The Members Analysis in Namin・Noron Line Seowons in Sangju Region in the 17th and 18th Centuries -Focusing on Donam・Heungam Seowons-

So-Hee Park
{"title":"The Members Analysis in Namin・Noron Line Seowons in Sangju Region in the 17th and 18th Centuries -Focusing on Donam・Heungam Seowons-","authors":"So-Hee Park","doi":"10.15186/ikc.2022.08.31.03","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In Sangju, there are Donam and Heungam Seowons, which represented Namin and Noron lines in Yeongnam in the late Joseon era. \nDonam Seowon was established by all the literati classes in Sangju, mainly the followers of Ryu, Seong-ryong and Jeong Gyeong-se in the 17th Century. There were conflicts with the Sarim in Andong and Yean, which had been arising from the process of enshrinement of Ryu, Seong-ryong and Jeong Gyeong-se rather than those derived from the factions, while continuing the relationship with Yeoheon school. These could be confirmed by Shimwonrok, the records of the visitors of the seowon. \nSince then, in 1660, Donam Seowo requested donation to 15 eubs in order to rebuild Myeonryundang which had been demolished by fire. \nWhen reviewing the regions, Andong and Yean communities were omitted, while the Udo regions were relatively dominated. \nHeungam Seowon was built under protection by the ruling Noron in Sangju in the 18th C entury. T he s ewon was run by s uch the houses of Seong of Changnyeong, Chae of Incheon, and Shin of Pyeongsan, the Noron groups in Sangju and they built Seosan Seowon and Chunguidan, later, uniting their groups. T hey made the c laim when they found that Sangju’s local governor Cho, Jeong-man’s name was deleted in Shimwonrok in Donam Seowon, dominated this seowon, and elected the head from their own faction, having conflicts with Namin. It implies that there were so intense conflicts around Donam Seowon. However, since 1743, Donam Seowon’s head was elected among Namin Line, and then, Ryu, Shim-choon(a great-grand son of Ryu, Jin) who was a famous scholar and a follower of Jeong, Jong-ro at that time, Lee, Kyung-yu(a great-grandson of Lee, Man-bu) and Kang, Se-ryun were inaugurated as the head of the Seowon, enhancing the institution’s reputation.","PeriodicalId":255388,"journal":{"name":"Institute of Korean Cultural Studies Yeungnam University","volume":"50 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-08-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Institute of Korean Cultural Studies Yeungnam University","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15186/ikc.2022.08.31.03","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In Sangju, there are Donam and Heungam Seowons, which represented Namin and Noron lines in Yeongnam in the late Joseon era. Donam Seowon was established by all the literati classes in Sangju, mainly the followers of Ryu, Seong-ryong and Jeong Gyeong-se in the 17th Century. There were conflicts with the Sarim in Andong and Yean, which had been arising from the process of enshrinement of Ryu, Seong-ryong and Jeong Gyeong-se rather than those derived from the factions, while continuing the relationship with Yeoheon school. These could be confirmed by Shimwonrok, the records of the visitors of the seowon. Since then, in 1660, Donam Seowo requested donation to 15 eubs in order to rebuild Myeonryundang which had been demolished by fire. When reviewing the regions, Andong and Yean communities were omitted, while the Udo regions were relatively dominated. Heungam Seowon was built under protection by the ruling Noron in Sangju in the 18th C entury. T he s ewon was run by s uch the houses of Seong of Changnyeong, Chae of Incheon, and Shin of Pyeongsan, the Noron groups in Sangju and they built Seosan Seowon and Chunguidan, later, uniting their groups. T hey made the c laim when they found that Sangju’s local governor Cho, Jeong-man’s name was deleted in Shimwonrok in Donam Seowon, dominated this seowon, and elected the head from their own faction, having conflicts with Namin. It implies that there were so intense conflicts around Donam Seowon. However, since 1743, Donam Seowon’s head was elected among Namin Line, and then, Ryu, Shim-choon(a great-grand son of Ryu, Jin) who was a famous scholar and a follower of Jeong, Jong-ro at that time, Lee, Kyung-yu(a great-grandson of Lee, Man-bu) and Kang, Se-ryun were inaugurated as the head of the Seowon, enhancing the institution’s reputation.
17-18世纪尚州地区那民、那龙系书院的成员分析--以东安、兴安书院为中心
尚州有东岩书院和兴岩书院,它们代表了朝鲜时代后期岭南的南民系和北伦系。17世纪,尚州的所有文人阶层,主要是柳宗龙、成龙和郑敬世的追随者建立了东岩书院。与安东和礼安的萨林之间存在着冲突,这些冲突是在奉祀柳宗元、成龙和郑敬世的过程中产生的,而不是派别之间的冲突,同时与汝轩派(Yeoheon)的关系仍在继续。这些都可以从书院来访者的记录《下元录》中得到证实。此后,1660 年,东岩书院请求捐赠 15 个邑,以重建被大火烧毁的明伦堂。在考察地区时,安东和延安地区被遗漏,而郁岛地区则相对占优势。兴岩书院是 18 世纪在尚州统治者诺伦的保护下修建的。香岩书院由尚州的罗伦家族昌宁的成氏、仁川的蔡氏和平山的申氏等家族管理,他们后来建造了瑞山书院和春桂堂,将他们的家族联合起来。他们发现尚州地方长官赵贞文的名字在东岩书院的下元录中被删除,于是他们就在这个书院中占据了主导地位,并从自己的派系中选出了首领,与纳敏发生了冲突。这意味着围绕堂南书院发生了如此激烈的冲突。但是,从 1743 年开始,东岩书院的院主在南民系中选举产生,随后,当时郑宗路的追随者、著名学者柳下淳(柳镇的曾孙)、李景裕(李万弼的曾孙)和姜世伦就任书院院主,提高了书院的声誉。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信