Study of animal domestication processes using mitochondrial genome polymorphism (review)

K. Pochernyaev
{"title":"Study of animal domestication processes using mitochondrial genome polymorphism (review)","authors":"K. Pochernyaev","doi":"10.37143/0371-4365-2021-75-76-07","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In the article it is presented the results of studies of domestication processes of the\nmain species of agricultural animals, which were carried out with the involvement of\nmitochondrial genome polymorphism. Mitochondrial genome polymorphism was used in\nthe research of domestication processes for the reason that the inclusion of mitochondrial genes in domestic animal populations occurred only as a result of domestication of females. Most often, mitochondrial DNA sequences are used to determine possible wild ancestors, the number of maternal lines and their geographic origin. Domestication can be may be considered as the final phase of intensification of relations between subpopulations of animals or plants and human societies. It consists of several degrees of intensification, which in different ways and during different periods can end with the appearance of domestic animals, plants and microorganisms formed by people. While domestication of wild animals is a form of domestication that does not entail any visible morphological changes, at least from an archeological point of view (Vigne, 2011). The emergence of agriculture in Neolithic times included the domestication of ungulates animals and was a critical moment in human development. The goat (Capra hircus) was one of the first domesticated species of ungulates animals. The main centers of domestication are believed to be the eastern half of the Iranian plateau and eastern Anatolia (Naderi et al., 2008). Sheep (Ovis aries) were domesticated in the so-called Fertile Crescent region about 9,000–8,000 years ago. Mitochondrial DNA polymorphism studies from 323 modern and 221 fossil pig bones collected throughout western Eurasia showed that domestic pigs of Near Eastern origin introduced to Europe during the Neolithic (potentially via two separate routes) reached the Paris Basin at least as early as the 4th th millennium BC. The native European wild pig had also been domesticated by that time, possibly as a direct result of the introduction of domestic pigs from the Middle East (Larson, et al. 2007). After the species of wild ancestors of domestic animals were determined, the question became of identifying molecular genetic signs of domestication. Traditionally, such research involves comparing DNA samples of wild and domestic animal populations of the same species and searching for genomic regions that demonstrate significant genetic differentiation between them. The genetic differentiation is generally based on differences in allele frequencies between populations, calculated using FST or similar statistical methods. For example, a comparison of the genomes of the Asian mouflon (Ovis orientalis), the bezoar goat (Capra hircus aegagrus), as well as domestic local breeds of sheep and goats within the geographic centers of domestication and cross-border commercial breeds, identified the regions of the genome that were subjected to the strongest selection pressure. By sequencing a library of DNA fragments 300-600 bp in size. sheep and goats, about 33 million Ovis and 23 million Capra SNPs were identified. Using haplotype differentiation as a signature (evidence) of selection, 46 and 44 regions of the domestic sheep and domestic goat genome, respectively, were found to be under selection pressure (Alberto, et al. 2018). Thus, understanding the processes of animal domestication contributes to more thoughtful breeding work to improve animal productivity, achieve desired genetic changes through targeted mutations and genomic selection. The study of the process of domestication allows us to look at the relationship between humanity and the animal world in a new way and to define new ethical standards.\nThe review will help you form your own opinion about the process of domestication,\ndefinition of concepts and further prospects for research in this direction.