Accuracy of Radiological Axillary Staging for Breast Cancer Patients with Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy

H. Ahn, Sang Yull Kang, S. Jung, H. Youn
{"title":"Accuracy of Radiological Axillary Staging for Breast Cancer Patients with Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy","authors":"H. Ahn, Sang Yull Kang, S. Jung, H. Youn","doi":"10.14449/jbd.2020.8.2.85","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Purpose: Neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) in breast cancer patients has the advantage of decreasing related morbidities by reducing the extent of axillary surgery. However, it remains a controversy with regards to the appropriate extent of axillary lymph node dissection after NACT. Therefore, this study aims to investigate the accuracy of breast ultrasonography (US) and breast magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) to assess the axillary nodal status after NACT. Methods: We reviewed preand post-NACT axillary imaging and clinicopathological data of patients who received NACT for primary breast cancer and underwent surgery. After NACT, accuracy of imaging modalities were evaluated through the comparison of pathologic lymph node (LN) status and imaging LN status. Results: Fifty seven patients completed NACT and underwent surgery. Breast US was found to have a sensitivity of 61.1%, specificity of 57.7%, negative predictive value (NPV) of 68.2%, and positive predictive value (PPV) of 50.0%. For breast MRI, sensitivity was 58.3%, specificity 75.8%, NPV 71.4%, and PPV 63.6%. For US combined with MRI, sensitivity was 66.7%, specificity 54.5%, NPV 69.2%, and PPV 51.6%. The accuracy of imaging modalities was 59.1% for US, 68.4% for MRI, and 59.6% for US combined with MRI. Conclusion: In breast cancer patients who received NACT, MRI showed a higher specificity, NPV, and PPV than US, although it had a lower sensitivity. However, due to the low accuracy, breast MRI alone is not sufficient to determine the extent of axillary surgery. Therefore, determining the extent of axillary surgery based on the results of intraoperative sentinel lymph node biopsy may be the right method for accurate staging.","PeriodicalId":245382,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Breast Disease","volume":"50 4","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-12-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Breast Disease","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14449/jbd.2020.8.2.85","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: Neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) in breast cancer patients has the advantage of decreasing related morbidities by reducing the extent of axillary surgery. However, it remains a controversy with regards to the appropriate extent of axillary lymph node dissection after NACT. Therefore, this study aims to investigate the accuracy of breast ultrasonography (US) and breast magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) to assess the axillary nodal status after NACT. Methods: We reviewed preand post-NACT axillary imaging and clinicopathological data of patients who received NACT for primary breast cancer and underwent surgery. After NACT, accuracy of imaging modalities were evaluated through the comparison of pathologic lymph node (LN) status and imaging LN status. Results: Fifty seven patients completed NACT and underwent surgery. Breast US was found to have a sensitivity of 61.1%, specificity of 57.7%, negative predictive value (NPV) of 68.2%, and positive predictive value (PPV) of 50.0%. For breast MRI, sensitivity was 58.3%, specificity 75.8%, NPV 71.4%, and PPV 63.6%. For US combined with MRI, sensitivity was 66.7%, specificity 54.5%, NPV 69.2%, and PPV 51.6%. The accuracy of imaging modalities was 59.1% for US, 68.4% for MRI, and 59.6% for US combined with MRI. Conclusion: In breast cancer patients who received NACT, MRI showed a higher specificity, NPV, and PPV than US, although it had a lower sensitivity. However, due to the low accuracy, breast MRI alone is not sufficient to determine the extent of axillary surgery. Therefore, determining the extent of axillary surgery based on the results of intraoperative sentinel lymph node biopsy may be the right method for accurate staging.
乳腺癌新辅助化疗患者腋窝分期的准确性
目的:乳腺癌患者新辅助化疗(NACT)的优点是通过减少腋窝手术的范围来降低相关的发病率。然而,对于NACT术后腋窝淋巴结清扫的适当程度仍存在争议。因此,本研究旨在探讨乳腺超声(US)和乳腺磁共振成像(MRI)评估NACT术后腋窝淋巴结状态的准确性。方法:我们回顾了原发性乳腺癌患者接受NACT手术前后的腋窝影像学和临床病理资料。在NACT后,通过比较病理淋巴结(LN)状态和影像学淋巴结状态来评估成像方式的准确性。结果:57例患者完成NACT并行手术治疗。乳腺US的敏感性为61.1%,特异性为57.7%,阴性预测值(NPV)为68.2%,阳性预测值(PPV)为50.0%。乳腺MRI的敏感性为58.3%,特异性为75.8%,NPV为71.4%,PPV为63.6%。US联合MRI敏感性为66.7%,特异性为54.5%,NPV为69.2%,PPV为51.6%。超声成像的准确率为59.1%,MRI为68.4%,超声联合MRI为59.6%。结论:在接受NACT的乳腺癌患者中,MRI的特异性、NPV和PPV均高于US,但敏感性较低。然而,由于准确性较低,仅乳房MRI不足以确定腋窝手术的程度。因此,根据术中前哨淋巴结活检结果确定腋窝手术范围可能是准确分期的正确方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信