SETTLEMENT OF A DISPUTE WITH THE PARTICIPATION OF A JUDGE

L. Ostafiichuk
{"title":"SETTLEMENT OF A DISPUTE WITH THE PARTICIPATION OF A JUDGE","authors":"L. Ostafiichuk","doi":"10.21303/2613-5647.2019.00928","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This research is devoted to the \"settlement of a dispute with the participation of a judge\" institute, which at the end of 2017 was introduced into the administrative, economic and civil processes of Ukraine. During the preparatory proceedings the legislator has provided for the plaintiff and the defendant the opportunity to apply the procedure of peaceful settlement of a dispute with a judge. Of course, for the short time of existence, settlement of a dispute with a judge does not have the proper application in judicial practice. This is due to caution of the subjects of its application, and so the uncertainty and sometimes incomprehensibility purpose of this procedure. There are many subjective and objective factors. But the key is the Ukrainian’s perception of court, mainly as a punitiver, than a state body that protects human right and inability to conduct constructive negotiations and agreement. Despite these obstacles, it should be done as evidenced although rare positive jurisprudence [1]. The main focus of the research of the institute of dispute settlement involving judges should be the unification of the provisions relating to procedures foundations (principles, the beginning and the end, the order and timing of, etc.). Thanks to the practical application, the order of the procedure will be improved. But there are issues that require theoretical development. Based on the available papers of scientists and practitioners, items in this article will attempt to reveal the concept of settlement of a dispute with a judge: opportunities and risks.","PeriodicalId":346863,"journal":{"name":"Technology transfer: innovative solutions in Social Sciences and Humanities","volume":"6 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-06-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Technology transfer: innovative solutions in Social Sciences and Humanities","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21303/2613-5647.2019.00928","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

This research is devoted to the "settlement of a dispute with the participation of a judge" institute, which at the end of 2017 was introduced into the administrative, economic and civil processes of Ukraine. During the preparatory proceedings the legislator has provided for the plaintiff and the defendant the opportunity to apply the procedure of peaceful settlement of a dispute with a judge. Of course, for the short time of existence, settlement of a dispute with a judge does not have the proper application in judicial practice. This is due to caution of the subjects of its application, and so the uncertainty and sometimes incomprehensibility purpose of this procedure. There are many subjective and objective factors. But the key is the Ukrainian’s perception of court, mainly as a punitiver, than a state body that protects human right and inability to conduct constructive negotiations and agreement. Despite these obstacles, it should be done as evidenced although rare positive jurisprudence [1]. The main focus of the research of the institute of dispute settlement involving judges should be the unification of the provisions relating to procedures foundations (principles, the beginning and the end, the order and timing of, etc.). Thanks to the practical application, the order of the procedure will be improved. But there are issues that require theoretical development. Based on the available papers of scientists and practitioners, items in this article will attempt to reveal the concept of settlement of a dispute with a judge: opportunities and risks.
在法官的参与下解决争端
这项研究致力于“在法官的参与下解决争端”研究所,该研究所于2017年底被引入乌克兰的行政、经济和民事程序。在准备程序期间,立法者为原告和被告提供了向法官申请和平解决争端程序的机会。当然,由于存在的时间较短,与法官解决纠纷在司法实践中并没有得到应有的应用。这是由于其应用对象的谨慎,因此该程序的目的是不确定的,有时是不可理解的。主观和客观因素很多。但关键在于乌克兰人认为法院主要是一个惩罚者,而不是一个保护人权的国家机构,无法进行建设性的谈判和达成协议。尽管存在这些障碍,但它应该这样做,尽管很少有正面的法理学证据。法官争端解决机制研究的重点应是程序基础(原则、开始和结束、顺序和时间等)规定的统一。通过实际应用,程序的顺序将得到改进。但也有一些问题需要理论发展。基于现有的科学家和从业者的论文,本文的项目将试图揭示与法官解决争端的概念:机会和风险。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信