فقہ مالکی کی امتیازی ادلۃ اجتہاد علمائے اصول فقہ کی آراء کی روشنی میں

Dr. Nadeem Abbas, Farhad Ahmed Bhatti, Sada Hussain Alvi
{"title":"فقہ مالکی کی امتیازی ادلۃ اجتہاد علمائے اصول فقہ کی آراء کی روشنی میں","authors":"Dr. Nadeem Abbas, Farhad Ahmed Bhatti, Sada Hussain Alvi","doi":"10.51665/al-duhaa.003.01.0174","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Imam Malik, a great scholar of Hadith as well as renowned Islamic jurisprudent, founded the Maliki fiqh. One of the distinctions of this fiqh is that the consensus Ahle Madina is considered to be a law, and the legislators seek guidance from those precedents of community consensus during temporal and spatial interpretations of Islamic laws. Besides this, the Ummah consensus as a whole is also regarded as to be the authority. However, in case of any mismatch between the community consensus and active narrations, the Maliki fiqh always prefers the Ahle Madina consensus. So, is the case with the practices of the people of Madina. Therefore, the Maliki scholars would prefer the practices of Ahle-Madina to personal opinion. Not only this, the practices of Ahle Madina can also override a Hadith that has only one reporter. The main sources of derivation of the Islamic laws in Fiqh-e-Maliki are Masaleh Mursilah and Sadd. Some of the important books for deriving Islamic principles in Fiqh-e-Maliki are “Mukhtasarul Muntahaa”, “Yalmukhtasar-ul-Assuli”, “Tanqeeh-ul-Fussul fi Ikhtisarul Mahsul fil-Assul”, “Miftahulwassul ela Bina-el-Fruhh alal-Assul” and “Kitaabul Minhaj fit-Tarteebil Hujaj”.","PeriodicalId":134412,"journal":{"name":"Al-Duhaa","volume":"37 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Al-Duhaa","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.51665/al-duhaa.003.01.0174","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Imam Malik, a great scholar of Hadith as well as renowned Islamic jurisprudent, founded the Maliki fiqh. One of the distinctions of this fiqh is that the consensus Ahle Madina is considered to be a law, and the legislators seek guidance from those precedents of community consensus during temporal and spatial interpretations of Islamic laws. Besides this, the Ummah consensus as a whole is also regarded as to be the authority. However, in case of any mismatch between the community consensus and active narrations, the Maliki fiqh always prefers the Ahle Madina consensus. So, is the case with the practices of the people of Madina. Therefore, the Maliki scholars would prefer the practices of Ahle-Madina to personal opinion. Not only this, the practices of Ahle Madina can also override a Hadith that has only one reporter. The main sources of derivation of the Islamic laws in Fiqh-e-Maliki are Masaleh Mursilah and Sadd. Some of the important books for deriving Islamic principles in Fiqh-e-Maliki are “Mukhtasarul Muntahaa”, “Yalmukhtasar-ul-Assuli”, “Tanqeeh-ul-Fussul fi Ikhtisarul Mahsul fil-Assul”, “Miftahulwassul ela Bina-el-Fruhh alal-Assul” and “Kitaabul Minhaj fit-Tarteebil Hujaj”.
伊玛目马利克是一位伟大的圣训学者,也是著名的伊斯兰法学家,他创立了马利基律法。这一教规的区别之一是,阿勒麦地那共识被认为是一项法律,立法者在对伊斯兰教法进行时间和空间解释时,从社区共识的先例中寻求指导。除此之外,Ummah共识作为一个整体也被视为权威。然而,在社区共识和积极叙述之间出现任何不匹配的情况下,马利基fiqh总是倾向于Ahle Madina共识。麦地那人民的做法也是如此。因此,马利基学者更倾向于阿勒-麦地那的做法,而不是个人意见。不仅如此,阿勒麦地那的做法也可以推翻只有一个记者的圣训。马利基伊斯兰教法的主要来源是Masaleh Mursilah和Sadd。在fiq -e- maliki中推导出伊斯兰原则的一些重要书籍是“Mukhtasarul Muntahaa”,“Yalmukhtasar-ul-Assuli”,“Tanqeeh-ul-Fussul fi Ikhtisarul Mahsul fil-Assul”,“mittatahulwassul ela Bina-el-Fruhh al- assul”和“Kitaabul Minhaj fitt - tarteebil Hujaj”。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信