Agamben’s cinema: Psychology versus an ethical form of life

Janet P. Harbord
{"title":"Agamben’s cinema: Psychology versus an ethical form of life","authors":"Janet P. Harbord","doi":"10.5117/NECSUS2015.2.HARB","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Agamben’s essay on gesture is perhaps his most influential piece of work for film studies, in which he argues that cinema at its inception captures the moment at which humans have lost control of their gestures, manifest in a crisis of communicability. Comparing the traces of the gesticulating bodies of Gilles de la Tourette’s patients with those in the proto-cinematic series of photographs taken by EadwardMuybridge, Agamben suggests that these are the twin processes of a biopolitical production of life; respectively, the body as the site of investigation and the exemplary body put to work. Yet the ethicopolitical implications of Agamben’s essay on gesture and the biopolitical production of life are relatively under-developed. This article pursues not only cinema’s relation to biopolitical capture but also theway inwhich cinema came to compensate for such a reductive version of corporeality by constructing the concept of an individual located as complex interiority. When gestural communication declines at the close of the 19 century meaning is relocated to the internal space within the human body; commensurate with this production of human interiority as a site of truth, cinema becomes a machine whose task is to decipher the turmoil of the inside, a process reproduced as narrative explication.","PeriodicalId":174743,"journal":{"name":"Necsus. European Journal of Media Studies","volume":"108 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-09-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Necsus. European Journal of Media Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5117/NECSUS2015.2.HARB","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

Agamben’s essay on gesture is perhaps his most influential piece of work for film studies, in which he argues that cinema at its inception captures the moment at which humans have lost control of their gestures, manifest in a crisis of communicability. Comparing the traces of the gesticulating bodies of Gilles de la Tourette’s patients with those in the proto-cinematic series of photographs taken by EadwardMuybridge, Agamben suggests that these are the twin processes of a biopolitical production of life; respectively, the body as the site of investigation and the exemplary body put to work. Yet the ethicopolitical implications of Agamben’s essay on gesture and the biopolitical production of life are relatively under-developed. This article pursues not only cinema’s relation to biopolitical capture but also theway inwhich cinema came to compensate for such a reductive version of corporeality by constructing the concept of an individual located as complex interiority. When gestural communication declines at the close of the 19 century meaning is relocated to the internal space within the human body; commensurate with this production of human interiority as a site of truth, cinema becomes a machine whose task is to decipher the turmoil of the inside, a process reproduced as narrative explication.
阿甘本的电影:心理学与生命的伦理形式
阿甘本关于手势的文章可能是他对电影研究最有影响力的一篇文章,他认为电影在其诞生之初就抓住了人类失去对手势控制的那一刻,表现在可沟通性的危机中。阿甘本将吉尔斯·德·拉·图雷特氏症患者的肢体动作痕迹与爱德华·迈布里奇拍摄的电影原型系列照片进行了比较,认为这是生命的生物政治生产的双重过程;分别作为现场调查主体和示范主体投入工作。然而,阿甘本关于姿态和生命的生物政治生产的文章的伦理政治含义相对来说还不够发达。本文不仅探讨了电影与生命政治捕获的关系,还探讨了电影如何通过构建复杂内在性的个人概念来补偿这种肉体化的简化版本。当手势交流在19世纪末衰落时,意义被重新定位到人体内部空间;与这种将人类内在作为真实场所的生产相称,电影成为一台机器,其任务是破译内心的动荡,这是一种叙事解释的复制过程。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信