METHODOLOGICAL ASPECTS OF INSTITUTIONAL PROVISION OF SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT OF TERRITORIES IN THE CONTEXT OF THE DECENTRALIZATION PROCESS

G. Sharyi, Hanna Obykhod, Viktor Dubіschev
{"title":"METHODOLOGICAL ASPECTS OF INSTITUTIONAL PROVISION OF SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT OF TERRITORIES IN THE CONTEXT OF THE DECENTRALIZATION PROCESS","authors":"G. Sharyi, Hanna Obykhod, Viktor Dubіschev","doi":"10.37100/2616-7689/2019/6(25)/10","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The institutional system in Ukraine, which is characterized by the rule of interests of the authorities over the interests of the society, neglect of the rights of business agents, as well as the use of power for the personal benefit of officials, is investigated. At the same time, the state is the main institution for sustainable development, which should determine the priority economic, social and environmental activities. Responsible institutions are obliged to develop the necessary mechanisms to ensure sustainability, strengthen positions in the areas of human capital development and improve the quality of life. New governance tools and mechanisms will facilitate the involvement of the private sector in the implementation of sustainable development principles through renewed relationships between business entities based on equal partnership and the use of mechanisms to ensure the harmonization of business interests in achieving social, economic and environmental sustainability.\nIrrationality, disproportionality, complexity of administrative-territorial entities of the united territorial communities were taken into account in this article. Ways of executive power institutionalization, development of territories in accordance with requirements of institutionalism, and its role and place in administrative-territorial reform were determined. It is argued that the only institutional set of society is an institutional matrix. Institutional matrix of society is presented as a stable triad of basic elements – macro-institutions that integrate and stabilize society: economy, politics, and culture. And the modernization of the system of public administration institutions, decentralization of powers to the level of united territorial communities should form a stable system of sustainable development of the territory and a safe socio-ecological and economic environment.","PeriodicalId":404902,"journal":{"name":"Environmental Economics and Sustainable Development","volume":"21 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Environmental Economics and Sustainable Development","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.37100/2616-7689/2019/6(25)/10","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The institutional system in Ukraine, which is characterized by the rule of interests of the authorities over the interests of the society, neglect of the rights of business agents, as well as the use of power for the personal benefit of officials, is investigated. At the same time, the state is the main institution for sustainable development, which should determine the priority economic, social and environmental activities. Responsible institutions are obliged to develop the necessary mechanisms to ensure sustainability, strengthen positions in the areas of human capital development and improve the quality of life. New governance tools and mechanisms will facilitate the involvement of the private sector in the implementation of sustainable development principles through renewed relationships between business entities based on equal partnership and the use of mechanisms to ensure the harmonization of business interests in achieving social, economic and environmental sustainability. Irrationality, disproportionality, complexity of administrative-territorial entities of the united territorial communities were taken into account in this article. Ways of executive power institutionalization, development of territories in accordance with requirements of institutionalism, and its role and place in administrative-territorial reform were determined. It is argued that the only institutional set of society is an institutional matrix. Institutional matrix of society is presented as a stable triad of basic elements – macro-institutions that integrate and stabilize society: economy, politics, and culture. And the modernization of the system of public administration institutions, decentralization of powers to the level of united territorial communities should form a stable system of sustainable development of the territory and a safe socio-ecological and economic environment.
在权力下放进程范围内提供领土可持续发展的体制方面的方法问题
调查了乌克兰的制度体系,其特点是当局的利益统治社会的利益,忽视商业代理人的权利,以及利用权力为官员的个人利益服务。同时,国家是可持续发展的主要机构,它应该确定经济、社会和环境活动的优先事项。负责任的机构有义务发展必要的机制,以确保可持续性,加强人力资本发展领域的地位,并改善生活质量。新的管理工具和机制将促进私营部门参与执行可持续发展原则,办法是在平等伙伴关系的基础上重新建立商业实体之间的关系,并利用各种机制确保在实现社会、经济和环境的可持续性方面协调商业利益。本条考虑到联合领土共同体行政领土实体的不合理性、不成比例性和复杂性。确定了行政权力制度化的途径,按照制度主义的要求发展领土,以及行政领土在行政领土改革中的作用和地位。有人认为,社会的唯一制度集合是制度矩阵。社会的制度矩阵被呈现为一个稳定的基本要素三元组——整合和稳定社会的宏观制度:经济、政治和文化。而公共行政体制的现代化,权力下放到统一的领土共同体层面,应该形成一个稳定的领土可持续发展体系和安全的社会生态和经济环境。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信