过在梅尔金伊购买土地和房屋),投资和发展各种业务(租用风车和酒吧,经营咖啡馆,建造锯木厂和砖厂,捕鱼,向柯尼斯堡运送木材,翻新梅尔金伊的市政厅,等等)。后来M. Ogiński经常把他的财产出租给其他人,但这对他的财产产生了负面影响。无视收入的生活方式让M. Ogiński早早地陷入了债务的泥水中,为了还债,他不得不开始借钱。MerkinėOgiński的长老会借钱并花费大量的钱来购买国外和立陶宛的各种奢侈品(衣服,珠宝,酒,物种,水果等),并维持他的庄园,甚至是一个民间音乐团体。M. Ogińskilitigated在立陶宛的许多法院工作,从他的信件(其中相当多的信件幸存下来)来看,他会在这些诉讼过程中生活,对法律的细微差别感兴趣,并利用不同的机会影响法庭程序,使其对自己有利(结识法官,寻找第三方调解人,写信给法官,亲自参与法庭程序)。针对他的最常见的诉讼是关于未偿债务,但他自己的索赔是针对他的财产的管家和房地产权利。关键词:梅尔金尼的长辈,Ogiński,日常生活,经济,法院。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信