SOME ALLOCATION ISSUES OF THE PRINCIPLES OF UNCODIFIED BRANCHES OF LAW

V. Iliukhina
{"title":"SOME ALLOCATION ISSUES OF THE PRINCIPLES OF UNCODIFIED BRANCHES OF LAW","authors":"V. Iliukhina","doi":"10.5922/sikbfu-2022-4-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The principles of law are considered within the positivist legal understanding as the normatively fixed fundamental concept of each industry. The general legal principles enshrined in the Constitution of the Russian Federation are thought to directly apply both in codified and uncodified industries, regardless of whether they are duplicated in industry legislation or not. The article highlights a number of problems related to the allocation of the principles of uncodified branches of law. Firstly, it is rather unclear whether a particular legal entity is a specific branch of law or not. This is particularly difficult in the case of uncodified branches of law. Secondly, some of the criteria for recognising legal principles that are characteristic of codified branches of law do not work when identifying the principles of uncodified branches of law. Thirdly, sectoral principles in codified branches of law are enshrined only in the Constitution of the Russian Federation and/or sectoral codes. In uncodified branches the source of enshrining the principles of law is the Constitution of the Russian Federation and branch uncodified legislation that is a set of normative legal acts. In this situation the problem arises whether any normative legal act can enshrine the principles of the corresponding branch or only in some basic act which replaces the codified act? Finally, if the author accepts the possibility of principles of law being enshrined in different normative acts, the problem arises of the hierarchy and correlation of principles from different normative acts. The article outlines the ways to solve these challenges.","PeriodicalId":104739,"journal":{"name":"Vestnik of Immanuel Kant Baltic Federal University Series Humanities and social science","volume":"48 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Vestnik of Immanuel Kant Baltic Federal University Series Humanities and social science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5922/sikbfu-2022-4-1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The principles of law are considered within the positivist legal understanding as the normatively fixed fundamental concept of each industry. The general legal principles enshrined in the Constitution of the Russian Federation are thought to directly apply both in codified and uncodified industries, regardless of whether they are duplicated in industry legislation or not. The article highlights a number of problems related to the allocation of the principles of uncodified branches of law. Firstly, it is rather unclear whether a particular legal entity is a specific branch of law or not. This is particularly difficult in the case of uncodified branches of law. Secondly, some of the criteria for recognising legal principles that are characteristic of codified branches of law do not work when identifying the principles of uncodified branches of law. Thirdly, sectoral principles in codified branches of law are enshrined only in the Constitution of the Russian Federation and/or sectoral codes. In uncodified branches the source of enshrining the principles of law is the Constitution of the Russian Federation and branch uncodified legislation that is a set of normative legal acts. In this situation the problem arises whether any normative legal act can enshrine the principles of the corresponding branch or only in some basic act which replaces the codified act? Finally, if the author accepts the possibility of principles of law being enshrined in different normative acts, the problem arises of the hierarchy and correlation of principles from different normative acts. The article outlines the ways to solve these challenges.
未成文法部门原则的若干分配问题
在实证主义的法律理解中,法律原则被认为是每个行业规范固定的基本概念。人们认为,载入俄罗斯联邦宪法的一般法律原则直接适用于已编纂和未编纂的工业,而不管这些原则是否在工业立法中重复。这篇文章强调了与未编纂的法律部门的原则分配有关的一些问题。首先,一个特定的法律实体是否属于一个特定的法律分支是相当不清楚的。这在未编纂的法律部门的情况下尤其困难。其次,作为法典化法律部门特征的一些认定法理的标准在认定非法典化法律部门的原则时并不适用。第三,成文法律部门的部门原则只载于俄罗斯联邦宪法和(或)部门法典。在非法典化部门,规定法律原则的来源是《俄罗斯联邦宪法》,而非法典化部门的立法是一套规范性法律行为。在这种情况下,问题出现了,是否任何规范性法律行为可以体现相应部门的原则,或者只能在一些基本行为中取代编纂行为?最后,如果作者接受法律原则被载入不同规范行为的可能性,那么不同规范行为中原则的等级和关联问题就出现了。本文概述了解决这些挑战的方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信