\nKey words: domestication, DNA, mitochondrial genome, haplotype, pigs, horses,\nsheep, goats, cattle, neolithic.","PeriodicalId":178711,"journal":{"name":"Pig breeding the interdepartmental subject scientific digest","volume":"219 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pig breeding the interdepartmental subject scientific digest","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.37143/0371-4365-2021-75-76-07","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In the article it is presented the results of studies of domestication processes of the main species of agricultural animals, which were carried out with the involvement of mitochondrial genome polymorphism. Mitochondrial genome polymorphism was used in the research of domestication processes for the reason that the inclusion of mitochondrial genes in domestic animal populations occurred only as a result of domestication of females. Most often, mitochondrial DNA sequences are used to determine possible wild ancestors, the number of maternal lines and their geographic origin. Domestication can be may be considered as the final phase of intensification of relations between subpopulations of animals or plants and human societies. It consists of several degrees of intensification, which in different ways and during different periods can end with the appearance of domestic animals, plants and microorganisms formed by people. While domestication of wild animals is a form of domestication that does not entail any visible morphological changes, at least from an archeological point of view (Vigne, 2011). The emergence of agriculture in Neolithic times included the domestication of ungulates animals and was a critical moment in human development. The goat (Capra hircus) was one of the first domesticated species of ungulates animals. The main centers of domestication are believed to be the eastern half of the Iranian plateau and eastern Anatolia (Naderi et al., 2008). Sheep (Ovis aries) were domesticated in the so-called Fertile Crescent region about 9,000–8,000 years ago. Mitochondrial DNA polymorphism studies from 323 modern and 221 fossil pig bones collected throughout western Eurasia showed that domestic pigs of Near Eastern origin introduced to Europe during the Neolithic (potentially via two separate routes) reached the Paris Basin at least as early as the 4th th millennium BC. The native European wild pig had also been domesticated by that time, possibly as a direct result of the introduction of domestic pigs from the Middle East (Larson, et al. 2007). After the species of wild ancestors of domestic animals were determined, the question became of identifying molecular genetic signs of domestication. Traditionally, such research involves comparing DNA samples of wild and domestic animal populations of the same species and searching for genomic regions that demonstrate significant genetic differentiation between them. The genetic differentiation is generally based on differences in allele frequencies between populations, calculated using FST or similar statistical methods. For example, a comparison of the genomes of the Asian mouflon (Ovis orientalis), the bezoar goat (Capra hircus aegagrus), as well as domestic local breeds of sheep and goats within the geographic centers of domestication and cross-border commercial breeds, identified the regions of the genome that were subjected to the strongest selection pressure. By sequencing a library of DNA fragments 300-600 bp in size. sheep and goats, about 33 million Ovis and 23 million Capra SNPs were identified. Using haplotype differentiation as a signature (evidence) of selection, 46 and 44 regions of the domestic sheep and domestic goat genome, respectively, were found to be under selection pressure (Alberto, et al. 2018). Thus, understanding the processes of animal domestication contributes to more thoughtful breeding work to improve animal productivity, achieve desired genetic changes through targeted mutations and genomic selection. The study of the process of domestication allows us to look at the relationship between humanity and the animal world in a new way and to define new ethical standards. The review will help you form your own opinion about the process of domestication, definition of concepts and further prospects for research in this direction. Key words: domestication, DNA, mitochondrial genome, haplotype, pigs, horses, sheep, goats, cattle, neolithic.
利用线粒体基因组多态性研究动物驯化过程(综述)
本文介绍了在线粒体基因组多态性参与下对主要农业动物物种驯化过程的研究结果。线粒体基因组多态性被用于驯化过程的研究,因为线粒体基因在家畜种群中的包含只发生在雌性驯化的结果中。最常见的是,线粒体DNA序列被用来确定可能的野生祖先,母系的数量和它们的地理起源。驯化可以被认为是动物或植物亚种群与人类社会之间关系加强的最后阶段。它由几个程度的强化组成,以不同的方式和在不同的时期,以家畜、植物和人类形成的微生物的出现而结束。而野生动物的驯化是一种驯化形式,不需要任何可见的形态变化,至少从考古学的角度来看(Vigne, 2011)。新石器时代农业的出现包括有蹄动物的驯化,是人类发展的关键时刻。山羊(Capra hircus)是最早被驯化的有蹄类动物之一。驯化的主要中心被认为是伊朗高原的东半部和安纳托利亚东部(Naderi et al., 2008)。大约9000 - 8000年前,绵羊(Ovis aries)在所谓的新月沃土地区被驯化。对欧亚大陆西部地区收集的323具现代猪骨和221具猪骨化石的线粒体DNA多态性研究表明,在新石器时代(可能通过两条不同的路线)传入欧洲的近东家猪至少早在公元前4千年就到达了巴黎盆地。当时,欧洲本土野猪也已被驯化,这可能是从中东引进家猪的直接结果(Larson, et al. 2007)。在确定了家畜的野生祖先的种类之后,问题就变成了识别驯化的分子遗传标志。传统上,这类研究包括比较同一物种的野生和家养动物种群的DNA样本,并寻找显示它们之间存在显著遗传差异的基因组区域。遗传分化通常基于群体之间等位基因频率的差异,使用FST或类似的统计方法计算。例如,对亚洲摩夫龙(Ovis orientalis)、牛黄山羊(Capra hircus aegagrus)以及驯化地理中心和跨境商业品种内的国内本地绵羊和山羊品种的基因组进行比较,确定了遭受最强选择压力的基因组区域。通过测序一个300- 600bp大小的DNA片段库。绵羊和山羊中,约有3300万个奥维斯和2300万个卡普拉snp被发现。将单倍型分化作为选择的标志(证据),分别发现家养绵羊和家养山羊基因组的46个和44个区域处于选择压力之下(Alberto等,2018)。因此,了解动物驯化过程有助于更周到的育种工作,以提高动物生产力,通过靶向突变和基因组选择实现所需的遗传变化。驯化过程的研究使我们能够以一种新的方式看待人类与动物世界的关系,并定义新的伦理标准。这篇综述将帮助你对归化的过程、概念的定义以及这一方向的进一步研究前景形成自己的看法。关键词:驯化,DNA,线粒体基因组,单倍型,猪,马,绵羊,山羊,牛,新石器时代
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信