Influence of Strategy Execution on Academic Performance of National Schools in Kenya

Clare Gakenia, P. Katuse, Dr.Peter Kiriri
{"title":"Influence of Strategy Execution on Academic Performance of National Schools in Kenya","authors":"Clare Gakenia, P. Katuse, Dr.Peter Kiriri","doi":"10.9790/487X-1907012540","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The role of leadership in a school is of importance to the academic performance of the school which is its core mandate. The school principal or head teacher is the head of the school and performs critical functions that dictate on the academic performance of the school. The school principals are charged with five major roles including administering the approved school curriculum, school finance and business, staff and students in the school, school plant and equipment and school community relations. The principal as the chief executive is the overall in charge of the school and is responsible for the quality of the school. S/he supervises the whole school programs and bears the ultimate responsibility for the overall school performance, proficiency and effectiveness including the competency of all school programs. The head is the secretary to the BOG, and in charge of the day-to-day activities in the school. He should understand the departmental programs and work closely with all the teachers through consultation on issues of mutual interest to the school like games and sports, other co-curricular activities and examinations. The school head should be well informed and experienced on the school system and should have an orientation to the whole school program. The school principals play the role of administrators in addition to teaching duties that they may have. In this capacity, the school principals coordinate the efforts of diverse stakeholders towards the achievement of the school educational goals. These stakeholders include the teachers, parents, students, education officials and the community surrounding the school. These stakeholders influence the academic goals of the institution in diverse ways. Amongst the stakeholder management functions or coordinating efforts that the principals undertake include professional advice to the school board, leaders of reforms, managers of resources and communicators to the public. School leadership is therefore concerned with pupils, teachers and the rules, regulations and policies that govern the school system. This study sought to examine the role of strategy execution on the performance of national schools. The cumulative effect of strategy execution metrics on the academic performance was examined using multiple linear regression analysis. The positive multiple correlation coefficient (R) indicated the cumulative effect of strategy execution is positively correlated to academic performance of national schools. There is a strong and positive correlation of 0.479 between the strategy execution and academic performance of national schools. On the other hand, the coefficient of determination (R Square) of 0.229 indicates that 22.9% of the variance in academic performance can be attributed to strategy execution in national schools.To examine if the multiple linear regression was a good fit for data, then the ANOVA of strategy Execution was examined. Since F (11, 75) = 2.030, p<0.037 then the model was considered a good predictor of academic performance as a p value of 0.037, implied only a 3.7% likelihood of a multiple linear regression model giving the wrong responses. Therefore, the multiple linear regression of strategy execution was undertaken.","PeriodicalId":165213,"journal":{"name":"IOSR Journal of Business and Management","volume":"105 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"IOSR Journal of Business and Management","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.9790/487X-1907012540","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

The role of leadership in a school is of importance to the academic performance of the school which is its core mandate. The school principal or head teacher is the head of the school and performs critical functions that dictate on the academic performance of the school. The school principals are charged with five major roles including administering the approved school curriculum, school finance and business, staff and students in the school, school plant and equipment and school community relations. The principal as the chief executive is the overall in charge of the school and is responsible for the quality of the school. S/he supervises the whole school programs and bears the ultimate responsibility for the overall school performance, proficiency and effectiveness including the competency of all school programs. The head is the secretary to the BOG, and in charge of the day-to-day activities in the school. He should understand the departmental programs and work closely with all the teachers through consultation on issues of mutual interest to the school like games and sports, other co-curricular activities and examinations. The school head should be well informed and experienced on the school system and should have an orientation to the whole school program. The school principals play the role of administrators in addition to teaching duties that they may have. In this capacity, the school principals coordinate the efforts of diverse stakeholders towards the achievement of the school educational goals. These stakeholders include the teachers, parents, students, education officials and the community surrounding the school. These stakeholders influence the academic goals of the institution in diverse ways. Amongst the stakeholder management functions or coordinating efforts that the principals undertake include professional advice to the school board, leaders of reforms, managers of resources and communicators to the public. School leadership is therefore concerned with pupils, teachers and the rules, regulations and policies that govern the school system. This study sought to examine the role of strategy execution on the performance of national schools. The cumulative effect of strategy execution metrics on the academic performance was examined using multiple linear regression analysis. The positive multiple correlation coefficient (R) indicated the cumulative effect of strategy execution is positively correlated to academic performance of national schools. There is a strong and positive correlation of 0.479 between the strategy execution and academic performance of national schools. On the other hand, the coefficient of determination (R Square) of 0.229 indicates that 22.9% of the variance in academic performance can be attributed to strategy execution in national schools.To examine if the multiple linear regression was a good fit for data, then the ANOVA of strategy Execution was examined. Since F (11, 75) = 2.030, p<0.037 then the model was considered a good predictor of academic performance as a p value of 0.037, implied only a 3.7% likelihood of a multiple linear regression model giving the wrong responses. Therefore, the multiple linear regression of strategy execution was undertaken.
战略执行对肯尼亚国家学校学业成绩的影响
学校的领导角色对学校的学业成绩至关重要,这是学校的核心任务。学校校长或校长是学校的负责人,对学校的学习成绩起着重要的作用。学校校长主要负责五项工作,包括管理学校的核准课程、管理学校的财务及业务、管理学校的教职员和学生、管理学校的设备和设备,以及管理学校的社区关系。校长作为学校的首席执行官,是学校的全面负责人,对学校的质量负责。监督整个学校项目,并对学校的整体表现、熟练程度和有效性(包括所有学校项目的能力)承担最终责任。校长是BOG的秘书,负责学校的日常活动。他应该了解部门的计划,并与所有老师密切合作,就学校共同感兴趣的问题进行协商,如游戏和体育,其他课外活动和考试。校长应该对学校系统有充分的了解和经验,应该对整个学校项目有一个方向。学校校长除了承担教学职责外,还扮演着管理者的角色。校长以这种身份协调不同利益相关者的努力,以实现学校的教育目标。这些利益相关者包括教师、家长、学生、教育官员和学校周围的社区。这些利益相关者以不同的方式影响机构的学术目标。校长承担的利益相关者管理职能或协调工作包括向学校董事会、改革领导者、资源管理者和公众传播者提供专业建议。因此,学校领导关心的是学生、教师以及管理学校系统的规章制度和政策。本研究旨在探讨战略执行对国家学校绩效的作用。运用多元线性回归分析检验策略执行指标对学业成绩的累积效应。正多元相关系数(R)表明,战略执行的累积效应与国家学校的学业成绩呈正相关。国家学校的战略执行与学业成绩之间存在较强的正相关(0.479)。另一方面,决定系数(R方)为0.229表明,22.9%的学业成绩差异可归因于国家学校的战略执行。为了检验多元线性回归是否能很好地拟合数据,然后对策略执行进行了方差分析。由于F (11,75) = 2.030, p<0.037,因此该模型被认为是学业成绩的良好预测因子,p值为0.037,意味着多元线性回归模型给出错误答案的可能性仅为3.7%。因此,对战略执行情况进行多元线性回归。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信