Delegation and Decentralization: Reform Ideas for Bihar’s Economic Transformation

Stuti Khemani
{"title":"Delegation and Decentralization: Reform Ideas for Bihar’s Economic Transformation","authors":"Stuti Khemani","doi":"10.1177/2633190X21991937","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article proposes reform ideas for Bihar using advances in economics research on the role of institutions in economic development. Institutions—the formal and informal rules of the ‘game’ of how people interact in society—are fundamental determinants of economic activity and entrepreneurship. Historical institutions of caste-based feudalism in Bihar have been regarded as depressing entrepreneurship and encouraging lawlessness and corruption. New survey data–based evidence shows the potential of two reforms to bring about Bihar’s institutional and economic transformation: greater delegation of public policy implementation in bureaucracies and greater decentralization of public policy selection to local governments. Greater delegation means giving autonomy and discretion to agents in bureaucracies, and promoting professional norms for service delivery rather than hierarchical monitoring and disciplining to achieve performance. Greater decentralization means that more policy choices—such as on the composition of public expenditures, tariffs and fees for public infrastructure—are made by local leaders who gain the power to make these choices by winning more local elections. Communication within bureaucracies and through local media about the performance of public policies is part of these institutional reforms. Taken together, these can reduce the influence of patronage politics and enable the selection of leaders who pursue policies in the broad public interest. In turn, these institutional changes can spur greater economic activity and entrepreneurship, including all social groups in growth and prosperity.","PeriodicalId":193085,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Asian Development Research","volume":"12 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Asian Development Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/2633190X21991937","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

This article proposes reform ideas for Bihar using advances in economics research on the role of institutions in economic development. Institutions—the formal and informal rules of the ‘game’ of how people interact in society—are fundamental determinants of economic activity and entrepreneurship. Historical institutions of caste-based feudalism in Bihar have been regarded as depressing entrepreneurship and encouraging lawlessness and corruption. New survey data–based evidence shows the potential of two reforms to bring about Bihar’s institutional and economic transformation: greater delegation of public policy implementation in bureaucracies and greater decentralization of public policy selection to local governments. Greater delegation means giving autonomy and discretion to agents in bureaucracies, and promoting professional norms for service delivery rather than hierarchical monitoring and disciplining to achieve performance. Greater decentralization means that more policy choices—such as on the composition of public expenditures, tariffs and fees for public infrastructure—are made by local leaders who gain the power to make these choices by winning more local elections. Communication within bureaucracies and through local media about the performance of public policies is part of these institutional reforms. Taken together, these can reduce the influence of patronage politics and enable the selection of leaders who pursue policies in the broad public interest. In turn, these institutional changes can spur greater economic activity and entrepreneurship, including all social groups in growth and prosperity.
下放与分权:比哈尔邦经济转型的改革思路
本文利用有关制度在经济发展中的作用的经济学研究成果,提出了比哈尔邦的改革思路。制度——人们如何在社会中互动的正式和非正式的“游戏”规则——是经济活动和企业家精神的基本决定因素。比哈尔邦历史上以种姓为基础的封建制度被认为压抑了企业家精神,鼓励了不法行为和腐败。新的基于调查数据的证据表明,两项改革有可能带来比哈尔邦的制度和经济转型:在官僚机构中更多地授权公共政策执行,以及在更大程度上将公共政策选择的权力下放给地方政府。更大的授权意味着给予官僚机构中的代理人自主权和自由裁量权,促进提供服务的专业规范,而不是为了实现绩效而进行分层监督和纪律处分。更大的权力下放意味着更多的政策选择——比如公共支出的构成、公共基础设施的关税和费用——由地方领导人做出,他们通过赢得更多的地方选举获得做出这些选择的权力。在官僚机构内部和通过地方媒体就公共政策的执行情况进行沟通是这些体制改革的一部分。这些因素加在一起,可以减少任免政治的影响,并能够选出追求符合广泛公众利益的政策的领导人。反过来,这些制度变革可以刺激更多的经济活动和创业精神,包括所有社会群体的增长和繁荣。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信