Electromagnetic Simulation of a Rectangular Cavity: A Comparison between FIT and FDTD Results

J. Leithon
{"title":"Electromagnetic Simulation of a Rectangular Cavity: A Comparison between FIT and FDTD Results","authors":"J. Leithon","doi":"10.1109/CERMA.2008.47","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In order to validate results of simulations using FIT-based algorithm implementation, a representative set of structures is simulated. Rectangular cavities area good chance since their eigenmodes and resonant frequencies can be obtained by means of analytical treatment. An electromagnetic simulation of a rectangular cavity was performed using FIT and FDTD numerical methods. Several differences were found in terms of processing time, accuracy and memory requirements. FDTD code was written using MATLAB. FIT code was written using Python and scientific libraries such as Numpy, Scipy and Pylab.","PeriodicalId":126172,"journal":{"name":"2008 Electronics, Robotics and Automotive Mechanics Conference (CERMA '08)","volume":"210 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2008-09-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2008 Electronics, Robotics and Automotive Mechanics Conference (CERMA '08)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/CERMA.2008.47","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

In order to validate results of simulations using FIT-based algorithm implementation, a representative set of structures is simulated. Rectangular cavities area good chance since their eigenmodes and resonant frequencies can be obtained by means of analytical treatment. An electromagnetic simulation of a rectangular cavity was performed using FIT and FDTD numerical methods. Several differences were found in terms of processing time, accuracy and memory requirements. FDTD code was written using MATLAB. FIT code was written using Python and scientific libraries such as Numpy, Scipy and Pylab.
矩形空腔的电磁仿真:FIT和FDTD结果的比较
为了验证基于fit算法实现的仿真结果,对一组具有代表性的结构进行了仿真。矩形空腔的本征模态和谐振频率可以通过解析处理得到,因此具有很好的利用机会。采用FIT和FDTD数值方法对矩形腔体进行了电磁仿真。在处理时间、准确性和内存要求方面发现了一些差异。用MATLAB编写FDTD代码。FIT代码是使用Python和Numpy、Scipy和Pylab等科学库编写的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信